https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UVbGeG7qV00
It's a longer video with a lot of rambling, but the title really says it all.
Western women used the franchise to usher in a gynocentric feminist society, which in turn gave them the "freedom" to pursue high paying careers at the expense of creating their own families. Those same women also voted for higher taxes, open borders, and massive welfare programs.
The end result of all this "progress"? All of the money they make in exchange for not having their own families is being heavily taxed by our governments in order to financially support hordes of lazy illegal immigrants (who multiply like rabbits).
Instead of Western women having their own husbands and kids and grandkids, they work 40+ hours a week for an uncaring corporate master only to then turn around and hand off half their paychecks to the government, who then distribute it to unemployed economic tourists from all over the non-white world (none of whom bother with "family planning" - unless you count planning to have 5+ children on the taxpayer's dime).
It would honestly be hilarious if it didn't also represent the impending collapse of Western civilization.
It's either that or date a non-Chad in their prime, and they're perfectly willing to destroy humanity before it comes to that.
The concept of "beta bux" is slowly being eroded as affirmative action, welfare and alloparenting structures replace the traditional family pair bonding model.
It's much worse than that. Normal birthrates would imply children living with their parents for at least eighteen years. But with reduced birthrates and increased immigration to compensate, there is an intrinsic higher demand for housing. For each child replaced with an immigrant, the eighteen year window to build new housing for the new adult becomes obliterated.
There are many other implications: school systems go down in quality (I believe it takes just two immigrant kids to lower the performance of the entire class), neighborhoods become unlivable, communities disintegrate, traffic congestion accelerates, waiting lists for medical appointments, waiting lists for dental appointments, etc.
High immigrant societies are generally trash, despite the claims of 'increased economic prosperity', which typically concentrates in the hands of just a few, whereas all the burdens of immigration are shouldered by the community at large.
What economic benefit is there other than cheap labor?
In geo-politics, the more people you have, the more influence you have.
Yes, however the US is already small relative to the influence it wields. Marginally, additional people are more power, however it is not true that more populous nations are always more powerful than less populous ones or anything even close to that.
What’s the best Rocky?
I would dispute even that as a benefit. As labor quality drops off a cliff, is it really worth even having that labor? I'd rather a native population be forced to address its own internal logistical issues rather than damn future generations to living in the ashes of a first world nation.
Yeah, but what rocky is the best?
The same people will observe that all new wealth accrues to top in one breath and then claim immigration raises all boats in another.
We've always been gynocentric from tribes to the modern day. Feminism is the politicisation of female nature. And this has been a thing before women were given suffrage. What changed is technology - the birth control pill, reduction in labour intensive jobs with health and safety laws, online dating and other changes.
This was off Asmongold's clip channel but basically shows what government involvement did to the dating scene alone.
Welfare fucked up everything, it made it easier for women to exclude men from raising a child and added a sense of entitlement into women's mentality. The result, feminist ideology got more entrenched into their heads that a lot of their talking points (misogyny, patriarchy etc) are used to justify the 'give me everything' attitude without even understanding the words and men feel more and more isolated outside the rare few guys that were lucky to find the few women that rejected this ideology, usually more rural and/or religious women.
Welfare not only fucked up the gender dynamics but also race too, I guarantee you, Black people in America would not have as many issues today if it wasn't for Welfare. Caring for those on hard times should've been left to local communities and religious institutions who were probably not just using it for reputation gain but scouting on who they might be able to turn into a dedicated and committed follower.
Ehh... I'm not so sure of that anymore...
I saw a newspaper clipping from the 1950s (and I'm kicking myself for not saving it to my computer) that showed crime statistics by race, which if true, potentially paints black crime as always having been a problem.
The stat it showed was (going off of memory here) despite being 10% of the population at the time, they made up 50% of all arrests. Maybe you could put that down to pre-1960s discrimination, but after having the misfortune of witnessing what felt like hours of on the ground footage of the 2020 riots as they happened, everything is in question.
I did say 'As many issues', never said they wouldn't have issues.
Though them not getting welfare and by consequence less fatherless families (at least on the white side) probably means they'd have less support to do a full scale looting and riots like we've seen.
Fair enough. It's just for all I think I know, and all the lessons I've learned post-GG1, there is a lot I still need to unlearn having been put through the CA education system as a child and teen (particularly in the history department).
1950s? Bruh the ancient egyptians knew what was up in 1950 BC: https://i.imgur.com/v96gKWX.jpeg
From the comments:
lol first time hearing that one
Almost like it all was intentional and a weapon against White, Christian countries by international foreigners.
Savagely brilliant. I had never seen it from that angle.
Ayy, I just saw that video yesterday.