Agitating a native population with mass introduction of outsiders who have a history of violent uprisings and even terrorism against a foreign regime and population
Slow claps
At this point, I'm just waiting for the car bombs to happen again...
I mean, the Irish voted for the idiots who are for mass immigration at first place, like they loved the British colonization so much and were coming back for more ... /s
Personal responsibility. Around the 2015 crisis, I've heard too many Irish being "welcoming" toward middle-east migrants.
At that point I don't feel sorry for any population who choses to destroy themselves with globalism. All the infos are out there about its consequences, in Europe, Australia, Canada,... US...
There's noone else in most countries - even antiimmigration populists just turn around immediately after an election, like that whore Meloni in Italy. Even if one tries, like earlier Salvini also in Italy, the system just buries them in lawsuits and likely blackmails them into submission.
The Brits voted in the Tories for more than a decade, and received far more immigrants under the "conservative" party than they did under Labour.
The Italians voted in a "far right" party under Meloni, and she oversaw an increase in illegal immigration and made it easier for migrants to arrive legally.
I'm not going to pretend to know the particulars of Irish national politics but in general there's a bigger problem here than getting people to not vote for the left.
Nice job blaming the victims, bro. European governments will go after citizens speaking out about the ongoing genocide of indigenous Europeans and accuse them of hate crimes, so do you really think they'd let a pro-White candidate campaign for office? No, if the Irish want to continue existing in Ireland, there is no political solution.
Oh I don't feel sorry for them in that respect, I just want it if they go that route for them to be SUCCESSFUL so people realise 'huh, the authorities aren't powerful enough to crush us if we use numbers and force'
You'll see A LOT of backpedelling in Europe alone if other natives copy Ireland's example...
Look at this motherfucker, feigning ignorance, pretending to not know who usually gets blamed for forced immigration around here. It's almost too much of a ragebait post, it's like you want people to start bashing the jews, just to defy you. Are you the taqiyya? Say something bad about Mohammed the pedo prophet.
When you inform your neighbors about the dangers of a globalist shitbag candidate they want to vote for and over 50% of them still do. What does one do? All the pre-destructive solutions are non-peaceful.
As ghey as democracy is, the problem stems from too many people ("politically inferior" I should say) voting.
Plato is quoted of talking about "ending up governed by your inferiors". It was in reference to non-participation in politics, but even so, if inferior people end up governing you, then the mistake was letting inferior people vote at all. If you only have two choices, then mistake was allowing a two-party system to take hold in the country at all. It's not that democracy is fake/ghey, it's the reality that universal sufferage is allowing the sheep to be led by the nose to their destruction. Sheep don't want to think, they just do, and don't want to make complex non-tribal decisions. Thus it becomes easy for wolves to subvert the herd and keep out any good, well-meaning shepherd.
The early-stage US combated this issue by disallowing voting from anyone who wasn't a landowning taxpaying male. It may not be appealing to the mass populace, but I've come to the conclusion that allowing the people who contribute back to society to decide it's fate is superior to autocratism, monarchism, collectivism, etc. But just like how wealth vanishes in three generations, the same happens in politics, at which I would argue human nature is doomed to the slavery-freedom cycle
Agitating a native population with mass introduction of outsiders who have a history of violent uprisings and even terrorism against a foreign regime and population
Slow claps
At this point, I'm just waiting for the car bombs to happen again...
I mean, the Irish voted for the idiots who are for mass immigration at first place, like they loved the British colonization so much and were coming back for more ... /s
Personal responsibility. Around the 2015 crisis, I've heard too many Irish being "welcoming" toward middle-east migrants.
At that point I don't feel sorry for any population who choses to destroy themselves with globalism. All the infos are out there about its consequences, in Europe, Australia, Canada,... US...
The White populations have never been asked in a vote about mass migration.
The only time I can remember was a referendum in Poland - where 96% voted against it.
Every vote for a liberal is a vote for mass immigration. Europe only elects liberals, so 100% of them want mass immigration.
They have never been asked.
I expect 90%+ would be against these levels of immigration.
In the US the politicians are chosen via (fair) primaries.
In Europe, the politicians are chosen via the elites. The public merely chooses red version or blue version.
There's noone else in most countries - even antiimmigration populists just turn around immediately after an election, like that whore Meloni in Italy. Even if one tries, like earlier Salvini also in Italy, the system just buries them in lawsuits and likely blackmails them into submission.
And yet people keep voting for leftists.
There's a point where you can't excuse the people and who they vote for.
The Brits voted in the Tories for more than a decade, and received far more immigrants under the "conservative" party than they did under Labour.
The Italians voted in a "far right" party under Meloni, and she oversaw an increase in illegal immigration and made it easier for migrants to arrive legally.
I'm not going to pretend to know the particulars of Irish national politics but in general there's a bigger problem here than getting people to not vote for the left.
Nice job blaming the victims, bro. European governments will go after citizens speaking out about the ongoing genocide of indigenous Europeans and accuse them of hate crimes, so do you really think they'd let a pro-White candidate campaign for office? No, if the Irish want to continue existing in Ireland, there is no political solution.
Oh I don't feel sorry for them in that respect, I just want it if they go that route for them to be SUCCESSFUL so people realise 'huh, the authorities aren't powerful enough to crush us if we use numbers and force'
You'll see A LOT of backpedelling in Europe alone if other natives copy Ireland's example...
Look at this motherfucker, feigning ignorance, pretending to not know who usually gets blamed for forced immigration around here. It's almost too much of a ragebait post, it's like you want people to start bashing the jews, just to defy you. Are you the taqiyya? Say something bad about Mohammed the pedo prophet.
OK sure, but on the other hand, when your PM is a gay Indian... that should've been a wakeup call.
I don't know, I go back and forth on how much culpability accrues to the native population. Was it too easy for us to believe the lies?
Bold of you to assume they wouldn't have gotten mass immigration no matter who they voted for.
When you inform your neighbors about the dangers of a globalist shitbag candidate they want to vote for and over 50% of them still do. What does one do? All the pre-destructive solutions are non-peaceful.
While the other 50% vote for the other party's globalist shitbag candidate. Democracy is fake and gay.
As ghey as democracy is, the problem stems from too many people ("politically inferior" I should say) voting.
Plato is quoted of talking about "ending up governed by your inferiors". It was in reference to non-participation in politics, but even so, if inferior people end up governing you, then the mistake was letting inferior people vote at all. If you only have two choices, then mistake was allowing a two-party system to take hold in the country at all. It's not that democracy is fake/ghey, it's the reality that universal sufferage is allowing the sheep to be led by the nose to their destruction. Sheep don't want to think, they just do, and don't want to make complex non-tribal decisions. Thus it becomes easy for wolves to subvert the herd and keep out any good, well-meaning shepherd.
The early-stage US combated this issue by disallowing voting from anyone who wasn't a landowning taxpaying male. It may not be appealing to the mass populace, but I've come to the conclusion that allowing the people who contribute back to society to decide it's fate is superior to autocratism, monarchism, collectivism, etc. But just like how wealth vanishes in three generations, the same happens in politics, at which I would argue human nature is doomed to the slavery-freedom cycle
no irishman voted to have a gay indian rule over them.
the irish went to war to leave the united kingdom and have their own nation.