I had this sort of argument with a (male) feminist claiming women can be just as good as men, nay! better even! at fighting, because they can compensate by better technique.
Well, the males can also improve their technique and destroy the female opponents.
Because men are physically superior. Something that is now taboo to say in certain circles, despite the very existence of women's divisions in sports tacitly admitting it is so.
Feminists will also cringe and reee if, after getting them to admit that, you point out chess and other sort of mental competitions have women's divisions too...
I've seen so many street interviews where they ask women what women are better at than men, and 9/10 are conditioned to answer, "everything!"
It's absurd how far removed from reality they are. Even though most of them probably don't actually believe that, they still have an insanely warped view of the differences between the two genders.
The thing they name the most besides "everything" is multi-tasking, but that's based on junk science and isn't even true.
even if we assumed men and women were exactly equal, because men have higher criminality, the bottom 5% of men or so are removed from or disengaged from society. so the average man walking around in public is already slightly better than the average woman walking around in public.
but life doesn't operate on averages anymore. in an increasingly specialized society, it's not about the averages anymore. it's the top 10%, 5%, 1%, even 0.1%. and that's where the higher variance in male aptitude shines.
for example, before trannies wrecked powerlifting records, a bench press of 230 lbs as a woman would put you as one of the top 1000 strongest women in history. as a man? you're nobody with a 230lb bench. fucking nobody.
and look at IQ... at 120 IQ, 66% are males. at 130 IQ, it's past 80%, and by 150+ IQ, it's over 99% male.
when organizations discriminate so heavily against men, filling the ranks with diversity hires who are definitionally substandard, the average man in any particular achievement group is head and shoulders above the average woman in that same group. the guys who were only slightly better didn't make it in, and the girls who were significantly worse were still allowed in because of diversity quotas. definitionally, the women are worse.
here's the kicker though... there will be no reckoning. society won't wake up to reconcile with this delusion. instead, the people who ignore reality will just be replaced. look at france and sweden. their local feminist populations are pushing for their own extermination and replacement. both countries have less than 10 years before orthodox muslims who look at women as no more than cattle, will be the voting majority.
It's all from Philosophers from the 60s and 70s trying to build women up with compliments. They don't mean the actual stuff men do, but today the entire statement is misused to the extreme.
The problem has been to lift women up, they have been denigrating men. So, now we have women convinced they can take on Juan, so they can take on Jamal.
I mean it was the same with poker for a while. They had women's only events that men could "technically" enter, albeit it was frowned upon. Back in I think 2012 a man did enter and finished 4th, forcing them to change the rules a bit (now women enter for 1/50th of the cost of men, making it less appealing).
I had this sort of argument with a (male) feminist claiming women can be just as good as men, nay! better even! at fighting, because they can compensate by better technique.
Well, the males can also improve their technique and destroy the female opponents.
Because men are physically superior. Something that is now taboo to say in certain circles, despite the very existence of women's divisions in sports tacitly admitting it is so.
Feminists will also cringe and reee if, after getting them to admit that, you point out chess and other sort of mental competitions have women's divisions too...
I've seen so many street interviews where they ask women what women are better at than men, and 9/10 are conditioned to answer, "everything!"
It's absurd how far removed from reality they are. Even though most of them probably don't actually believe that, they still have an insanely warped view of the differences between the two genders.
The thing they name the most besides "everything" is multi-tasking, but that's based on junk science and isn't even true.
even if we assumed men and women were exactly equal, because men have higher criminality, the bottom 5% of men or so are removed from or disengaged from society. so the average man walking around in public is already slightly better than the average woman walking around in public.
but life doesn't operate on averages anymore. in an increasingly specialized society, it's not about the averages anymore. it's the top 10%, 5%, 1%, even 0.1%. and that's where the higher variance in male aptitude shines.
for example, before trannies wrecked powerlifting records, a bench press of 230 lbs as a woman would put you as one of the top 1000 strongest women in history. as a man? you're nobody with a 230lb bench. fucking nobody.
and look at IQ... at 120 IQ, 66% are males. at 130 IQ, it's past 80%, and by 150+ IQ, it's over 99% male.
when organizations discriminate so heavily against men, filling the ranks with diversity hires who are definitionally substandard, the average man in any particular achievement group is head and shoulders above the average woman in that same group. the guys who were only slightly better didn't make it in, and the girls who were significantly worse were still allowed in because of diversity quotas. definitionally, the women are worse.
here's the kicker though... there will be no reckoning. society won't wake up to reconcile with this delusion. instead, the people who ignore reality will just be replaced. look at france and sweden. their local feminist populations are pushing for their own extermination and replacement. both countries have less than 10 years before orthodox muslims who look at women as no more than cattle, will be the voting majority.
good fucking luck with that ladies.
It's all from Philosophers from the 60s and 70s trying to build women up with compliments. They don't mean the actual stuff men do, but today the entire statement is misused to the extreme.
The problem has been to lift women up, they have been denigrating men. So, now we have women convinced they can take on Juan, so they can take on Jamal.
I mean it was the same with poker for a while. They had women's only events that men could "technically" enter, albeit it was frowned upon. Back in I think 2012 a man did enter and finished 4th, forcing them to change the rules a bit (now women enter for 1/50th of the cost of men, making it less appealing).
Weird, eh? What would make men better at a game with no real physical requirement?
Long term planning and overall intellect.