Non-whites, with the exclusion of certain Asians, are more violent than White people, and White people are the predominant victim of interracial crime stats. Just because a violent non-white hurts one of their own in a "spree" doesn't discount the inherent anti-White biases in interracial crime.
Ok, but what about the counter of the fact that there's simply more White targets than non-White targets? It would make sense to see higher numbers of White victims on account of there simply being more White people overall.
That's exactly what interracial crime stats show in every single White majority country. White people are the predominant victim in interracial crime stats.
Ok, but what about the counter of the fact that there's simply more White targets than non-White targets? It would make sense to see higher numbers of White victims on account of there simply being more White people overall.
That's exactly what interracial crime stats show in every single White majority country. White people are the predominant victim in interracial crime stats.