Summary and some discussion here: https://www.nextbigfuture.com/2023/08/myocarditis-heart-damage-in-1-out-of-35-covid-vaccinations.html :
"A new study of 777 people found that 22 had markers that indicated the mRNA-1273 covid vaccine caused myocardial injury in 1 out of 35 people. This is about thousand times more than prior estimates of myocardial injury. It would mean if 1.8 billion people in the world had covid vaccinations and boosters then 50 million would have had myocardial injury. This would usually be mild and transitory but if those people had strenuous exercise during this period they could trigger heart attacks. This would mean if 280 million people in the USA had covid vaccinations and boosters then you would expect about 8 million to have experienced myocardial injury from the vaccination."
Here is the source study: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ejhf.2978
Dr. John Campbell discusses the new study: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd_RTf_ForA&t=80s
I am not an expert but this study looks pretty legit to me: peer reviewed, relatively large cohort (777 people), respectable source and so forth.
If the risks revealed therein are in fact indicative of the population risks of these vaccines this is enormous news and a real "smoking gun" moment.
Edit: Here's a video of Dr. Vinay Prasad giving a very good explanation of the study (thanks to @fauxgnaws): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vveMHtVk_mY
It's horrific, and far worse than anything anyone expected. Even for an experimental injection, the rate is madness.
We need a Nuremburg Trial.
Unbelievably, the most ethical thing that Pfizer ever did, was push out batches that may have been just saline solution to as a control comparison to what they were previously distributing.
The Nuremberg trial would be run by the government and elite, which were totally on board with the vax in the first place.
That depends very much on which government, and which people in it.
Politicians have houses.
Yep, myocarditis incidence at nearly 3% is truly appalling -- over 1000 TIMES worse than we've been led to believe and what is even now being promulgated, eg: https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/covid-19-vaccines-myocarditis
Occurrence of a life threatening side effect (which also has negative long term risks) at that rate pretty much explodes the risk/reward math for the covid jab for healthy and especially for young people.
Given who's in power, if Nurenberg trials are held over this, it will be to jail the people opposing mandatory vaccination. Our public health institutions are throughoutly captured and the staff either corrupt, brainwashed, or both.
We had an inquiry here in Québec over the mass death in Long Term Care facilities because thousands of patients were left to die of thirst and hunger in their shit and filed as ''covid deaths''.
The inquiry, which concluded similarily as the one in the UK, basically doubled-down on insanity and said we should have locked-down and masked harder.
Both lockdowns and masks failed to show statistically-significant benefits, but plenty of statistically-significant harms.
It's the lockdowns that made it possible for thousands of people to die as their relatives were banned from visiting to care for them and witness the atrocity.
If Pfizer acting ethically sounds too good to be true it probably is.
This claim about batches with zero side effects so must be saline was fake news; the batches were just resent elsewhere (AU) and recorded as zeros in Denmark or wherever it was.
But the actual data for those batches showed 1 in 6000 deaths/disability per dose, and some people have had like 5 doses/boosters of this shit by now.
I wonder if this was less about "placebo batches" than it was about the vaxx doses breaking down due to being improperly stored.
And how many nurses were making sure to keep the jabs properly cooled up until nearly the moment of injection, rather than leaving a bunch on the counter to save time?
I just don't know if this would render the jabs inert, or make them more dangerous.
9/10 normies simply will not believe it unless the NYT and WaPo confirm it, which will never happen.
I'm sure at least half of them have doubts but they keep those doubts to themselves.
The fact that this is a high quality and peer reviewed study from a respected source will make it harder for the mainstream media to ignore. They probably still will, but I think there is at least a slim chance this gets some coverage.
I expect no coverage at all, no mention at all, like with all other credible evidence that goes against their narrative. They will only address it if voices become overwhelmingly loud despite them never saying a word about it, and when they do, they'll just deflect blame.
They will never acknowledge that they were the ones pushing for lockdowns, for barring entry to businesses to any non-compliant person, to barring travel, to having police enforcing curfews and dispersal of gatherings, to forcing their citizen to go against basic human rights about body autonomy, that they bombarded us with false propaganda for years while censoring all evidence of their lies, that they caused irrepairable harm to the mental development of our children and delayed their learning by years.They will always blame others, or argue that those were policies supported by everyone, and they won't be entirely wrong.
This event has shown that the majority of the population is utterly brainwashed, incapable of thinking for themselves, and unwilling to criticize or question people in positions of authority, even when they make questionable claims. I have loss a lot of faith I once had in society.
Well, it appears to have been published a month ago and not a peep in the mainstream, so yeah.
As predictable as it is disappointing.
You are of course right, MSM will try to ignore this as hard as they can. From what I understand the paper is accepted and peer reviewed by the well respected European Journal of Heart Failure but has not yet been published (2:20 in the Campbell video). It may well get a bump in visibility when it's officially published.
They'll admit it ... in about 50 years when nobody cares.
Normies are beginning to acknowledge the highly increased rate of myocarditis, but the media and government have convinced them that covid is causing all of these heart injuries. And because everyone who got vaxxed contracted covid anyways - and because normies are so desperate to believe the vax wasn’t poison - people are happy to simply blame the ‘vid.
There was a massive study in Israel that tied myocarditis to the vax (because the unvaxed control group didn’t see any increase in heart injuries from covid). No one cares, though.
This is the highest quality study that I have seen that draws a direct causal link between the mrna injection and myocarditis because it actively looked for signs of myocarditis in booster recipients post 'vaccination' rather than correlating data on, eg, hospital visits for myocarditis of mrna injected vs control. That is, the other studies have been 'reactive', so to speak, rather than proactively looking for damage as this one did.
It looks pretty compelling to me, and in a way that will be harder for the MSM and elites to ignore; that is, a direct causal link from injection to heart damage in a very significant percentage of recipients. I have no doubt that they will downplay it, of course, but this one just might break through.
Now did all 777 participants get the real vaccine, or did some of them receive a placebo, as apparently was a frequent occurrence?
Because that would change the numbers.
I'm no expert on heart health but I've heard many times that there is no 'mild and transitory' heart injury. Anyone care to weigh in on this?
My understanding is that the 777 patients in this study all got the mrna shot and that their outcomes were compared to a matched control group.
The 1/35 who developed myocarditis in this study were reported as having 'mild and transitory' symptoms, yes (and if MSM covers this at all, they will focus on that). However, as far as I know long term prognosis for myocarditis is not well understood; it is quite possible that even mild cases have negative longer term health consequences.
Also, "Patients in this study were warned not to exercise for 30 days after vaccination if myocardial injury markers were detected." That is, they were given advice that the general public has not been given and which may have had mitigating effects on myocarditis damage sustained.
The study doesn't mention a control group as it was focused on male versus female outcomes (20 out of the 22 were women, btw).
The author mentions that the rate is much higher than expected, and there is a high number of subjects which reduces the possibility of statistical clustering, but the lack of control group and counting people as vaxx injured unless they had an "alternative explanation" certainly justifies a study focused specifically on heart damage after jabbing.
They used a covariant matched control group, which is statistically valid but not as high quality as an in study control, of course.
And yes, the 'alternative explanation' thing needs more looking into; they threw out nearly half of the elevated troponin readings as not jab related without explanation. That is, even their alarmingly high reported myocarditis incidence may be conservative.
Oh, I've added a new video to OP. Dr. Prasad's analysis is excellent, if you haven't seen it.
Which is also to say any negative effects will be much harder to pin directly on the jab.
Don't let the vaxtards downplay this :
this is the documented, lab-comfirmed proof that the injections cause heart damage at a rate of 1-in-35.
That the people ( specifically told NOT TO EXERCISE to avoid a heart attack ) didn't die then dosen't undo the heart damage.
See, this was my understanding as well but:
What gives?
The acute phase when your heart simply stops under stress pases.
The dead cardiac cells aren't comming back, that damage is one extra degradation of the heart, accumulating with what happens along the years untill it's too much.
And the "experts" here said we should get 4 of these boosters every year.
For those who don't want to read the paper, there's a doctor/professor talking about the preprint of this paper.
Thank you for that; Dr. Prasad's analysis is excellent. I've added your link to OP.
Myocarditis is just the tip of the iceberg too.