"This behavior is inappropriate and disrespectful for any event at the White House. It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ families or the other hundreds of guests who were in attendance. Individuals in the video will not be invited to future events," the statement read.
Montoya also captured an interaction with Biden himself in the video. The influencer smiles next to the President and says, "It's an honor, Mr. President. Trans rights are human rights."
Biden is then seen holding the camera in an attempt to take a selfie with Montoya and other attendees, but the camera was set to video mode.
This made me laugh.
Seriously though fucking over children = not a problem, showing your tits = ban? Who the fuck is making these decisions?
It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ ''families''
Oh, it's quite reflective.
Imagine you're a hardworking proud American in the 50s and someone tells you this is the future of your country you're so patriotic about, maybe with an ounce of critical thinking you'd start questioning if you joined the right side in the fruitful event some 10 years prior.
Not sending the useless gender to the trenches and being sane enough to understand that you at least physically need a woman to not go extinct as a nation instead of deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law' becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.
Funny enough the person who showed "her" tits is a male, so I guess the queers could say this whole banning thing is "gender affirming" since then having a problem with the toplessness means they "validate her girliness"??
This made me laugh.
Seriously though fucking over children = not a problem, showing your tits = ban? Who the fuck is making these decisions?
Oh, it's quite reflective.
Imagine you're a hardworking proud American in the 50s and someone tells you this is the future of your country you're so patriotic about, maybe with an ounce of critical thinking you'd start questioning if you joined the right side in the fruitful event some 10 years prior.
It would have been worse. The overvaluation of women by that ideology is worse than even the modern day.
Probably would, for you and your kind.
Not sending the useless gender to the trenches and being sane enough to understand that you at least physically need a woman to not go extinct as a nation instead of deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
Paul Krugman.
Funny enough the person who showed "her" tits is a male, so I guess the queers could say this whole banning thing is "gender affirming" since then having a problem with the toplessness means they "validate her girliness"??
Holy shit..... that might be the reason.
4D (maybe even 5D) chess for the win!