Liberalism is closer to Anarcho-Capitalism than it is to Neo-Liberalism.
BRICs is probably a possible positive for neutral nations, but it's not really a good idea for a country int he American sphere of influence, especially when you've decided to defeat the fiat money printers by linking to the American currency.
For the most part, this just seems like it's a relatively good idea to stay within the American sphere of influence, and make it more likely that they won't assassinate you, since you are promising to pay back their loans and not damage the value of the petro-dollar.
I think the larger plan is to link up with Trump and get a major free trade deal going between the two countries. That would defiantly help recover the economy faster, and it could also make the exchange between the two markets very easy if the Argentinian Peso is interchangeable with USD. You could very easily get a cheap flight to Argentina, use US Currency to buy some things, and swing back.
The risk that I see is damage to the USD in the upcoming recession, but I get the feeling that the first problem we will see is deflationary in the beginning of the year, which won't hurt Argentina at all (they need deflationary pressures). The question is whether there will be a hyper-inflation response by the end of the year. At that point, he might have to break off and go the Ecuador route.
As for global warming, he might pull some "Oh I promise to cut emissions", and then do absolutely nothing, like everyone else.
A Socialist trying to undermine confidence in a Libertarian, color me surprised.
The Federal Reserve prints less money than the Argentine government, and putting the ability to print money outside of Argentina entirely is a better plan.
Liberalism is closer to Anarcho-Capitalism than it is to Neo-Liberalism.
BRICs is probably a possible positive for neutral nations, but it's not really a good idea for a country int he American sphere of influence, especially when you've decided to defeat the fiat money printers by linking to the American currency.
For the most part, this just seems like it's a relatively good idea to stay within the American sphere of influence, and make it more likely that they won't assassinate you, since you are promising to pay back their loans and not damage the value of the petro-dollar.
I think the larger plan is to link up with Trump and get a major free trade deal going between the two countries. That would defiantly help recover the economy faster, and it could also make the exchange between the two markets very easy if the Argentinian Peso is interchangeable with USD. You could very easily get a cheap flight to Argentina, use US Currency to buy some things, and swing back.
The risk that I see is damage to the USD in the upcoming recession, but I get the feeling that the first problem we will see is deflationary in the beginning of the year, which won't hurt Argentina at all (they need deflationary pressures). The question is whether there will be a hyper-inflation response by the end of the year. At that point, he might have to break off and go the Ecuador route.
As for global warming, he might pull some "Oh I promise to cut emissions", and then do absolutely nothing, like everyone else.
Nobody will take a flight to Argentina for cheap stuff. That's stupid af. It's like 12 hours by plane from Miami.
Regardless he isn't getting off fiat money printing he's just outsourcing it to the federal reserve.
A Socialist trying to undermine confidence in a Libertarian, color me surprised.
The Federal Reserve prints less money than the Argentine government, and putting the ability to print money outside of Argentina entirely is a better plan.
Underrated comment. This is how politics works.