Japan's TV has exploded with discussions on illegal aliens, foreigners and refugees this past year.
The Japanese immigration control law is currently in process of revision so that foreigners applying for refugee status CAN be deported, and that foreigners must pass refugee status twice to be accepted as a refugee and will be deported if they fail to do so.
The interesting part about why the law is in revision is because of Kurds. Japan for the most part does not recognize the Kurds as refugees. The only city that does is the city of Kawaguchi, and outside the city, they are illegal aliens. In Japan, the people who identify as Kurdish are recorded as Turks with Turkish citizenship, thus not a refugee.
Japan does not have a big Kurdish population, but they tend to be on news disproportionately for illegal activity such as murder, attempted murder, rape, sexual assault, reckless driving, street fights and clashing with police while reported as "done by Turks." In the past, similar incidents happened with Iranians and Japan answered with revising visa standards for Iranian "tourists." (i.e. illegal aliens living in Japan for years) As for Kurds, they shout they deserve human rights while infringing on other peoples' rights while on official record count as crime done by Turks.
Japan has had enough, the mayor of Kawaguchi has had enough, the chairman of the Liberal Democratic Party has had enough, and legal Turks who didn't cause no trouble has had enough. Japan is changing immigration law with support of voters, mayor of Kawaguchi is directly telling the Ministry of Justice to deport criminal foreigners, and the chairman of the majority party is directly talking to the Turkish ambassador that Japan might have to take away Turkish visa exceptions just like what happened with Iranians. Turks living in Japan who doesn't even support Erdogan are telling Kurdish criminals to leave the country and go back to Turkey, knowing Erdogan acts with an iron fist against Kurdish guerillas and terrorists.
Ideals and compassion sounds nice, but that cannot come from the suffering of citizens. Japan has a much bigger foreign population of Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, Filipino and other SEA nations that abide by the law. It doesn't matter who you are, if you cause trouble, Japan will answer firmly in interest with law abiding citizens, as any nation should.
there is no version of events where the first safe country you get to from turkey is japan
Yeah a real "refugee" is going to go a few countries over. Not across the world. The whole concept of refugees is just to get them to invade stable societies to ruin them.
I don't understand why refugees would want to go so far.
For example, we've got a ton of Eritreans in Canada. They just got done with a 20 year war of succession against Ethiopia.
So they come here and brawl in the streets..?
If you hate your government, go to Ethiopia and fight from there. If you hate Ethiopia, stay in Eritrea and do your military service.
Why the hell would you go halfway around the world just to fly your old flag?
The same reason anyone flies their flag over new land and that's to show that they've conquered it.
I don't see how asylum can be maintained if it simply means there are no borders any more.
It can't. Britain has already had at least one case where it said it couldn't offer sanctuary to a Pakistani Christian because of all the Pakistani Muslims they've already let in.
Some pol was in I think salon last night ( I read weird stuff), and they said he was an Indian Muslim. I said: isn't that called a Pakistani? Like what else is the difference between the poos and the Pakis?
Good, nice to set the example on this, though not having them in the first place would've been better, this is a close second.
foreigners are a problem regardless if they abide by the law or not , there will always be a conflict in loyalties There was a uyghur that got a position of political power in Japan and i saw some Japanese comments who werent happy about that, and they rightfully pointed out that "foreigners will never forget their ancestral homeland. "
Even if foreigners "prove themselves to fit in" what about their children? or their grandchildren? there's plenty of foreigners that were ok in the first generation but by the 2nd generation or 3rd generation their children and grandchildren start causing trouble cause they rightfully know they dont belong.
Strong monoculture + low % of foreigners = preservation of culture
If immigration is kept low, children and grandchildren will eventually be diluted and absorbed into the monoculture.
We actually have several historical examples of this working well, ironically with the opposite case: large foreign ethnic populations that have displaced native minorities. Americans successfully dissolved and absorbed the native culture, Japanese successfully absorbed and supplanted the Ainu culture.
To answer the natural objection, "but what about the Native Americans that still hate white people on their reservations," anyone can clearly see the native culture, while extant to this day, is waning even faster than the decadent white culture, and at no point during America's history did it ever pose an existential threat. The fact that you can claim native status with as little as 1/16th blood shows you how absorption into the majority works.
Immigration shouldnt be "kept low" immigration should be kept non existent. the only time it was possible to absorb the minority in to the majority was when the immigration was non existent and the culture is highly nationalist with absolutely zero globalist elements at all .
The gypsies and the jews were minorities in Europe for thousands of years and look what happened. They didn't assimilate at all.
Immigration should be restricted to peer cultures you don't have to destroy for your own safety. That's what's wrong with having gypsies around - not that they're a minority culture, but that they're a hostile culture.
Indeed. It's why America did fine when the people immigrating were Europeans and why things have gone to shit since that changed.
Not to go all Jew on you, but zero immigration is a fiction on the level of libertarianism and the non-aggression principle. Simply put it has never existed among cultures that are aware of each other. The culture with the upper hand will always take advantage of the lesser, and the lesser will seek opportunities in the former. Successful cultures have controlled immigration to their benefit.
I guess you haven't heard of Japan's Sakoku period where they didnt allow any immigrants and didnt allow anyone to leave either? they didnt even allow Japanese that had left the Japan to ever come back to Japan.
I'll give you that, but it ended with a guy from another ethnocentric country kicking the door down. (Why was he able to do that? Because he came from a less isolationist culture.) Trade and movement is the natural state of man.
if you honestly think zero immigration is fiction then you have already been brainwashed by globalist propaganda to accept immigration as the norm.
That's a nice ideological statement, but it's not truthful. Got to face reality.
You have to ask why, at least.
why does any country allow a foreigner to have political power? even dual citizens are too sus for my liking.
I was listening to Peterson speak on compassion today and he makes a good point.
People who are overly compassionate and, by extension, agreeable, enable sociopaths by refusing to say no to them.
Compassion can definitely be pathological.
Dont chinese and korean gangs also cause a fair bit of trouble in japan as well
Not for average citizens. Maybe an increase in general drugs and weapon availability.
That's like preferring ms13 to the average nigger
Wikipedia says only 2000. I'd think that's a small enough growth and total for the more respectable Kurds to self police and not ire the nationalistic host country.
its only 2000 yet they have already caused so much problems i've even heard that there's a no go zone in Japan that Japanese people cant go to and that is purely because of the kurds there .
I don't know why the US picked the Kurds as their butt buddies. They're smelly, crazy, violent people like everyone over there.
Because they are a significant minority in Turkey, Syria, Iran and Iraq.
They are great at destabilising those countries.
communists
Can i get a source for this?
Refugees are guests and should act like it.
Maybe he's from the broader "Somaliland". Somalia is not the only country that contains those shit eaters, unfortunately.
Internet scuttlebutt says his dad is Ethiopian, his mom is Somalian.