Win / KotakuInAction2
KotakuInAction2
Communities Topics Log In Sign Up
Sign In
Hot
All Posts
Settings
All
Profile
Saved
Upvoted
Hidden
Messages

Your Communities

General
AskWin
Funny
Technology
Animals
Sports
Gaming
DIY
Health
Positive
Privacy
News
Changelogs

More Communities

frenworld
OhTwitter
MillionDollarExtreme
NoNewNormal
Ladies
Conspiracies
GreatAwakening
IP2Always
GameDev
ParallelSociety
Privacy Policy
Terms of Service
Content Policy
DEFAULT COMMUNITIES • All General AskWin Funny Technology Animals Sports Gaming DIY Health Positive Privacy
KotakuInAction2 The Official Gamergate Forum
hot new rising top

Sign In or Create an Account

59
Dr. Who episode 3 lost 360k viewers from episode 2 and is down 560k from episode 1 (twitter.com)
posted 2 years ago by Ahaus667 2 years ago by Ahaus667 +59 / -0
31 comments share
31 comments share save hide report block hide replies
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (31)
sorted by:
▲ 15 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 15 points 2 years ago +15 / -0

I'd link this video from Doomcock in relation to this.

If his insider is right, Doctor who could drop below a million viewers by the end of the season, it's that bad. I also know it's that bad as Doomcock also reviewed the two episodes and he deserves a vaction from that alone!

permalink save report block reply
▲ 31 ▼
– dagthegnome 31 points 2 years ago +31 / -0

Never believe anything you hear from Doomcock's "sources" and "rumours."

I'm still waiting for Gina Carano to appear in the Mandalorian Season 3 episode directed by George Lucas. Also waiting for Kathleen Kennedy to definitely, absolutely get fired this time for sure.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 12 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 12 points 2 years ago +12 / -0

To be fair, it's hard to see people acting THIS retarded as Disney have been acting. There's a limit to what the normal mind can perceive.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 14 ▼
– Adamrises 14 points 2 years ago +14 / -0

Its pretty easy to understand once you shake yourself of the idea that "money" and "direct ratings" are the only thing companies care about.

You don't even need to get into ESG and "Da Joos Humiliation Ritual of Our Culture" when things like optics and deceiving board members can carry "bad" decisions long beyond reasonability.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 2 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

I stand by my 'they're too retarded' take.

At least when I betray humanity for our future machine overlords, I'm securing my place in their human zoo. These guys are literally burning their company and assets to the ground for hollow platitudes.

permalink parent save report block reply
... continue reading thread?
▲ 1 ▼
– cosmicspiritwarrior 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0

His sources and rumours are correct enough, it's the predictions he makes about the Disney board having a rational reaction and following their fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders instead of digging in deeper into political agendas where he is off the mark.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 7 ▼
– simian 7 points 2 years ago +7 / -0

That's only on regular television, however. There were literally billions who watched it on iPlayer.

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 8 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 8 points 2 years ago +8 / -0

literally billions

Please say this is sarcasm or a typo, if even a billion wouldn't watch 'hot women bottle feeding newly born puppies' I doubt a billion would ever watch 'black fag acts pathetic through time and space'

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 9 ▼
– simian 9 points 2 years ago +9 / -0

It’s sarcasm. Although “more people are watching on iPlayer” IS the go-to defense. I know Disney+ doesn’t release watch numbers. Does BBC do this with iPlayer?

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 5 ▼
– SoctaticMethod1 5 points 2 years ago +5 / -0

I think they have to as a byproduct of being government funded through the licensing fees.

I'm pretty sure anyone from the UK could a for the data by request as they had to publish how much they pay their staff and showrunners compared to other channels/ streaming services.

Besides that excuse went out the window when they blamed poor rates on good weather..

permalink parent save report block reply
▲ 1 ▼
– deleted 1 point 2 years ago +1 / -0
▲ 2 ▼
– bamboozler1 2 points 2 years ago +2 / -0

'hot women bottle feeding newly born puppies'

Is... Is this a real thing?

Asking for a friend.

permalink parent save report block reply

Original 8chan Links to Gamer Gate:

.

The main GG discussion is on the videogames board: https://8chan.moe/v/

.

GamerGate archive is at https://8chan.moe/gamergatehq/

.

GamerGate Wiki:

https://ggwiki.deepfreeze.it/index.php/Main_Page

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Rules:

.

ONE: Do not advocate for illegal violence or post other illegal activity. (Be aware of your local laws.)

.

TWO: Don't threaten, harass, or impersonate users. Also: don't be a psycho. New users will be held to a higher standard.

.

THREE: Do not post porn.

.

FOUR: NSFW/NSFL content must be flaired NSFW.

.

FIVE: No vote manipulation. Do not break communities.win's features.

.

SIX: No spam or reposts. Do not make more than 5 threads a day.

.

SEVEN: Do not post falsehoods and hoaxes that are obvious to an uncontroversial degree.

. . . . . .

. . . . . .

Moderation Logs:

.

(Two different versions, Scored has more features and is cleaner, but .win let's you see a few more details in certain instances.)

  • Scored
  • .win

Moderators

  • DomitiusOfMassilia
  • C
  • BandageBandolier
  • CarmenOfSandiego
  • The_Shadow_of_Intent
  • SocraticMethod1
  • Kienan
  • Smith1980
Message the Moderators

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

2026.02.01 - whmbz (status)

Copyright © 2026.

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy