Do you have names for any of these "right wingers" that you called out for this? Even better, do you have any names of people on this board that you've been calling out?
Or is this just another of your "I'm smarter than everybody" posts?
Because you're not smarter than everybody. That's why you get downvoted.
You say dumb shit sometimes. Your knee jerk "right wingers" when you are referring neocons, establishment twits and various other groups is so unspecific that it comes off as retarded.
You don't have a very good grasp of what "right wing" and "left wing" actually mean, because you're aligning cultural stereotypes with political ideologies. That's why you get downvoted when you say "right wingers". Because it comes off as "enlightened centrist" ignorance when you slander everybody when you're referring to groups that aren't inherently tied to the right wing to begin with.
Everyone knows the point around the political compass where anyone to the right of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin is far-right. Potentially controversial opinion but we may now be seeing the concept being pushed that anyone to the left of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher is a Marxist.
Perhaps you should look at Regan's stances, since there isn't much difference between him and Biden. They pretty much have the same polices in everything except government spending and environmental regulations.
In other words, Regan and Biden were pro gun control, pro amnesty, pro "free" trade, pro civil "rights", pro faggots, and Regan appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court (Sandra Day O'Connor. FFS, Regan voted for FDR 4 times.
So if you are not a fence sitter, and you are attacking the right, then you are a leftist.
I don't automatically simp for the right therefore leftist is his position apparently.
When you proclaim that you were right about something in a condescending way and accuse supposed allies with broad strokes (instead of hitting the proper targets), it upsets the retards. It makes yourself look dumb, so I would again encourage you to stop doing it. It's no use flashing your plumage like a peacock when all it does is arouse anger in some hard-head types who can't comprehend beyond the "us vs. them" binary. Body language and intonation are missing from online discussions, and even though people have different ideas of what certain words mean, you have to understand the local context of where you're posting and be careful with word choice
You're officially as bad as a games journalist for posting that if you mean it and also as dumb as one for giving people the full context of my post and the only people who are upvoting you are retards who didn't bother reading the post.
The wannabe puritan luddite right-wingers are pathetic. Their idea of the ideal human basically amounts to becoming gardeners and popping out children like good farm animals. They supposedly reject modernity but they benefit from all the comforts afforded to them thanks to modernity. They are way too judgmental of people for all wrong reasons to ever be considered good people. Like at the end of the day it matters not whether you get enjoyment from taking a hike vs. playing a video game but they act like it makes all the difference about a person's character.
You are right to hate them and you are right to call them right-wingers. Many of these right-wingers would reject the "right-wingers" on this group for being "degenerate" because they like video games, anime or big titties. Personally, as time goes on, I'm starting to hate this brand of right-winger almost more than I hate leftists. Leftists are misguided but this brand of right-winger is willfully hateful and judgmental for the wrong reasons with 0 ounce of sympathy or compassion. If you think they're bad online, they are worse in-person. Not good people to be around at all because of their misguided air of superiority. Many leftists want to do good but don't know how such that they end up committing evil but you can tell they're good people deep-down whereas I consider these brand of right-wingers as willingly engaging in evil. I suppose at the end of the day the right-wing and the left-wing both have good and evil people caught up on the wing. This brand of right-winger you bring up happens to often have a lot of the evil ones as far as I'm concerned.
You are right to hate them and you are right to call them right-wingers. Many of these right-wingers would reject the "right-wingers" on this group for being "degenerate" because they like video games, anime or big titties
I think it would be better to say that this issue is more rooted in what defines a "right-winger". There are other pieces to this political puzzle that need to be included when making bold claims. Lethn reaches for the false dichotomy like many others and just calls on right-wingers entirely, instead of being more specific in his claims, and that's why he gets slapped around a lot.
Many leftists want to do good but don't know how such that they end up committing evil but you can tell they're good people deep-down whereas I consider these brand of right-wingers as willingly engaging in evil.
I can't strictly dispute the many, but that's just because in a world with 7+ billion people that's a very easy bar to pass.
I would say that most leftists don't care about being good so much as appearing and being thought of as good. My experience is that even the more reasonable sounding ones are still willing to publicly support things they privately confide they think might be harmful rather than risk a tarnished reputation. Turning a blind eye and willful ignorance of the reality of things seems just as much a plausible deniability defense mechanism for their social capital as it is a genuine oversight.
I believe only a small minority of people who genuinely want to be good could experience present day clownworld and not think to re-examine some of the things they are told. The problem is that good people are now even a Western minority, regardless of political affiliation. As a group they forgot the only way altruism survives in a society is if they are militantly protectionist of each other first and foremost so that they can cooperatively outcompete the self-centered, and are now on the verge of extinction for allowing themselves and each other to be exploited and pushed out of almost all positions of power. Fathers failed several generations ago to sufficiently impart that even though living conditions had improved greatly we still don't have the resources to help everyone and if you value the future survival of kindness you have to make hard choices that go contrary to your good nature for the sake of the community.
Personally, as time goes on, I'm starting to hate this brand of right-winger almost more than I hate leftists. Leftists are misguided but this brand of right-winger is willfully hateful and judgmental for the wrong reasons with 0 ounce of sympathy or compassion. If you think they're bad online, they are worse in-person.
I guess I'm missing something, because this type of person seems like an endangered species nowadays. The last time I can remember somebody crapping on video games vs. the outdoors was in summer camp and that guy is probably less militant now than he was then. Games aren't novel anymore, they're part of the background noise.
I also find that zoomers don't seem to have the strong defensive attitudes that millennials had about games. Puritan threats to gaming aren't credible anymore, and why get worked up about defending mediocrity that everyone kind of knows is goyslop anyway?
Well, I'm a millennial so there's still a lot of these summer camp guys and girls out there. You're just unlikely to encounter them as readily as you would have when you were younger. I remember 5 years ago when I was 30yo working downtown a major city with a bunch of other people around my age, if someone asked you what you did on the weekend and you answered "played video games", you'd be regarded as a loser. Everyone instead would talk about "went to the mountains, went camping, travelled to X place, etc..." or something to that effect. If you weren't spending your weekends going somewhere outdoors then you were a loser. Maybe that has changed but for some reason, I doubt it.
I chalk most of your retardation up to being 1) a “secret king” gamma and 2) European.
Number two means you have no idea what a conservative even looks like because your “right wing” in the UK is entirely leftist.
Number one is just a product of your birth and childhood. You’re a midwit and a narcissist, so you must always project the appearance of a “very smart boy”. It’s an insufferable personality type that will do more to isolate you than any political or cultural “hot take” ever will.
Do you have names for any of these "right wingers" that you called out for this? Even better, do you have any names of people on this board that you've been calling out?
Or is this just another of your "I'm smarter than everybody" posts?
Because you're not smarter than everybody. That's why you get downvoted.
Come on man, at least finish the paragraph before you contradict yourself. At least you waited until a little later for:
That's basically the same line of thought as Imp uses, so that gives an idea of the crowd he's keeping in terms of brain power.
You say dumb shit sometimes. Your knee jerk "right wingers" when you are referring neocons, establishment twits and various other groups is so unspecific that it comes off as retarded.
You don't have a very good grasp of what "right wing" and "left wing" actually mean, because you're aligning cultural stereotypes with political ideologies. That's why you get downvoted when you say "right wingers". Because it comes off as "enlightened centrist" ignorance when you slander everybody when you're referring to groups that aren't inherently tied to the right wing to begin with.
Pure fucking projection.
Git Gud.
Keeping people like you away.
Everyone knows the point around the political compass where anyone to the right of Karl Marx and Vladimir Lenin is far-right. Potentially controversial opinion but we may now be seeing the concept being pushed that anyone to the left of Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher is a Marxist.
Perhaps you should look at Regan's stances, since there isn't much difference between him and Biden. They pretty much have the same polices in everything except government spending and environmental regulations.
In other words, Regan and Biden were pro gun control, pro amnesty, pro "free" trade, pro civil "rights", pro faggots, and Regan appointed the first woman to the Supreme Court (Sandra Day O'Connor. FFS, Regan voted for FDR 4 times.
When you proclaim that you were right about something in a condescending way and accuse supposed allies with broad strokes (instead of hitting the proper targets), it upsets the retards. It makes yourself look dumb, so I would again encourage you to stop doing it. It's no use flashing your plumage like a peacock when all it does is arouse anger in some hard-head types who can't comprehend beyond the "us vs. them" binary. Body language and intonation are missing from online discussions, and even though people have different ideas of what certain words mean, you have to understand the local context of where you're posting and be careful with word choice
You:
Also you: attacking the right.
So if you are not a fence sitter, and you are attacking the right, then you are a leftist.
Then the is the fact that you hate when people add context to your posts.
I bet you sperg out about community notes too.
The wannabe puritan luddite right-wingers are pathetic. Their idea of the ideal human basically amounts to becoming gardeners and popping out children like good farm animals. They supposedly reject modernity but they benefit from all the comforts afforded to them thanks to modernity. They are way too judgmental of people for all wrong reasons to ever be considered good people. Like at the end of the day it matters not whether you get enjoyment from taking a hike vs. playing a video game but they act like it makes all the difference about a person's character.
You are right to hate them and you are right to call them right-wingers. Many of these right-wingers would reject the "right-wingers" on this group for being "degenerate" because they like video games, anime or big titties. Personally, as time goes on, I'm starting to hate this brand of right-winger almost more than I hate leftists. Leftists are misguided but this brand of right-winger is willfully hateful and judgmental for the wrong reasons with 0 ounce of sympathy or compassion. If you think they're bad online, they are worse in-person. Not good people to be around at all because of their misguided air of superiority. Many leftists want to do good but don't know how such that they end up committing evil but you can tell they're good people deep-down whereas I consider these brand of right-wingers as willingly engaging in evil. I suppose at the end of the day the right-wing and the left-wing both have good and evil people caught up on the wing. This brand of right-winger you bring up happens to often have a lot of the evil ones as far as I'm concerned.
I think it would be better to say that this issue is more rooted in what defines a "right-winger". There are other pieces to this political puzzle that need to be included when making bold claims. Lethn reaches for the false dichotomy like many others and just calls on right-wingers entirely, instead of being more specific in his claims, and that's why he gets slapped around a lot.
I can't strictly dispute the many, but that's just because in a world with 7+ billion people that's a very easy bar to pass.
I would say that most leftists don't care about being good so much as appearing and being thought of as good. My experience is that even the more reasonable sounding ones are still willing to publicly support things they privately confide they think might be harmful rather than risk a tarnished reputation. Turning a blind eye and willful ignorance of the reality of things seems just as much a plausible deniability defense mechanism for their social capital as it is a genuine oversight.
I believe only a small minority of people who genuinely want to be good could experience present day clownworld and not think to re-examine some of the things they are told. The problem is that good people are now even a Western minority, regardless of political affiliation. As a group they forgot the only way altruism survives in a society is if they are militantly protectionist of each other first and foremost so that they can cooperatively outcompete the self-centered, and are now on the verge of extinction for allowing themselves and each other to be exploited and pushed out of almost all positions of power. Fathers failed several generations ago to sufficiently impart that even though living conditions had improved greatly we still don't have the resources to help everyone and if you value the future survival of kindness you have to make hard choices that go contrary to your good nature for the sake of the community.
I guess I'm missing something, because this type of person seems like an endangered species nowadays. The last time I can remember somebody crapping on video games vs. the outdoors was in summer camp and that guy is probably less militant now than he was then. Games aren't novel anymore, they're part of the background noise.
I also find that zoomers don't seem to have the strong defensive attitudes that millennials had about games. Puritan threats to gaming aren't credible anymore, and why get worked up about defending mediocrity that everyone kind of knows is goyslop anyway?
Well, I'm a millennial so there's still a lot of these summer camp guys and girls out there. You're just unlikely to encounter them as readily as you would have when you were younger. I remember 5 years ago when I was 30yo working downtown a major city with a bunch of other people around my age, if someone asked you what you did on the weekend and you answered "played video games", you'd be regarded as a loser. Everyone instead would talk about "went to the mountains, went camping, travelled to X place, etc..." or something to that effect. If you weren't spending your weekends going somewhere outdoors then you were a loser. Maybe that has changed but for some reason, I doubt it.
Yeah I mean sure but calling them worse than leftists? Your beef with them has to be bigger than anti-gaming snobbery.
I chalk most of your retardation up to being 1) a “secret king” gamma and 2) European.
Number two means you have no idea what a conservative even looks like because your “right wing” in the UK is entirely leftist.
Number one is just a product of your birth and childhood. You’re a midwit and a narcissist, so you must always project the appearance of a “very smart boy”. It’s an insufferable personality type that will do more to isolate you than any political or cultural “hot take” ever will.