It is not reflective of the event we hosted to celebrate LGBTQI+ ''families''
Oh, it's quite reflective.
Imagine you're a hardworking proud American in the 50s and someone tells you this is the future of your country you're so patriotic about, maybe with an ounce of critical thinking you'd start questioning if you joined the right side in the fruitful event some 10 years prior.
Not sending the useless gender to the trenches and being sane enough to understand that you at least physically need a woman to not go extinct as a nation instead of deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law' becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.
Took you quite literally a minute to reply with that, I am impressed. With how fast you've not just thought of a certain quote, but also pulled it out, only indicates to me that you have some personal file with a collection of various quotes, curious what else it contains and how is it organized?
Unfortunately however, I'm failing to see how exactly does my statement remind you of that quote which honestly has nothing to do with what I've said, nor is it similar conceptually, mine is a matter of fact, yours is just a wrong prophecy. How exactly did your ambitious mind short circuit to make a connection between the two? I'm curious.
Oh, it's quite reflective.
Imagine you're a hardworking proud American in the 50s and someone tells you this is the future of your country you're so patriotic about, maybe with an ounce of critical thinking you'd start questioning if you joined the right side in the fruitful event some 10 years prior.
It would have been worse. The overvaluation of women by that ideology is worse than even the modern day.
Probably would, for you and your kind.
Not sending the useless gender to the trenches and being sane enough to understand that you at least physically need a woman to not go extinct as a nation instead of deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
Paul Krugman.
Took you quite literally a minute to reply with that, I am impressed. With how fast you've not just thought of a certain quote, but also pulled it out, only indicates to me that you have some personal file with a collection of various quotes, curious what else it contains and how is it organized?
Unfortunately however, I'm failing to see how exactly does my statement remind you of that quote which honestly has nothing to do with what I've said, nor is it similar conceptually, mine is a matter of fact, yours is just a wrong prophecy. How exactly did your ambitious mind short circuit to make a connection between the two? I'm curious.