Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
deluding yourself with some insane concepts such as artificial pregnancies is not overvaluation.
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
The growth of the Internet will slow drastically, as the flaw in ‘Metcalfe’s law' becomes apparent: most people have nothing to say to each other! By 2005, it will become clear that the Internet’s impact on the economy has been no greater than the fax machine’s.
Took you quite literally a minute to reply with that, I am impressed. With how fast you've not just thought of a certain quote, but also pulled it out, only indicates to me that you have some personal file with a collection of various quotes, curious what else it contains and how is it organized?
Unfortunately however, I'm failing to see how exactly does my statement remind you of that quote which honestly has nothing to do with what I've said, nor is it similar conceptually, mine is a matter of fact, yours is just a wrong prophecy. How exactly did your ambitious mind short circuit to make a connection between the two? I'm curious.
does my statement remind you of that quote which honestly has nothing to do with what I've said, nor is it similar conceptually, mine is a matter of fact, yours is just a wrong prophecy. How exactly did your ambitious mind short circuit to make a connection between the two? I'm curious.
Everyone who bets that technological progress won't happen is always wrong, often hilariously so.
Artificial pregnancies will happen, within our lifetimes. Assuming we're around 30, by the time we retire, it will have replaced fertility treatment and surrogacy.
Everyone who bets that technological progress won't happen is always wrong, often hilariously so.
One very important thing that you're completely missing here is the fact that this is a 2 way street, those who bet that technological progress will advance so fast that we will have artificial pregnancies and terraform Mars and increase the average life span to 300 years are also always wrong, often hilariously so.
Assuming we're around 30, by the time we retire, it will have replaced fertility treatment and surrogacy.
I don't see this happening even if you get put as the CEO himself of whichever company is working on this with unlimited budget. You also seem to be unable to see past your delusions as you're incapable of understanding that the vast majority of males don't want this, to conceive a child with a petri dish and voluntarily become single fathers, in fact, this whole artificial pregnancy concept sounds like something straight out of a radical feminist's mind, as I can see only them being the target audience for such an insane and vile concept, it's so ironic that it's actually coming from you, the supposed saviour of the male gender. Imp's male future ladies and gentlement: rampant porn consumption and voluntary single fatherhood, sign me up! Not.
Let's even walk down a hypothetical line and say that you're right, they will happen, do you really think they will be common place? Available to you? To me? To the common man? Nah, this will be reserved for the fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population.
You can't go far wrong betting there will be progress, but our ability to predict exactly what that progress will be is pretty shite.
AI is actually pretty good at the things we thought it would learn last, like art. And yet flying cars aren't here. Politics killed the free energy from nuclear. Lightbulbs and engines were the same basic tech for like 100 years, hell, except for photovoltatic (and even then most system do), we're still using h20 and steam to produce energy.
Those who predict specific progress like that are almost always wrong also, often hilariously so, and there's a lot of inertia and 'technically better, but to swap everything would be too massive an undertaking' issues.
Only people that would benefit from a government backed by women's groups are...
This reminds me of a quote of one of women's worst propagandists from the NYT.
Paul Krugman.
Took you quite literally a minute to reply with that, I am impressed. With how fast you've not just thought of a certain quote, but also pulled it out, only indicates to me that you have some personal file with a collection of various quotes, curious what else it contains and how is it organized?
Unfortunately however, I'm failing to see how exactly does my statement remind you of that quote which honestly has nothing to do with what I've said, nor is it similar conceptually, mine is a matter of fact, yours is just a wrong prophecy. How exactly did your ambitious mind short circuit to make a connection between the two? I'm curious.
Everyone who bets that technological progress won't happen is always wrong, often hilariously so.
Artificial pregnancies will happen, within our lifetimes. Assuming we're around 30, by the time we retire, it will have replaced fertility treatment and surrogacy.
One very important thing that you're completely missing here is the fact that this is a 2 way street, those who bet that technological progress will advance so fast that we will have artificial pregnancies and terraform Mars and increase the average life span to 300 years are also always wrong, often hilariously so.
I don't see this happening even if you get put as the CEO himself of whichever company is working on this with unlimited budget. You also seem to be unable to see past your delusions as you're incapable of understanding that the vast majority of males don't want this, to conceive a child with a petri dish and voluntarily become single fathers, in fact, this whole artificial pregnancy concept sounds like something straight out of a radical feminist's mind, as I can see only them being the target audience for such an insane and vile concept, it's so ironic that it's actually coming from you, the supposed saviour of the male gender. Imp's male future ladies and gentlement: rampant porn consumption and voluntary single fatherhood, sign me up! Not.
Let's even walk down a hypothetical line and say that you're right, they will happen, do you really think they will be common place? Available to you? To me? To the common man? Nah, this will be reserved for the fraction of a fraction of a percent of the population.
Where's my flying car imp?
You can't go far wrong betting there will be progress, but our ability to predict exactly what that progress will be is pretty shite.
AI is actually pretty good at the things we thought it would learn last, like art. And yet flying cars aren't here. Politics killed the free energy from nuclear. Lightbulbs and engines were the same basic tech for like 100 years, hell, except for photovoltatic (and even then most system do), we're still using h20 and steam to produce energy.
Those who predict specific progress like that are almost always wrong also, often hilariously so, and there's a lot of inertia and 'technically better, but to swap everything would be too massive an undertaking' issues.
They exist, you just need a pilot's license.