Black woman assaults 10 year old White girl
(archive.ph)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (35)
sorted by:
I don't like attributing racism when there is no concrete evidence for it. There are many lunatics in the world, and racism is not the only explanation for a random attack.
But even I can see that the attributions of the media go only one way, and the cover-ups only go one way.
Are you going to offer a better alternative? For many years blacks have been raised being taught that Whites are responsible for all the problems in their lives. Knowing that, is it not reasonable to assume that race was the motive?
While I do think the attack was motivated by racial hatred, the black community hates everyone, including their own unborn children.
Born ones, too. The men abandon them and the women scream and beat the shit out of them.
I do think race was probably the motive. But considering that I just criticized the media for framing every incident as indubitably racially motivated, it'd be pretty hypocritical if I did the same thing, not?
Benefit of the doubt is reserved for decent society and decent people.
Negros are not one and don't let us have the other, so they don't get to have it.
If there is 'doubt', then you admit that you don't know the motivation, but that you draw one conclusion because it suits you.
Did someone hack your account? This is a pretty sweeping statement I'm not accustomed to from you.
This is you giving the benefit of the doubt when there is a solid reason to assume that due to all the relevant factors such as the age and color difference that racism is a cause.
No one knows the motivation outright, and we likely will never get it told to us, but we have a history of these things happening enough to make an assumption that isn't entirely off base. Not to be certain but enough to be the most likely case given what information we have.
Because you have even less reason to prove that assumption wrong than anyone does to prove it right, other than "I don't like to." Its just weak contrarianism (as always).
And no, I'm still here and my positions haven't changed over the years either.
This is me not drawing a conclusion without having the evidence for it. Like I said to someone else, I do think it's likely, but I don't want to be like they are and definitively claim racism when it could be any number of things.
Not really. I could have said "it is inappropriate to".
You're just more open about it?