At this point, some opponents of settler colonialism might reply that historically distant examples of settler colonialism don’t justify current instances of it. But how ancient, really, is the Wounded Knee massacre of 1890, the last major battle between Native Americans and the U.S. Army? What about the American invasion of the Hawaiian kingdom three years later?
It’s fine to oppose settler colonialism, but in that case, one also must be consistent and principled. To say that Israel alone must be eliminated on grounds of settler colonialism while giving a pass to other cases of settler colonialism is a double standard that is hard to describe as anything but antisemitic.
Oh. I guess that explains why Jewish academics are so intent on undermining America's origins.
As it is, most Israelis were born to Israeli parents and grandparents, and many can trace their heritage in the land many more generations back. At least a few Israelis have grandparents who fought British colonialism, especially after World War II.
Click that link. It's in the actual article. This reptilian bastard had the audacity to brag about the KING DAVID HOTEL BOMBING as some kind of leftist credit to Israelis. I'm gobsmacked. A Jew repping Jewish terrorism in the cold light of day. 91 people dead, mostly British and Arabs, and this guy is bragging about it.
I love how every bit of this is projection when you see the leftists flooding this country with the least compatible foreigners and demanding everyone else surrender their culture to them.
I would accept being relocated to rural Normandy, where the vast majority of my ancestors are from ( the rest being 99%+ from north-western Europe ) if, an only if, this means all non-Whites are removed from Europe and any attempt from them to live there is swiftly met with deadly force.
Ideally this would be followed by partitions of the arbitrary political lines to establish a homeland for every White ethno-linguistic group, with White cooperation, but no "melting pot" bullshit.
Non-White removals has to come first, of course. Because you cannot trust words, only results.
The "first nations and inuits" will likely be begging for Whites to come back ( and spit in our face once they get comfortable again ).
I would accept being relocated to rural Normandy, where the vast majority of my ancestors are from
Brave of you to assume that the white people currently living in rural Normandy would even want you in their land because you are have the some skin colour as them and apparently have ancestors from there, who left some time ago. Do you speak French fluently? Are you a practising Catholic? Are you culturally the same as those currently living in Normandy and whose ancestors have stayed rooted there for generations?
Fair enough. But are you sure the people in Normandy would actually want you there? That is the problem with any ideas like this - most people are protective of their land. They do not take kindly to what they may perceive as 'outsiders' taking their land. This would lead to conflict and distrust. It is not a way to build robust societies.
Let's not pretend that Hamas/Palastine doesn't want to take over the entire region of themselves. It was Palestine that refused to sign the Two State agreement.
And if you think that this is some firm of support for Israel, go touch grass.
Should this ancient history, interesting or inspiring as it is, matter? In the final analysis, no.
Israel is justified by being a sovereign state that commands the loyalty of its citizens, not by the precedents of antiquity. Ditto for the United States and every other state, whatever the nature of its origins. History is lived forward, not back, and the goal of politics and diplomacy is to make life as livable for as many people as possible, not to re-adjudicate ancient rights or wrongs. That should be a motto for Palestinians, too, in the hopes of a future state based on something better than current grievances or past glories.
I agree, native American indians can kiss my ass. Their destiny was to be conquered by someone eventually.
Yes.
The US government isn’t trying to send billions of dollars to Russia. They’re trying to send billions of dollars to Israel.
No matter where you stand on the issue unless you’re a fucking snake you have to admit that changes the equation a little bit.
What a shit article
Bret speaks of atonement when Israel is doing shit now that they could simply stop doing.
Shutup, nerd.
Y'all are the best at digging tunnels. I'm so jelly.
Too bad this doesn't work on you.
faggot
Niggerfaggot detected
i'll stop when they learn to behave with appropriate humility.
Never forget the USS Liberty.
Oh. I guess that explains why Jewish academics are so intent on undermining America's origins.
Click that link. It's in the actual article. This reptilian bastard had the audacity to brag about the KING DAVID HOTEL BOMBING as some kind of leftist credit to Israelis. I'm gobsmacked. A Jew repping Jewish terrorism in the cold light of day. 91 people dead, mostly British and Arabs, and this guy is bragging about it.
I love how every bit of this is projection when you see the leftists flooding this country with the least compatible foreigners and demanding everyone else surrender their culture to them.
I would accept being relocated to rural Normandy, where the vast majority of my ancestors are from ( the rest being 99%+ from north-western Europe ) if, an only if, this means all non-Whites are removed from Europe and any attempt from them to live there is swiftly met with deadly force.
Ideally this would be followed by partitions of the arbitrary political lines to establish a homeland for every White ethno-linguistic group, with White cooperation, but no "melting pot" bullshit.
Non-White removals has to come first, of course. Because you cannot trust words, only results.
The "first nations and inuits" will likely be begging for Whites to come back ( and spit in our face once they get comfortable again ).
Brave of you to assume that the white people currently living in rural Normandy would even want you in their land because you are have the some skin colour as them and apparently have ancestors from there, who left some time ago. Do you speak French fluently? Are you a practising Catholic? Are you culturally the same as those currently living in Normandy and whose ancestors have stayed rooted there for generations?
J'ai pas besoin de m' faire des accroires.
I am a Catholic and speak French in a dialect which evolved straight from Normand and French, as does all my family.
Meilleure chance la prochaine fois, pense-bon.
Fair enough. But are you sure the people in Normandy would actually want you there? That is the problem with any ideas like this - most people are protective of their land. They do not take kindly to what they may perceive as 'outsiders' taking their land. This would lead to conflict and distrust. It is not a way to build robust societies.
Let's not pretend that Hamas/Palastine doesn't want to take over the entire region of themselves. It was Palestine that refused to sign the Two State agreement.
And if you think that this is some firm of support for Israel, go touch grass.
I don’t think you’ll find many “Free Palestine” people around here. More of a “let them fight” crowd.
Only if I can purge it the way Israel wishes they could purge Gaza.
Also fuck you, we conquered this land fair and square.
I agree, native American indians can kiss my ass. Their destiny was to be conquered by someone eventually.