Sussman suggests that the cause is the “deterioration in relations between women and men”. “I think the most fundamental issue at hand is that a lot of girls realize that they don’t really have to do this anymore,” one South Korean women tells the author. “They can just opt out.”
WGTOW is just as hilariously self defeating as political lesbianism. Women are the ones who benefit from relationshits, not men. It's no skin off our asses if they go earn their own living instead of leeching off us and controlling our lives and living spaces. They're only good for sex and even then the price isn't worth it unless you're Chad.
the truth of the matter is that birth rates are not falling evenly across the whole world
Translation: The shitskins are breeding like rats, and while they back female supremacists for gibs they'll put the project in mortal danger if the feminists ever lose control of the clown show. Unlike the GOP, the shitskins won't stay content as feminist house niggers.
Pure insanity. Women are happiest being mothers. There are exceptions but the majority of women do not find happiness by working their way up the corporate ladder.
The problem is women will wait forever for their booty call to wife them up rather than settle for a nice guy.
Women haven't exerted selection choice on their mating choices for thousands of years (when marriage was a handhsake between father and groom.) they literally are not evolved enough to breed optimally.
Even if there were some kind of pro-civilization evolutionary pressure the less than 10000 years of civilization is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of years of evolution that led to their shitty mating choices. To make a dent in the problem we would have to allow women who fuck shitty men and their offspring to starve for death for tens or hundreds of thousands of generations. They would have to be given the freedom to make those shitty choices so their bad mating choices could be bred out, and civilization would die long before we saw any improvement. That's why marriage was a handshake between father and groom to begin with. The betas aren't going to underwrite civilization when women's deadbeat fucktoys get all the benefits.
It's a common misunderstanding between evolution and natural selection that everything has to take tens of thousands of year to change.
It takes that long to evolve new heritable traits.
But natural selection can take an already existing phenotype from 1% prevalence to 90+% prevalent, or vice versa, in just a few generations. If the selection pressures are strong enough.
The difference between a problem solvable in 60 years or one solvable in >10,000 is if good enough women currently exist.
There's no such thing as WGTOW, women just won't leave men alone. Remember how a bunch of feminists infiltrated some coomer gacha game to hide the Megalia hand symbol in some promotional videos?
I agree wholeheartedly. I've been single for years and besides the occasional pang in the heart wishing that there were actually any good women to be hand, I just jerk it and move on with my day and forget about women.
It's not a hate thing even. I just don't care. I do my job, do the things I want, hang out with friends, jerk it and occasionally bang a girl. I also agree women subsist off of men like parasites, which is why I don't keep any around.
I'd much rather go the traditional route but my autism shakes me like a dog and I think about how the juice isn't worth the squeeze in this relationship economy. I'd have to have a few dozen failed relationships before I find a half decent girl these days, and I just can't be bothered to deal with all that fucking nonsense.
If a good girl ever comes along and plops into my lap, fine, I'll bite. But I'm not searching.
WGTOW is just as hilariously self defeating as political lesbianism. Women are the ones who benefit from relationshits, not men. It's no skin off our asses if they go earn their own living instead of leeching off us and controlling our lives and living spaces. They're only good for sex and even then the price isn't worth it unless you're Chad.
Translation: The shitskins are breeding like rats, and while they back female supremacists for gibs they'll put the project in mortal danger if the feminists ever lose control of the clown show. Unlike the GOP, the shitskins won't stay content as feminist house niggers.
Pure insanity. Women are happiest being mothers. There are exceptions but the majority of women do not find happiness by working their way up the corporate ladder.
I would correct that to sleeping, in many cases, but otherwise yes, lol…
The problem is women will wait forever for their booty call to wife them up rather than settle for a nice guy.
Women haven't exerted selection choice on their mating choices for thousands of years (when marriage was a handhsake between father and groom.) they literally are not evolved enough to breed optimally.
Even if there were some kind of pro-civilization evolutionary pressure the less than 10000 years of civilization is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of years of evolution that led to their shitty mating choices. To make a dent in the problem we would have to allow women who fuck shitty men and their offspring to starve for death for tens or hundreds of thousands of generations. They would have to be given the freedom to make those shitty choices so their bad mating choices could be bred out, and civilization would die long before we saw any improvement. That's why marriage was a handshake between father and groom to begin with. The betas aren't going to underwrite civilization when women's deadbeat fucktoys get all the benefits.
It's a common misunderstanding between evolution and natural selection that everything has to take tens of thousands of year to change.
It takes that long to evolve new heritable traits.
But natural selection can take an already existing phenotype from 1% prevalence to 90+% prevalent, or vice versa, in just a few generations. If the selection pressures are strong enough.
The difference between a problem solvable in 60 years or one solvable in >10,000 is if good enough women currently exist.
There's no such thing as WGTOW, women just won't leave men alone. Remember how a bunch of feminists infiltrated some coomer gacha game to hide the Megalia hand symbol in some promotional videos?
Women are wired to demand male attention; if left alone, they would get eaten by wildlife.
Which is why they vote for access to mens' wallets through welfare programs rather than doing it on their backs the old fashioned way.
If you think about it a huge part of feminism is finding ways to exploit betas while denying them any benefits whatsoever.
Feminism is women's complete abdication of responsibility.
I agree wholeheartedly. I've been single for years and besides the occasional pang in the heart wishing that there were actually any good women to be hand, I just jerk it and move on with my day and forget about women.
It's not a hate thing even. I just don't care. I do my job, do the things I want, hang out with friends, jerk it and occasionally bang a girl. I also agree women subsist off of men like parasites, which is why I don't keep any around.
I'd much rather go the traditional route but my autism shakes me like a dog and I think about how the juice isn't worth the squeeze in this relationship economy. I'd have to have a few dozen failed relationships before I find a half decent girl these days, and I just can't be bothered to deal with all that fucking nonsense.
If a good girl ever comes along and plops into my lap, fine, I'll bite. But I'm not searching.