It's realistic. Blacks are always committing crimes. They deserve to be treated with suspicion. If blacks want better they should police themselves better. Instead they would rather maintain a narrative that this treatment is unwarranted.
Not realistic at all, every employee wouldn’t give a shit since they don’t get paid enough and carrying a concealed weapon in a movie theater is banned in like 90% of places and even if he did draw it all he would do is damn his family for years as NBC and CNN drags his body into the streets labeling him a “racist bigot”.
What WOULD be realistic is if the black guy was wearing thug attire, blasting incomprehensible Ebonics, and then got pissed and threatened to beat the white woman over the counter.
As someone who has to model and apply foundational STEM concepts onto to real world applications. Nah it ain't, unfortunately. It gets so many layers deep if you want the fully precise truth.
But the scripts vapid celebrities and their sycophant writers come up with? They sure as hell are. Any attempt to justify them longer than a couple of sentences only deserves distain and a "It ain't that deep bro'."
When they asked people how many unarmed black people they thought were gunned down by police in America every year, the numbers were staggering. 10k, 100k, and up. That year it was something like 7-13.
You’re statistically more likely to get stuck by lightning and die than to be a black unarmed citizen who gets shot and killed by police. Thats an actual fact
I can say the whole rigamarole shown in the clip isn't even a uniquely race thing.
I've seen plenty of my white trash friends and relatives go through similar "passive aggressive trying to get rid of you." Its a class thing, with the general assumption being that the poor and/or less sophisticated will bring trouble and aren't even worth associating with, but you can't outright tell them to leave without creating a scene. The problem of course being, every black person looks poor and/or like they will bring trouble so it is a much more common thing on their end.
I don't even blame the people for doing it, because most of the time they have good reason to do so and not a lot of reasons not to prevent the risk.
The scab that is being picked here though is that the whole George Floyd thing started with a teller contacting the police because he paid for this purchase with a bill above his apparent pay grade.
And the teller pointed them at a convicted armed robber in the middle of a drug deal. How can you argue that George Floyd was the victim of racial profiling without making it evidence that racial profiling works?
Nobody gets called out for being black, you DO get called out for being black and SUSPICIOUS though. You’d think this would make the black community act more carefully and culturally competent but instead they think everyone else is the problem and that they should embrace thug culture as a counter movement. Meanwhile any actual competent black people get called “uncle Toms” for wanting their race to not be seen as violent animals.
He knew who Floyd was insomuch as he knew he was the guy who just tried to pay with a counterfeit bill. That alone is perfectly valid grounds for calling the cops, you don't have to call it "profiling"?
It's realistic. Blacks are always committing crimes. They deserve to be treated with suspicion. If blacks want better they should police themselves better. Instead they would rather maintain a narrative that this treatment is unwarranted.
It's warranted.
Not realistic at all, every employee wouldn’t give a shit since they don’t get paid enough and carrying a concealed weapon in a movie theater is banned in like 90% of places and even if he did draw it all he would do is damn his family for years as NBC and CNN drags his body into the streets labeling him a “racist bigot”.
What WOULD be realistic is if the black guy was wearing thug attire, blasting incomprehensible Ebonics, and then got pissed and threatened to beat the white woman over the counter.
Every time a liberal uses that many words, you can be sure they don't even understand it.
It's just a collection of big words that is supposed to quantify an emotional reaction to something into empirical data... and it never will be.
The truth is almost always simple. Lies require complex explanations.
Remember to apply this principle when scrutinizing some of the more verbose posters here.
Giz and Lethn on suicide watch.
As someone who has to model and apply foundational STEM concepts onto to real world applications. Nah it ain't, unfortunately. It gets so many layers deep if you want the fully precise truth.
But the scripts vapid celebrities and their sycophant writers come up with? They sure as hell are. Any attempt to justify them longer than a couple of sentences only deserves distain and a "It ain't that deep bro'."
Ask them what percentage of black people make up the US population and you'll find out if they're living in reality or no.
I'd bet good money the people posting would startling rattling off the number of 30% or higher.
When they asked people how many unarmed black people they thought were gunned down by police in America every year, the numbers were staggering. 10k, 100k, and up. That year it was something like 7-13.
You’re statistically more likely to get stuck by lightning and die than to be a black unarmed citizen who gets shot and killed by police. Thats an actual fact
I can say the whole rigamarole shown in the clip isn't even a uniquely race thing.
I've seen plenty of my white trash friends and relatives go through similar "passive aggressive trying to get rid of you." Its a class thing, with the general assumption being that the poor and/or less sophisticated will bring trouble and aren't even worth associating with, but you can't outright tell them to leave without creating a scene. The problem of course being, every black person looks poor and/or like they will bring trouble so it is a much more common thing on their end.
I don't even blame the people for doing it, because most of the time they have good reason to do so and not a lot of reasons not to prevent the risk.
And the teller pointed them at a convicted armed robber in the middle of a drug deal. How can you argue that George Floyd was the victim of racial profiling without making it evidence that racial profiling works?
Nobody gets called out for being black, you DO get called out for being black and SUSPICIOUS though. You’d think this would make the black community act more carefully and culturally competent but instead they think everyone else is the problem and that they should embrace thug culture as a counter movement. Meanwhile any actual competent black people get called “uncle Toms” for wanting their race to not be seen as violent animals.
He knew who Floyd was insomuch as he knew he was the guy who just tried to pay with a counterfeit bill. That alone is perfectly valid grounds for calling the cops, you don't have to call it "profiling"?