"Billions spent of weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of the victims. Although people are suffering in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species."
Meanwhile, China is licking its lips. The CCP tyrants don’t give a whit about human rights, and they certainly aren’t going to worry about “enslaving” flora, fauna, and geological features.
I am glad the article brought up this point. They could also throw India and Brazil in there too, or any developing nations. This is more lefty foolishness, put forth by people who love the idea but would be absolutely miserable and likely dead if such a system were to come about.
Nature-rights laws empower radical greens to go to court to stop any use of the natural world with which they disapprove. “Ecocide” would make large mining and energy-extraction development a heinous crime.
This is the main point, really.
Does nature include the plants and animals involved in farming? Weeds? Invasive species? Pets? Pests? Non-maintained forests (aka fire hazards)? Oils found underground? What do you think for water?
Every thing that exists affects something else. How do we live without manipulating or consuming anything?
Why not just go out and say you want to dictate every facet of human existence? Roughly half of all westerners will fall in line automatically anyways. They will ultimately achieve our destruction.
Rights that are respected by governments have corresponding responsibilities. If you murder someone, you go to jail, which is a massive violation of your rights.
If "nature" doesn't have the agency required to decide to obey the law that respects those rights, it doesn't have rights.
Humans don't have natural rights, but nature has human rights. Well, alrighty then.
The important part isn't to grant nature rights, but to use those rights to remove your own.
"Billions spent of weapons to humanely murder other humans. Rights of criminals are given more respect than the privacy of the victims. Although people are suffering in poverty, huge donations are made to protect endangered species."
In the middle ages we often hear of animals being put on trial and laugh at how stupid and backwards they were.
Just something to think about.
At least they could define the word "woman".
Rest in power Mary the Elephant #SayHerName
I am glad the article brought up this point. They could also throw India and Brazil in there too, or any developing nations. This is more lefty foolishness, put forth by people who love the idea but would be absolutely miserable and likely dead if such a system were to come about.
Eradicate the U.N.
It's long overdue. I've been saying it for years now. Ever since I first found out about this.
https://archive.is/https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/ageing/replacement-migration.asp
They're a subversive organization and a tool for globalist bullshit.
This is the main point, really.
Does nature include the plants and animals involved in farming? Weeds? Invasive species? Pets? Pests? Non-maintained forests (aka fire hazards)? Oils found underground? What do you think for water?
Every thing that exists affects something else. How do we live without manipulating or consuming anything?
Why not just go out and say you want to dictate every facet of human existence? Roughly half of all westerners will fall in line automatically anyways. They will ultimately achieve our destruction.
Nature will include everything that isn't a human fetus.
This is really, really, simple.
Rights that are respected by governments have corresponding responsibilities. If you murder someone, you go to jail, which is a massive violation of your rights.
If "nature" doesn't have the agency required to decide to obey the law that respects those rights, it doesn't have rights.
Done.
This ought to be good. They should ask Marduk for his expertise.
Humans rights are designed to restrict your natural rights.
The UN needs to vanish in a cloud of incandescent plasma.