Don't be a retard, it means the government pays a health benefit from the taxes they already steal from us and every American is eligible. You pick your policy, your provider, but drug prices are set to a schedule so Pharma and TheInsurance cartel don't fuck us over.
Or are you also against Medicare and Social Security?
but drug prices are set to a schedule so Pharma and TheInsurance cartel don't fuck us over.
You need to read some Thomas Sowell.
And it's amusing that you think that pharma and insurance companies won't just corrupt the government (oh wait, they already have) to enrich themselves.
Exactly, They are the same people. Pharma companies are headed by people that just left the FDA who are headed by people that just left the pharma company.
But sure, universal Healthcare will change that according to the dummy you're responding to.
Or are you also against Medicare and Social Security?
I am legitimately against both of them.
For social security, it's a pyramid scheme that is enforced at government gunpoint. Even if it wasn't being horribly mismanaged, the demographic changes over the past couple decades mean I wouldn't expect to get much money out of it when I retire, and given the mismanagement I have absolutely 0 expectations of getting any money out of it.
As for medicare, not only does it have the same problem as Social Security but it pays doctors less than cost in a number of cases. This leads to a bunch of doctors who just flat out don't take it, and even for doctors who take it that just raises the prices for everyone else because the costs need to be covered somehow.
Now, the people who have spent their lives paying into these things and are relying on them do need to get some kind of compensation but the programs need to be phased out.
Don't be a retard, it means the government pays a health benefit from the taxes they already steal from us and every American is eligible. You pick your policy, your provider, but drug prices are set to a schedule so Pharma and TheInsurance cartel don't fuck us over.
Or are you also against Medicare and Social Security?
unironically still being said by libs in 2023. /roll
I loled at this, glad you saw it too
I completely see your point. Obama/Romney Care was a total scam.
ACA is a handout to the insurance cartel.
You need to read some Thomas Sowell.
And it's amusing that you think that pharma and insurance companies won't just corrupt the government (oh wait, they already have) to enrich themselves.
Exactly, They are the same people. Pharma companies are headed by people that just left the FDA who are headed by people that just left the pharma company.
But sure, universal Healthcare will change that according to the dummy you're responding to.
I'm in favor of universal health care as long as it comes with a requirement of 100 IQ or higher to qualify.
Yes I am. They are scams and pyramid schemes designed to bilk the average retard into paying the government for poor service.
I am legitimately against both of them.
For social security, it's a pyramid scheme that is enforced at government gunpoint. Even if it wasn't being horribly mismanaged, the demographic changes over the past couple decades mean I wouldn't expect to get much money out of it when I retire, and given the mismanagement I have absolutely 0 expectations of getting any money out of it.
As for medicare, not only does it have the same problem as Social Security but it pays doctors less than cost in a number of cases. This leads to a bunch of doctors who just flat out don't take it, and even for doctors who take it that just raises the prices for everyone else because the costs need to be covered somehow.
Now, the people who have spent their lives paying into these things and are relying on them do need to get some kind of compensation but the programs need to be phased out.
He probably is.
I am. What's to like about a pyramid scheme that's running out of money and hemorrhaging money from incompetence by the minute?
But then again you still think covid jabs work lol.
You've been saying that for decades now...
What is the criterion for 'work'?