Y’all keep downvoting Imp every time he says something, and that post on Gaza houses got me thinking, because I’m genuinely curious. Currently, society is in situation where the majority of visible feminists are affluent white female liberals (AWFLs), but this is a question that needs answering in my opinion.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
There will be jews heavily involved in every liberal project. That doesn't mean it is a jewish conspiracy, it is just the natural outcome of existing for generations as a diaspora people. Liberalism is a replacement of the traditions and generational ties with "cosmopolitan modernism". Of course this would be better for a people who aren't the historical majority.
Some jews are militantly anti-Christian so they will intentionally support any anti-Christian movement.
No, it is a natural outcome for existing for generations as an inherently wicked kind.
Feminism itself is heavily based on so called critical theory, and we all know who invented that.
Chyna!
Depends on your definition of feminism: most likely a cavewoman, but wikipedia says Mary Wollstonecraft
The first woman, and her name was Eve.
Feminism in some form was always going to emerge from a liberal society. You can't build a society around "equality...but not for those people because reasons" and expect that to remain stable.
Some of the anti-feminists around places like this are only anti-feminists because they blame women for getting in the way of liberalism's false promises to deliver the freedom for them to live their lives as they choose, unshackled by any social expectations and with an unlimited marketplace of products to indulge them. They don't understand that liberalism is built on a lie. If it weren't feminism in your way, it would just be (and to a large extent, is) something else.
What are we even talking about when we talk about feminism then? Some are saying women's suffrage. Others are discussing later thinks like Critical Theory.
Korea had a feminist cult running the government, no?
It isn't only white women, or Jews, or Korean women. It's a mixture of all of them.
I think that was BS. The female president in question was the daughter of the late military strongman and a figure of the right. It had nothing to do with feminism, as far as I know.
However, your second paragraph is absolutely right. I'm not sure why people try to look for one group to hate for 'bad things'.
If we’re talking the 19th century suffragists it was all a conglomeration of female socialists. Jews were not prominent in the political sphere of influence like they were at the post WW2 era to today. Essentially it was a bunch of AWFLs back then too, affluent women who were pissed off they didn’t have all the same access and influence as men despite having none of the responsibilities as well. This was where the Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Susan B. Anthony, etc all came from affluence and lived comfortably on the excesses created by others. They were some of the original “career activists” because they never actually had to work for money or have to work to survive as many families did back then.
I’m talking about being the public face. There were no Kissingers in government at that time, no steinems pushing “equality”. Could they have had background influence? Possibly, but from what we know historically, the suffragists were predominantly affluent white women who didn’t have to work or home make so they became “activists and writers”
😂😂😂 explain the Maenads then?
I don't get the point you are trying to make.
Affluent women have been a cancer to every society in human history even before Jews existed, there’s numerous accounts in ancient writings of false rape claims, “Maenads/ feminists”, on and on. Jews didn’t create the behemoth, they simply exploited what was already there
I'm pretty sure men also did bad things, even like, a long time ago and stuff.
This is dumb.
Literally a lie.
Now that is interesting. You certainly know more than the historians of the era. Where did you learn that?
First wave feminism began in New Zealand. It was the first country to give women the vote.
What we would recognize as modern day feminism began with the WSPU, the radical terrorists who made a deal with the government to steal dead men's jobs in return for their backing of WW1.
When WW1 ended, they retained their jobs and got the vote, then they went and backed Oswald Mosley's British Fascist Union in the 30s. WSPU members pleaded for a ceasefire against the Nazis to the point that many of them were proscribed, alongside Mosley himself. A WSPU member was one of Hitler's closest confidants in Britain.
This is why I'm 100% sure that stormfags are feminists. They always have been, since the days of Florence Farr, who called for women's war against the Jews for "tarnishing women's image" - the exact same rhetoric used by Hitler when he spoke to the League of German Maidens. Hitler's first endorsement in Germany came from a women's group following Florence Farr, IIRC.
Did they also endorse Edward as King over his Brother? I know he abdicated over his wife (which repeated decades later, royals should never marry Americans) but zi know he had links to Nazis and they had plans to get him to be King again if they took control.
Correct, though Wallis Simpson looks like a saint compared to the creature preying on that vile oaf Harry.
That sounds like a fun thing to look up, I'll do it when I have time.
You Zionists also invoke the defilement of women narrative. That's OK though, because Jews.
The more important question is: does it matter?
Patterns matter to people who exercise pattern recognition when those patterns they recognise lead to bad things.
noooo we must judge every thing case by case!
What is the pattern?