There’s going to be some epic whining over this one. The whole marginalized or oppression thing has always been frustrating when dealing with trannies or their allies. “We need to protect trans rights” and I’d ask “which rights need protecting?” They can vote (as long as they remember to update the registration), own property, be religious (or not), get married, etc. Then I get “they’re excluded from using the restrooms they want!” I didn’t know that was a right, but that’s the main one I’ve gotten in response. If that’s their biggest concern then they’re doing pretty well.
Wow! I wish we could remove the term “marginalized” from the English language. On the bright side it does show you who the morons are. A guy on FB used it when responding to me saying I wouldn’t hire someone with pronouns on the resume
So the argument was that 'troons' are 'marginalized'. If that were true, why would you draw attention to that fact on your resume? They're "marginalized" like American Indians are marginalized by universities and like Waffen SS members are "marginalized" by the Canadian parliament.
The media, politicians, academia and most courts obey their every whim. Very marginalized.
Also, I find the court's argument to be rather bizarre. It assumes that if troons do not have power, it follows that the 'democratic process is broken'. Or maybe it just works as it was intended, and people rightly reject such perversions of human nature. However, I am pleased that the fact that their recruitment of politicians like Biden backfired and was in fact cited by the court to not give them the special status that they so crave.
It's double bad because they should be marginalized.
The only time mental illness shouldn't be marginalized is when the person doesn't have choice over their actions because their brain isn't working right.
Well yea, if you have a whole month where the state and mega corporations celebrate you, the media fetishises you all year round and people who criticize you risk getting canceled, you are not marginalized. You are in fact MASSIVELY overrepresented and overprivileged.
the sixth circuit's ruling tonight (banning child castration in Tennessee) takes a blowtorch to claims that 'the healthcare industry' and quack activists like WPATH should ever overrule democratically elected laws .. decision notes WPATH changes its mind constantly
Let's not forget that WPATH included in its latest standards a chapter on the 'eunuch' so called gender identity, of men who want all sex organs removed and not even replaced with a rot pocket. The writers of this chapter were heavily involved with a website for castration fetishists, who spread around videos of castration (especially of minors), because the users found this sexually arousing. One also had written a Washington Post piece calling on ISIS to not behead, but castrate its captives and use them as eunuchs - because all successful Islamic empires used eunuchs.
I know this sounds so crazy that I must be making it up. I wish that were the case.
One also had written a Washington Post piece calling on ISIS to not behead, but castrate its captives and use them as eunuchs - because all successful Islamic empires used eunuchs.
Hmm, so not a lawyer and definitely not knowledgeable about every part of the US judicial system, but if they want to appeal this is the only place they can go is the US supreme Court now, which I wouldn't be surprised Thomas is smiling of he gets this case?
Don't know, from the track record, anything election related yeah they won't touch with a 10 foot pole
But everything else? They've been hitting back at abortion, grabbing guns, forcing someone to produce labour that goes against their religious convictions. So since this isn't election related, good chance this'll be a huge set back for the demon worshippers if they get this case.
There’s going to be some epic whining over this one. The whole marginalized or oppression thing has always been frustrating when dealing with trannies or their allies. “We need to protect trans rights” and I’d ask “which rights need protecting?” They can vote (as long as they remember to update the registration), own property, be religious (or not), get married, etc. Then I get “they’re excluded from using the restrooms they want!” I didn’t know that was a right, but that’s the main one I’ve gotten in response. If that’s their biggest concern then they’re doing pretty well.
Right to access your children
Wow! I wish we could remove the term “marginalized” from the English language. On the bright side it does show you who the morons are. A guy on FB used it when responding to me saying I wouldn’t hire someone with pronouns on the resume
So the argument was that 'troons' are 'marginalized'. If that were true, why would you draw attention to that fact on your resume? They're "marginalized" like American Indians are marginalized by universities and like Waffen SS members are "marginalized" by the Canadian parliament.
Also how is it marginalizing anyone when the media carries your water and me saying “I don’t believe men are women” is seen as genocide
If they exaggerate shamelessly enough and shriek hysterically enough, some people might just stop thinking and do as they're told!
They are marginal, not marginalized.
You should inform them of that.
The media, politicians, academia and most courts obey their every whim. Very marginalized.
Also, I find the court's argument to be rather bizarre. It assumes that if troons do not have power, it follows that the 'democratic process is broken'. Or maybe it just works as it was intended, and people rightly reject such perversions of human nature. However, I am pleased that the fact that their recruitment of politicians like Biden backfired and was in fact cited by the court to not give them the special status that they so crave.
And large parts of the general public. Local, regional, and national levels of government. Multinational NGOs.
Totally marginalised! 🙄
It's double bad because they should be marginalized.
The only time mental illness shouldn't be marginalized is when the person doesn't have choice over their actions because their brain isn't working right.
Well yea, if you have a whole month where the state and mega corporations celebrate you, the media fetishises you all year round and people who criticize you risk getting canceled, you are not marginalized. You are in fact MASSIVELY overrepresented and overprivileged.
"Three" months and change at this point.
https://i.imgur.com/TyRzoML.jpg
https://twitter.com/gregg_re/status/1707580886705692775
Let's not forget that WPATH included in its latest standards a chapter on the 'eunuch' so called gender identity, of men who want all sex organs removed and not even replaced with a rot pocket. The writers of this chapter were heavily involved with a website for castration fetishists, who spread around videos of castration (especially of minors), because the users found this sexually arousing. One also had written a Washington Post piece calling on ISIS to not behead, but castrate its captives and use them as eunuchs - because all successful Islamic empires used eunuchs.
I know this sounds so crazy that I must be making it up. I wish that were the case.
Fair enough, it's true. The middle east doesn't have a massive population descended from slaves that cause problems today.
Whaaaaat? That actually surprised me
Hmm, so not a lawyer and definitely not knowledgeable about every part of the US judicial system, but if they want to appeal this is the only place they can go is the US supreme Court now, which I wouldn't be surprised Thomas is smiling of he gets this case?
Yes, the next level up that an appeal goes to is SCOTUS. Here's an okay map of the federal court system:
https://th.bing.com/th/id/R.cf8cad81a7a090aa9b859ec44a62a907?rik=FfH%2bgg5lXobP%2fg&riu=http%3a%2f%2fcaseystewartgov.weebly.com%2fuploads%2f5%2f8%2f8%2f9%2f58899623%2f8711819_orig.gif&ehk=laxrEwc0Kgv5IWVMwHJgrDbRrc2SEioPfugibnikC1o%3d&risl=&pid=ImgRaw&r=0
I'm pretty sure it can go 'en banc' first, meaning a review by the whole Circuit.
Thank you, let's just save that if I need to refer to it again.
This is correct. Even the "conservative" cucks like Roberts and Kavanaugh won't stand for child mutilation.
Famous last words.
Don't know, from the track record, anything election related yeah they won't touch with a 10 foot pole
But everything else? They've been hitting back at abortion, grabbing guns, forcing someone to produce labour that goes against their religious convictions. So since this isn't election related, good chance this'll be a huge set back for the demon worshippers if they get this case.
Roberts and Gorsuch voted to give extend Civil Rights Act of 1964 protections to the gender confused, a category that did not even exist at the time.
The only truly politically powerless group I can even think of would be felons.