Pure insanity. Women are happiest being mothers. There are exceptions but the majority of women do not find happiness by working their way up the corporate ladder.
The problem is women will wait forever for their booty call to wife them up rather than settle for a nice guy.
Women haven't exerted selection choice on their mating choices for thousands of years (when marriage was a handhsake between father and groom.) they literally are not evolved enough to breed optimally.
Even if there were some kind of pro-civilization evolutionary pressure the less than 10000 years of civilization is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of years of evolution that led to their shitty mating choices. To make a dent in the problem we would have to allow women who fuck shitty men and their offspring to starve for death for tens or hundreds of thousands of generations. They would have to be given the freedom to make those shitty choices so their bad mating choices could be bred out, and civilization would die long before we saw any improvement. That's why marriage was a handshake between father and groom to begin with. The betas aren't going to underwrite civilization when women's deadbeat fucktoys get all the benefits.
It's a common misunderstanding between evolution and natural selection that everything has to take tens of thousands of year to change.
It takes that long to evolve new heritable traits.
But natural selection can take an already existing phenotype from 1% prevalence to 90+% prevalent, or vice versa, in just a few generations. If the selection pressures are strong enough.
The difference between a problem solvable in 60 years or one solvable in >10,000 is if good enough women currently exist.
Pure insanity. Women are happiest being mothers. There are exceptions but the majority of women do not find happiness by working their way up the corporate ladder.
I would correct that to sleeping, in many cases, but otherwise yes, lol…
The problem is women will wait forever for their booty call to wife them up rather than settle for a nice guy.
Women haven't exerted selection choice on their mating choices for thousands of years (when marriage was a handhsake between father and groom.) they literally are not evolved enough to breed optimally.
Even if there were some kind of pro-civilization evolutionary pressure the less than 10000 years of civilization is a drop in the bucket compared to the millions of years of evolution that led to their shitty mating choices. To make a dent in the problem we would have to allow women who fuck shitty men and their offspring to starve for death for tens or hundreds of thousands of generations. They would have to be given the freedom to make those shitty choices so their bad mating choices could be bred out, and civilization would die long before we saw any improvement. That's why marriage was a handshake between father and groom to begin with. The betas aren't going to underwrite civilization when women's deadbeat fucktoys get all the benefits.
It's a common misunderstanding between evolution and natural selection that everything has to take tens of thousands of year to change.
It takes that long to evolve new heritable traits.
But natural selection can take an already existing phenotype from 1% prevalence to 90+% prevalent, or vice versa, in just a few generations. If the selection pressures are strong enough.
The difference between a problem solvable in 60 years or one solvable in >10,000 is if good enough women currently exist.