When the gun debate got really big under Obama, the racial component of gun crime (and all crime) became glaringly obvious, even in normie right wing spaces. Blacks commit most violent crime, despite being a small percentage of the population. The one (laughable) counter argument the left and anti-racists tried to use against these statistics, is that most of the victims of black crime are other blacks.
Why is that? It's because, despite all the ridiculous multicultural propaganda in the West, people still predominantly prefer to live with their own kind. Even in "diverse" areas, people form ethnic enclaves. I've seen it myself, in numerous locations.
So, when crime happens, the most likely victims will be of the perpetrators own kind.
However, there's obviously bleed over and blending of the populations, leading to interracial crime stats, which skew overwhelmingly towards certain races.
Non-whites, with the exclusion of certain Asians, are more violent than White people, and White people are the predominant victim of interracial crime stats. Just because a violent non-white hurts one of their own in a "spree" doesn't discount the inherent anti-White biases in interracial crime.
Why is that? It's because, despite all the ridiculous multicultural propaganda in the West, people still predominantly prefer to live with their own kind.
Nope. People predominantly prefer to live in white spaces. That’s why homes cost the most in white neighborhoods. That’s why majority white schools are so popular. Black peoples, given the option, prefer to live in the safety and prosperity of white areas, not least because whites are overly altruistic and will give away resources if you call them racist.
Look at immigration as a whole. It’s mostly black and brown people moving to white countries. That doesn’t sound like “everyone prefers their own kind”.
This multiculturalism doesn’t work for white people. For those whose lives are improved by escaping dysfunctional black communities, multiculturalism is a net gain. It’s basically redistribution of prosperity via movement of peoples. It’s a form of communism.
The one exception is Muslims, who legitimately do prefer to live amongst their own. Their strategy is to take over white areas and change the fundamental character of the place to suit Islam.
Nope. People predominantly prefer to live in white spaces
Yes and no.
Non-whites love to live in White countries, and in White predominant areas, but when they move into them, they form their own ethnic enclaves. I've seen it dozens of times, across every racial line, in numerous locations. Don't believe me? Go deliver food or drive around a large city's suburb. The more non-whites sub groups the better. I've seen it among Indians, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Whites (that's why White flight exists), and it can be broken down into specific sub groups, too.
The few "integrated" and seemingly well adjusted non-whites are the higher functioning ones (the outliers on the bell curve), the ones that don't want to be next to their own kind. They're the trojan horse that convinces the local Whites that they're all like that, when they're not. If they were, their home countries wouldn't be shit holes. Over time, more and more non-whites immigrate to the area around the ethnic enclave, and slowly take it over, because White people flee to a Whiter area, and because we're having so few children, especially in suburban and city areas where most of this replacement migration has been occurring. It's also because a lot of non-white migration is being paid for and supported by blatantly anti-White NGOs and politicians.
After a certain amount of time, the once entirely White area is now almost completely devoid of White people, and the ethnic enclaves revert back to what their host countries look like, in every way.
That’s why homes cost the most in white neighborhoods.
It's partly because of White people fleeing to Whiter areas, and because of the higher functioning non-whites wanting to move there (that have the money to do so), and because housing/migrant/economic problems cause problems elsewhere. I live in an area where I can no longer afford a house (the same with most people my age), because of other states fucking up, pushing their people and businesses away, which causes their people to move here, in addition to the open borders and increasing migrant pressures, which has caused a massive balloon of both housing and rent prices.
Look at immigration as a whole. It’s mostly black and brown people moving to white countries. That doesn’t sound like “everyone prefers their own kind”.
This is only because it's massively inorganic, and has been from the beginning. If White people were allowed our own ethnic collective interests, we wouldn't be ruled over by blatantly anti-White leaders, in every institution in our own countries, and those leaders wouldn't be working with globalists and their NGOs to open our borders, and use our own tax money to fund their operations to literally bus, truck, train, and boat non-whites into our countries 24/7. If White people were allowed to espouse for our own ethnic interests, none of this would be happening. We'd have closed borders and keep our immigration White only.
The reason why non-whites want to come to White countries is because globalists have convinced them they can come, and because they know White countries afford them better opportunities. They're parasites and leeches. This is why a lot of the money "migrants" make is sent back to their families in their home countries, to the tune of tens of billions every year.
people still predominantly prefer to live with their own kind
All the proof you need is looking at a high school cafeteria. Look at who sits together. Sometimes it isn't along racial lines, but people ALWAYS sit with those like them, they never sit with people who are different than them.
Non-whites, with the exclusion of certain Asians, are more violent than White people, and White people are the predominant victim of interracial crime stats. Just because a violent non-white hurts one of their own in a "spree" doesn't discount the inherent anti-White biases in interracial crime.
Ok, but what about the counter of the fact that there's simply more White targets than non-White targets? It would make sense to see higher numbers of White victims on account of there simply being more White people overall.
That's exactly what interracial crime stats show in every single White majority country. White people are the predominant victim in interracial crime stats.
Not necessarily.
When the gun debate got really big under Obama, the racial component of gun crime (and all crime) became glaringly obvious, even in normie right wing spaces. Blacks commit most violent crime, despite being a small percentage of the population. The one (laughable) counter argument the left and anti-racists tried to use against these statistics, is that most of the victims of black crime are other blacks.
Why is that? It's because, despite all the ridiculous multicultural propaganda in the West, people still predominantly prefer to live with their own kind. Even in "diverse" areas, people form ethnic enclaves. I've seen it myself, in numerous locations. So, when crime happens, the most likely victims will be of the perpetrators own kind.
However, there's obviously bleed over and blending of the populations, leading to interracial crime stats, which skew overwhelmingly towards certain races.
Non-whites, with the exclusion of certain Asians, are more violent than White people, and White people are the predominant victim of interracial crime stats. Just because a violent non-white hurts one of their own in a "spree" doesn't discount the inherent anti-White biases in interracial crime.
Nope. People predominantly prefer to live in white spaces. That’s why homes cost the most in white neighborhoods. That’s why majority white schools are so popular. Black peoples, given the option, prefer to live in the safety and prosperity of white areas, not least because whites are overly altruistic and will give away resources if you call them racist.
Look at immigration as a whole. It’s mostly black and brown people moving to white countries. That doesn’t sound like “everyone prefers their own kind”.
This multiculturalism doesn’t work for white people. For those whose lives are improved by escaping dysfunctional black communities, multiculturalism is a net gain. It’s basically redistribution of prosperity via movement of peoples. It’s a form of communism.
The one exception is Muslims, who legitimately do prefer to live amongst their own. Their strategy is to take over white areas and change the fundamental character of the place to suit Islam.
Yes and no.
Non-whites love to live in White countries, and in White predominant areas, but when they move into them, they form their own ethnic enclaves. I've seen it dozens of times, across every racial line, in numerous locations. Don't believe me? Go deliver food or drive around a large city's suburb. The more non-whites sub groups the better. I've seen it among Indians, blacks, Hispanics, Asians, Whites (that's why White flight exists), and it can be broken down into specific sub groups, too.
The few "integrated" and seemingly well adjusted non-whites are the higher functioning ones (the outliers on the bell curve), the ones that don't want to be next to their own kind. They're the trojan horse that convinces the local Whites that they're all like that, when they're not. If they were, their home countries wouldn't be shit holes. Over time, more and more non-whites immigrate to the area around the ethnic enclave, and slowly take it over, because White people flee to a Whiter area, and because we're having so few children, especially in suburban and city areas where most of this replacement migration has been occurring. It's also because a lot of non-white migration is being paid for and supported by blatantly anti-White NGOs and politicians.
After a certain amount of time, the once entirely White area is now almost completely devoid of White people, and the ethnic enclaves revert back to what their host countries look like, in every way.
It's partly because of White people fleeing to Whiter areas, and because of the higher functioning non-whites wanting to move there (that have the money to do so), and because housing/migrant/economic problems cause problems elsewhere. I live in an area where I can no longer afford a house (the same with most people my age), because of other states fucking up, pushing their people and businesses away, which causes their people to move here, in addition to the open borders and increasing migrant pressures, which has caused a massive balloon of both housing and rent prices.
This is only because it's massively inorganic, and has been from the beginning. If White people were allowed our own ethnic collective interests, we wouldn't be ruled over by blatantly anti-White leaders, in every institution in our own countries, and those leaders wouldn't be working with globalists and their NGOs to open our borders, and use our own tax money to fund their operations to literally bus, truck, train, and boat non-whites into our countries 24/7. If White people were allowed to espouse for our own ethnic interests, none of this would be happening. We'd have closed borders and keep our immigration White only.
The reason why non-whites want to come to White countries is because globalists have convinced them they can come, and because they know White countries afford them better opportunities. They're parasites and leeches. This is why a lot of the money "migrants" make is sent back to their families in their home countries, to the tune of tens of billions every year.
On the rest, I agree with your sentiments.
All the proof you need is looking at a high school cafeteria. Look at who sits together. Sometimes it isn't along racial lines, but people ALWAYS sit with those like them, they never sit with people who are different than them.
Or prisons, where there's more danger involved, which pushes people towards natural inclinations.
Ok, but what about the counter of the fact that there's simply more White targets than non-White targets? It would make sense to see higher numbers of White victims on account of there simply being more White people overall.
That's exactly what interracial crime stats show in every single White majority country. White people are the predominant victim in interracial crime stats.