In the few that DO include jews , jews has consistently been number 1 by a large margin. Why do they exclude that in most graphs/data about income by race?
I even saw a reddit page saying that the stereotype that jews are rich is wrong because the wikipedia article that had data about richest ethnic groups in America said it was indians . Never mind the fact that jews WERENT EVEN INCLUDED in that article . Because every time they actually are included they always come up on top by a large margin .
Why? why are they scared of people knowing that they are the richest? Its taboo to even say that "jews are rich" hmmm
The same reason that Hispanics, most of whom are clearly not the same race, are counted as white in the crime statistics. Because they have something to hide.
It's the same with every conspicuous modern omission. When you're talking about a global political mafia that has been in operation for a hundred years, there are no coincidences and there are no accidents.
Cue that boomer playing dumb "huh jews aren't whites now? I'm soooo confused"
They are called Schrödinger's Whiteman for a reason.
Shapeshifting lizard people.
They redefine race constantly when it benefits their argument. You often see this with Africans whether or not they are black is up to convenience.
Jews are the worst at this they will be just regular white people right up until they need to be a victim for some benefit.
The last few months have been wild. "We consider Israel to be a white colonial oppressor. We don't like white colonial oppressors." "Where is all of this anti-Semitism coming from?"
I was thinking this about Nigerians. Nigerians in Nigeria preside over what looks like to me a shitshow. Nigerians in America, I'm always told, are this educated group. Both can be true. People can be well educated and poorly behaved. I'm not an expert enough on Nigeria to promote some hypothesis about its problems. I just don't suppose that Nigerians are making here better.
America's problem is too many people with different expectations running around. From that perspective, "blacks" and Nigerians are very different groups.
Nigerians in America are the 'talented tenth' -- and often from the 'Igbo' tribe. They target education and do a generally fine job in the workforce (aided by affirmative action, of course). They are also impeccably behaved.
The average Nigerian... isn't like that.
I still see a lot of cultural issues, but I agree that they are well educated on average.
Act like Americans, I think they do not, but no they're probably not out in the street murdering each other. For the most part, you'll notice that immigrants from far, far overseas aren't. It is the more local immigrants that seem to be the biggest criminals. Perhaps due to self selection during the long journey, as you were hinting at.
I think the same thing about Chinese to an extent. All the really dull ones are still in China.
They're white when it benefits the narrative.
Last time a country figured out that jews were the richest people in the country it led to all their assets being seized to the benefit of the non-jews... and a big war with internment camps and stuff so I can see why they hide it.
This has absolutely nothing to do with the topic whatsoever and was just a thought that 100% randomly occurred to me. Do you think if leaches could hide themselves so you couldn't see that they were sucking your blood, would the leaches hide themselves or not? I think the parasites would hide themselves if they could.
There could be a number of reasons for that, many of which could be grouped together as "they don't want to be identified."
I think I found the wiki article Predditors would use (this one is per household, there is another page for per capita under See Also). The data apparently came from the US census and the "American Community Survey." As you mention, there's no subgroup breakdown for black or white ethnicities. There is a "detailed ancestry" section, but it discloses some problems with that data. Israel comes up 35th in that list.
interesting that they said "israeli" instead of just "jewish". The devil's in the detail. In graphs that specifically say "jewish" they always come up on top
https://files.catbox.moe/z5e6ii.jpeg
https://files.catbox.moe/0jmzgs.png
https://files.catbox.moe/zj6js2.png
Same reason they put white and jews in the same category for university admissions. Jews get overrepresented while white people get discriminated against even harder while also being underrepresented.
Even better they can also claim diversity points as minorities.
They are kings of have your cake and eat it. I admit that I'm slightly impressed.
Not any more.
You can take a population and slice it up however you want -- race, religion, or you can even use data instead of feedback. You're kind of asking why they don't advertise that they're the richest. I think history explains that. When it has been widely known, it has made the rabble angry and the nobility jealous, and that's dangerous for Jews. I don't even think Jews would deny that fair characterization. White people knowing anything about Jews is bad for Jews.
Post Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
This doesn't do that, but it gets very close with the 2nd to last sentence.