Let's be fair. This is just her side of the story. We have no idea what went on with the guy who at least isn't publicly bitching about his ex so he's already got a leg up on emotional maturity
No disagreement here. But even if what she says is 100% truthful, her problem is still that she's a poor judge of potential partners.
Also, lots of cat ladies in the comments on that article. And holy fuck was that a lot of words in the article -- I made it only a couple pages in before I bailed.
I think a lot of it depends on when she joined this network of unhappy tradewifes group chat. Because women will actively make other women unhappy even if there's nothing to be really unhappy about
It waffles and repeats itself so hard you can just only read every third sentence and still get 90% of the story. Some of us have shit to do journo lady.
That's the one thing that gets missed in all of the right and left wing's screeching that men are bad and the manosphere are bad. The commentators saying this have a poor judge of character in men and come from a position of bias. If you are consistently having the same thing happen again and again to you, the problem isn't them, it's you. It's no different from the men who have issues with women.
I also think some of this comes down to the biological firmware that we all have which likely explains this line:
The tussle between men and women is a culture war as old as humanity itself.
I think there's also a big discrepancy between the proportion of good to bad.
I know many single guys, with incomes sufficient to support a family, from the ages of 25 - 40.
Every single woman I know either has kids, or double digit body counts. Most of them rely on government gibs and/or have zero savings or assets, financially.
Many men are prepared for marriage, while almost zero women can say the same.
There's is something regarding hard line ideological individuals that just attracts those with dark triad traits, abusive and deviant behaviour whether by male feminists readily catalogued on the left or the devout Christian conservatives on the right that will come out (as it did with closeted anti-gay conservative men in politics in the 80s and 90s). We've also seen the same thing happen in cults. There's something to be said to not become ideological and devout.
Why are women so fucking dumb about who they choose to hang out with? Even when they're in their late 20's and 30's they keep acting like they're rebellious teenagers telling mom and dad to fuck off and go get gangbanged by 6+ strangers.
I ran for local political office a few years ago and one of the things I was advised to do was to get makeup for TV appearances.
I'm a man, I don't wear makeup, subsequently I didn't win.
I don't think there's been a real conservative face since Nixon debated Kennedy. Who's the most exemplified conservative in the US? Ronald Reagan, a Hollywood actor.
None of these "online conservatives" are legit, they just made money exploiting the zeitgeist.
Let's be fair. This is just her side of the story. We have no idea what went on with the guy who at least isn't publicly bitching about his ex so he's already got a leg up on emotional maturity
No disagreement here. But even if what she says is 100% truthful, her problem is still that she's a poor judge of potential partners.
Also, lots of cat ladies in the comments on that article. And holy fuck was that a lot of words in the article -- I made it only a couple pages in before I bailed.
I think a lot of it depends on when she joined this network of unhappy tradewifes group chat. Because women will actively make other women unhappy even if there's nothing to be really unhappy about
It waffles and repeats itself so hard you can just only read every third sentence and still get 90% of the story. Some of us have shit to do journo lady.
Women refuse to be concise.
When you can't create an argument that's too airtight to critique you learn to create an argument that's too long to be worth correcting instead.
That's the one thing that gets missed in all of the right and left wing's screeching that men are bad and the manosphere are bad. The commentators saying this have a poor judge of character in men and come from a position of bias. If you are consistently having the same thing happen again and again to you, the problem isn't them, it's you. It's no different from the men who have issues with women.
I also think some of this comes down to the biological firmware that we all have which likely explains this line:
Men are more likely to at least admit they're the problem but lack the will or means to fix it.
I think there's also a big discrepancy between the proportion of good to bad.
I know many single guys, with incomes sufficient to support a family, from the ages of 25 - 40.
Every single woman I know either has kids, or double digit body counts. Most of them rely on government gibs and/or have zero savings or assets, financially.
Many men are prepared for marriage, while almost zero women can say the same.
There's is something regarding hard line ideological individuals that just attracts those with dark triad traits, abusive and deviant behaviour whether by male feminists readily catalogued on the left or the devout Christian conservatives on the right that will come out (as it did with closeted anti-gay conservative men in politics in the 80s and 90s). We've also seen the same thing happen in cults. There's something to be said to not become ideological and devout.
The telltale sign of stunted development.
The women today are the daughters of the first women to embrace feminism.
Feminist teachings literally result in their daughters intentionally dating abusive criminals to show off how "independent" they are.
You don't see actual conservatives in media.
I ran for local political office a few years ago and one of the things I was advised to do was to get makeup for TV appearances.
I'm a man, I don't wear makeup, subsequently I didn't win.
I don't think there's been a real conservative face since Nixon debated Kennedy. Who's the most exemplified conservative in the US? Ronald Reagan, a Hollywood actor.
None of these "online conservatives" are legit, they just made money exploiting the zeitgeist.
Yeah, the cons are just political theater. Not surprising the beautiful people are up to their usual shit.
Women never change. What they are in their teens they will always be. Hence why patriarchy is a requirement for pygmy level civilizations and up.
Ideology (feminism and tradwifery) are informed by culture which is informed by biology.
I did always wonder how she got so big, so fast, at such a young age...
So maybe there's something to that.
What is "couch casting behaviour", may I ask..?
The 'casting couch' is what Harvey Weinstein did: letting actresses earn their position on their backs.