That article needs to be rewritten and any links to a better article need to be archived (The article itself uses archives).
I don't like either side in this 'conflict' but with the press as bad as it is we need to make sure any information shared is presented as accessible and verifiable as possible.
It reads like something from AboveTopSecret as it currently stands.
I just ignore all of it honestly, the whole region and the people who take sides on it are blatant scumbags and it shows every time an event pops up in the news. I'm sorry you can't make me care about the desert people in some foreign land especially when they come over and start shit constantly in my own country because they can't keep their third world ethnic conflicts to themselves.
Reuters and AP were both repeatedly played by stringers they were using to report on previous infitadas, so BBC putting out fake news is not a new thing, not for that region of the world.
Hamas and PLO are extremely skilled at media relations, and they love using the western press, because by and large the reporters sent to cover things are extremely dumb, ideologically bent, and don't check anything their stringers send to them.
Hamas and PLO are extremely skilled at media relations
We hear this all the time. Compared to whom, exactly? Because when I think of favorable media coverage, the people who are widely derided as terrorists don’t top my list.
It isn't all that skilled, compared to what someone in the west can do (see: Biden administration), but for 90IQ savages they do OK. It helps the western press over there covering things willfully ignore things that do not help the Narrative™, and that they are all cowards who hide in big, western hotels, and pay local stringers to bring them video and photos.
The White Helmets in Syria were one example. Intentional psyop expressly designed for western press coverage.
BBC has always been mud adgacent. No worries, these new laws will eventually ban Terrorist news networks in the UK. And hopefully the TikTok ban in the US leads to the same here.
That article needs to be rewritten and any links to a better article need to be archived (The article itself uses archives).
I don't like either side in this 'conflict' but with the press as bad as it is we need to make sure any information shared is presented as accessible and verifiable as possible.
It reads like something from AboveTopSecret as it currently stands.
I just ignore all of it honestly, the whole region and the people who take sides on it are blatant scumbags and it shows every time an event pops up in the news. I'm sorry you can't make me care about the desert people in some foreign land especially when they come over and start shit constantly in my own country because they can't keep their third world ethnic conflicts to themselves.
I wouldn't care about any of this shit if they weren't fucking up my country.
But if we support both sides, maybe they'll keep killing each other?
They’ve been killing each other for thousands of years before the United States existed. They don’t need the money to keep killing each other.
They must not be very good at it then.
All it's been doing is bumping weapons manufacturer stocks enabling politicians to profit from the public taking sides and doing shilling themselves.
It's almost worth it for entertainment value of watching groups of people who hate me tear each other apart.
It's like a really expensive pay per view fight.
Reuters and AP were both repeatedly played by stringers they were using to report on previous infitadas, so BBC putting out fake news is not a new thing, not for that region of the world.
Hamas and PLO are extremely skilled at media relations, and they love using the western press, because by and large the reporters sent to cover things are extremely dumb, ideologically bent, and don't check anything their stringers send to them.
We hear this all the time. Compared to whom, exactly? Because when I think of favorable media coverage, the people who are widely derided as terrorists don’t top my list.
It isn't all that skilled, compared to what someone in the west can do (see: Biden administration), but for 90IQ savages they do OK. It helps the western press over there covering things willfully ignore things that do not help the Narrative™, and that they are all cowards who hide in big, western hotels, and pay local stringers to bring them video and photos.
The White Helmets in Syria were one example. Intentional psyop expressly designed for western press coverage.
Comment Reported for Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Again, these are opinions
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
I'm not seeing intentional falsehoods here.
The Author of the article:
https://fathomjournal.org/author/david-collier/
Post Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
Post Approved: The post is arguing that the BBC spread falsehoods. I doubt the user believes it to be false.
BBC has always been mud adgacent. No worries, these new laws will eventually ban Terrorist news networks in the UK. And hopefully the TikTok ban in the US leads to the same here.
Comment Reported for: Rule 12 - Falsehoods
This is an opinion