Which calls into question women's "achievements" in education - which calls into the question the impartiality of teachers...yeah I can see why feminists on either side didn't touch this one.
To be fair a teacher's IQ doesn't have any effect on student achievement as long it's above a surprisingly low minimum. The bigger problem is that women are more likely to subject kids to DIE shit and groom them into transgenderism. Not to mention the lack of male role models for boys.
Which is why we'd be better off with AI teachers at this point. What does a teacher even do? Create a lesson plan, describe the topic with examples, and answer student's questions. LLMs have proven more than capable of the latter two, and most lesson plans today are based off textbook templates and a mandated curriculum. The AI won't molest the students either.
Of course today's "AI" is a prime vector of cultural subversion so I'm not suggesting we unleash closed-source ChatGPT into our classrooms. Nor would I claim it's better than an actual highly skilled human teacher, but those are few and far between.
What makes you say that? Bear in mind the likes of Andrew Tate have been interviewed cordially by normiecon figures like Tucker Carlson, not so for major White Nationalists or other JQ believers.
The kosher right actively traffics in all sorts of negative stereotypes about White women in particular ("Karens," "AWLFS," etc.).
Tate and the rest of the "red pills" aren't taking on the WQ. They never address WHY the women behave the way they do, or at least not in a socially unacceptable way. Instead they try to shatter men's illusions about women, which is good.
Their fundamental principle that the "good life" for a man is lots of sex is still placing women's judgment of men as the highest value.
Women have no power, with the possible exception of cold demonic reptilian ones like hillary clinton.
When they have the appearance of power there are always puppetmasters behind them pushing an agenda. Because, despite the clamor about "equality", women are still always shielded from the harshest criticism and treated like fragile flowers no matter how retarded they are, doubly so if they are slightly attractive.
Yes and no, men are better represented at the extremes on the IQ spectrum, so among the extremely intelligent and the extremely unintelligent there are more men and I think women have a slightly higher average general intelligence overall. But still the spatial intelligence required for chess is probably generally higher in men.
Apparently that study was done right around puberty, which girls tend to hit sooner than boys. In other words the girls were essentially given a head start compared to any other point in their lives when this study was conducted. I think there's some truth to the claim that the standard deviation is lower for women, but claims about the means being equal are certainly suspect.
They're tacitly admitting that biological reality doesn't change just because a tranny says so and that females aren't a threat to the world record even if they pretend to be men.
The funny part is that there's no reason to segregate chess by sex unless you accept the premise that men are biologically smarter than women.
Which calls into question women's "achievements" in education - which calls into the question the impartiality of teachers...yeah I can see why feminists on either side didn't touch this one.
To be fair a teacher's IQ doesn't have any effect on student achievement as long it's above a surprisingly low minimum. The bigger problem is that women are more likely to subject kids to DIE shit and groom them into transgenderism. Not to mention the lack of male role models for boys.
Which is why we'd be better off with AI teachers at this point. What does a teacher even do? Create a lesson plan, describe the topic with examples, and answer student's questions. LLMs have proven more than capable of the latter two, and most lesson plans today are based off textbook templates and a mandated curriculum. The AI won't molest the students either.
Of course today's "AI" is a prime vector of cultural subversion so I'm not suggesting we unleash closed-source ChatGPT into our classrooms. Nor would I claim it's better than an actual highly skilled human teacher, but those are few and far between.
The WQ is an even stronger social taboo than the JQ.
What makes you say that? Bear in mind the likes of Andrew Tate have been interviewed cordially by normiecon figures like Tucker Carlson, not so for major White Nationalists or other JQ believers.
The kosher right actively traffics in all sorts of negative stereotypes about White women in particular ("Karens," "AWLFS," etc.).
Tate and the rest of the "red pills" aren't taking on the WQ. They never address WHY the women behave the way they do, or at least not in a socially unacceptable way. Instead they try to shatter men's illusions about women, which is good.
Their fundamental principle that the "good life" for a man is lots of sex is still placing women's judgment of men as the highest value.
TRP people most definitely did insist they had women figured out. They talked lots of armchair evo psych stuff about hypergamy and the like.
Women's entire power structure is built on such shaky foundations.
They cheated at every level from education to recruitment to promotions, and if any of that cheating is discovered, it all comes crashing down.
Women have no power, with the possible exception of cold demonic reptilian ones like hillary clinton.
When they have the appearance of power there are always puppetmasters behind them pushing an agenda. Because, despite the clamor about "equality", women are still always shielded from the harshest criticism and treated like fragile flowers no matter how retarded they are, doubly so if they are slightly attractive.
They absolutely have power. The pussy trap is very real, and it is the reason men gave them everything to their own detriment.
That they rent it out for $5 now is a good thing, because that power needs to be diluted and broken.
Yes and no, men are better represented at the extremes on the IQ spectrum, so among the extremely intelligent and the extremely unintelligent there are more men and I think women have a slightly higher average general intelligence overall. But still the spatial intelligence required for chess is probably generally higher in men.
I thought women were smarter than men?!
Even the whole "flatter bell curve" thing is such cope.
Apparently that study was done right around puberty, which girls tend to hit sooner than boys. In other words the girls were essentially given a head start compared to any other point in their lives when this study was conducted. I think there's some truth to the claim that the standard deviation is lower for women, but claims about the means being equal are certainly suspect.
...They game a lot of these tests to make it look like chicks are 'smart'.
The reality is that chicks are great at doing what they're told, so they make fantastic classical musicians.
They suck at creativity, which is why there are (almost) no chick rock guitarists.
Based
They're tacitly admitting that biological reality doesn't change just because a tranny says so and that females aren't a threat to the world record even if they pretend to be men.
Slightly related - to this day the only female top contender in SC2 has been Scarlett, who is trans. Unless I missed another tranny.
Trans so not a female
Good!
Now they should nerf the queen abilities, that thing is OP af
global filter blocked this: Did Glenn Greenwald find this on Wikileaks because of his journalistic credentials?
wikileaks
wiki leaks
global filter blocked this: Did Glenn Gwald find this on Wikiliaks because of his journalistic credentials?
global filter blocked this: Did Glenn Greenwald find this on Wikiliaks because of his journalistic credentials?
The superior grip strength makes men better at moving the pieces faster.