Lefty view of the Bible
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (29)
sorted by:
You mean like outlawing usury right? Or is that anti semitic?
With magic. No Christian is expected to feed thousands with two loaves of bread. The impossible stupidity of liberals aside, Christ preached personal charity and despised hypocrites, so the kind of people who demand that others be heavily taxed and then call themselves righteous would be the first people he casts into the fire.
Tell me you've never read the Bible without telling me you never read it. Because that's not what happened.
The Good Samaritan put up the travelers in a hotel, not his own damn house. He would have been a failure as head of household had he done so, because exposing your own to unnecessary risk is a sin.
And just in case you were talking about Mary and Joseph during their travels... they weren't so called refugees. They were traveling to register for a census for taxation. Yet another condemnation of taxists.
I'm summary, liberals don't know the first fuckin thing about Christianity, and every time they open their filthy mouths they only spew more heresy and damn themselves further.
As someone who hasn't read his bible in close to 20 years, what's the theological origin of this? Because it sounds like an excellent principle to encourage and is applicable to a large number of issues we're facing today.
The near constant allegory to shepherds, in numerous verses.
Woe unto the worthless shepherd who deserts his flock.
Jesus in the secular sense was a rhetorical masterpiece, and it's not a mistake that he called on his followers to be shepherds of men.
Disregard modernity. Think back to two thousand years ago. What did it mean to be a shepherd?
You protected your flock. Your livelihood. You lived and died by the resources under your command, your responsibility. You fought against and actively looked out for predators. You guarded said livelihood against thieves and potential murderers.
This was not a job for weak, cowardly men. The word 'passive' did not enter into your vocabulary, and you were anything but harmless. Gentle, maybe. But not harmless.
I admit a little bit of frustration that it's never taught that way, though. Certainly not when I was growing up.
Hardiness and will to violence were never really presented in any part of what I was taught back in my youth. It's a problem with society more generally too, but there's this notion that violence is universally malicious and protecting your interests makes you a bad person.
The Shepard archetype is a warrior as well. He fights the lion, the bear, the wolf. He lays his life on the line for the sheep, and in the case of the perfect Shepard dies to protect them eternally.
David as the Shepard King's first act is to slaughter the threat to his family by beheading.
The Good Shepard for his part, forgave and welcomed all with the caveat to "sin no more" and he STILL enacted violence when it came to protecting the purity of worship.
It's one of those things. There's a level of unaffected, zen, monk type attitude in Christianity, but it is backed up strongly with "hate that which is evil"
Hate is a strong word. And "to hate" is commanded by God.
I mean, it goes even beyond that. The modern "hippie Jesus" meme is an utter heresy. Christianity of the first three centuries was an utterly feared faith (Acts 17:6). One of the few peopl to be praised by Jesus was a centurion (Matthew 8:5-13). The first Gentile Christian was a centurion (Acts 10).
I agree with your point but just to clarify, hospitality to travelers (even in your house) was almost a sacred norm in those days and still lingers in the Middle East. The Good Samaritan was also a traveler, so that's why he used a hotel. However, these norms made sense because anyone taking advantage of that hospitality or breaching the norms would also be dealt with very seriously. You could also turn people out with due cause like Abraham kicked out Hagar and Ishmael.
Also the person at risk would usually be the traveler, not the host.
See Abraham and Lot receiving divine visitors, the widow of Zarephath receiving Elisha, people receiving Jesus and his disciples, people receiving apostles, the witch of Endor's treatment of Saul, and on the flipside the poor conduct of the Sodomites and the gang rape of the traveler's concubine in Judges.