BRICs is mixed as the problem is it's in opposition to the US. That's not the bad thing, the issue is it involves 3 competing powers working together to do it.
That's the problem as I don't see Russia, China and India working together 100% to make it work, there's too much of a competing interest to do anything close to what the US has done.
Argentina pulling out might end up being for the best as being directed policy wise from another continent rarely ever works.
BRICS does work except it's more like (B)RIranC & friends. Brazil is constantly infiltrated by the west and India is way too close to the US (because they import oil from the US and Iraq), India is just an opportunistic neutral party more than anything. They really should change the name.
BRICS doesn't make sense for Argentina IMO because Argentina is too close to the USA and under the USA's sphere of influence. Russia and China won't upset the USA too much on account of Argentina. I think Argentina has more to lose than gain from joining the BRICS.
Argentina needs to cozy up with the USA BUT Milei needs to make sure he doesn't let in immigrants to Argentina for cheap labor or if he does, he only lets in White Immigrants while making sure he also ensures that foreign direct investment from the Americans doesn't lead to too much capital ownership in Argentina being attributed to foreigners instead of Argentinians. This balance can be done. Will he do it or will he succumb to pressure to sellout Argentina?
Lmao hes not going to prioritize white immigration yet also dollarize and cuck to the federal reserve and the United States of faggots and communists. that makes no sense.
Dude is piece meal selling off argentina to foreign buyers and bankers. His rabbi told him to.
Liberalism is closer to Anarcho-Capitalism than it is to Neo-Liberalism.
BRICs is probably a possible positive for neutral nations, but it's not really a good idea for a country int he American sphere of influence, especially when you've decided to defeat the fiat money printers by linking to the American currency.
For the most part, this just seems like it's a relatively good idea to stay within the American sphere of influence, and make it more likely that they won't assassinate you, since you are promising to pay back their loans and not damage the value of the petro-dollar.
I think the larger plan is to link up with Trump and get a major free trade deal going between the two countries. That would defiantly help recover the economy faster, and it could also make the exchange between the two markets very easy if the Argentinian Peso is interchangeable with USD. You could very easily get a cheap flight to Argentina, use US Currency to buy some things, and swing back.
The risk that I see is damage to the USD in the upcoming recession, but I get the feeling that the first problem we will see is deflationary in the beginning of the year, which won't hurt Argentina at all (they need deflationary pressures). The question is whether there will be a hyper-inflation response by the end of the year. At that point, he might have to break off and go the Ecuador route.
As for global warming, he might pull some "Oh I promise to cut emissions", and then do absolutely nothing, like everyone else.
A Socialist trying to undermine confidence in a Libertarian, color me surprised.
The Federal Reserve prints less money than the Argentine government, and putting the ability to print money outside of Argentina entirely is a better plan.
BRICs is mixed as the problem is it's in opposition to the US. That's not the bad thing, the issue is it involves 3 competing powers working together to do it.
That's the problem as I don't see Russia, China and India working together 100% to make it work, there's too much of a competing interest to do anything close to what the US has done.
Argentina pulling out might end up being for the best as being directed policy wise from another continent rarely ever works.
The only thing I can see them agreeing on is quietly taxing the crap out of the lesser members as soon as they get the chance.
BRICS does work except it's more like (B)RIranC & friends. Brazil is constantly infiltrated by the west and India is way too close to the US (because they import oil from the US and Iraq), India is just an opportunistic neutral party more than anything. They really should change the name.
BRICS doesn't make sense for Argentina IMO because Argentina is too close to the USA and under the USA's sphere of influence. Russia and China won't upset the USA too much on account of Argentina. I think Argentina has more to lose than gain from joining the BRICS.
Argentina needs to cozy up with the USA BUT Milei needs to make sure he doesn't let in immigrants to Argentina for cheap labor or if he does, he only lets in White Immigrants while making sure he also ensures that foreign direct investment from the Americans doesn't lead to too much capital ownership in Argentina being attributed to foreigners instead of Argentinians. This balance can be done. Will he do it or will he succumb to pressure to sellout Argentina?
We'll just have to wait and see.
Lmao hes not going to prioritize white immigration yet also dollarize and cuck to the federal reserve and the United States of faggots and communists. that makes no sense.
Dude is piece meal selling off argentina to foreign buyers and bankers. His rabbi told him to.
Immigration will be weird. Many Argentina consider themselves european. They go back and forth between Argentina and their ethnic home all the time.
The other problem is, Italians and Germans look a lot less Italian and German recently.
Not a good sign.
So he doesn't want to become a vassal state of China.
Neat.
Liberalism is closer to Anarcho-Capitalism than it is to Neo-Liberalism.
BRICs is probably a possible positive for neutral nations, but it's not really a good idea for a country int he American sphere of influence, especially when you've decided to defeat the fiat money printers by linking to the American currency.
For the most part, this just seems like it's a relatively good idea to stay within the American sphere of influence, and make it more likely that they won't assassinate you, since you are promising to pay back their loans and not damage the value of the petro-dollar.
I think the larger plan is to link up with Trump and get a major free trade deal going between the two countries. That would defiantly help recover the economy faster, and it could also make the exchange between the two markets very easy if the Argentinian Peso is interchangeable with USD. You could very easily get a cheap flight to Argentina, use US Currency to buy some things, and swing back.
The risk that I see is damage to the USD in the upcoming recession, but I get the feeling that the first problem we will see is deflationary in the beginning of the year, which won't hurt Argentina at all (they need deflationary pressures). The question is whether there will be a hyper-inflation response by the end of the year. At that point, he might have to break off and go the Ecuador route.
As for global warming, he might pull some "Oh I promise to cut emissions", and then do absolutely nothing, like everyone else.
Nobody will take a flight to Argentina for cheap stuff. That's stupid af. It's like 12 hours by plane from Miami.
Regardless he isn't getting off fiat money printing he's just outsourcing it to the federal reserve.
A Socialist trying to undermine confidence in a Libertarian, color me surprised.
The Federal Reserve prints less money than the Argentine government, and putting the ability to print money outside of Argentina entirely is a better plan.
Underrated comment. This is how politics works.
Everything about BRICS screams "EU but worse".
I thought BRICS was about basing their monetary systems on gold.
Milei chose to go with Bitcoin instead.
LOL...
https://archive.is/FpF6e