Not to defend that guy, as he was an actual Nazi, but he was not drunk while driving, he was actually threatened, he did not have premeditation, and he didn't set out to murder any individual.
On the other hand, this commie called the police after doing his crime, so he did one thing better than the Nazi.
Sad that after all these years and seeing the gaslighting and escalating degeneracy happen in real time you're still swallowing the 'nazis bad!' bullshit.
The narrative about Nazis and WWII might be deeply skewed, but I don't understand how people can think being a Nazi or Nazi supporter can be a winning move. The well is completely poisoned and when Neo Nazis show up and do their heil hitler shit it only destroys the credibility of whatever they're supporting. Which might be the intention.
The only thing this Nazi stuff has going for it is that if it does get people on side, they're likely to be people who don't give even the slightest shit about being called racist or whatever. They're not going to back down easily. But I don't think that's enough of a benefit to outweigh the overwhelming antipathy 99% of the population has toward the word 'Nazi'.
I should have been more clear. I'm not calling James Fields anything. I'm saying that it doesn't really matter if the Nazis were good or bad, anything Nazi-related is absolute poison that does nothing for us. The damage is done, the propaganda was too effective, that is now scorched and irradiated earth. Hitler was the biggest, most evil and irredeemable villain in the history of earth and anyone who speaks his name with anything but disgust deserves a slow and painful death. That is how almost everybody on the planet feels about it, on a deeply visceral level that is immune to logic, and I don't see it ever changing.
Just by posting here, you are a nazi and a nazi supporter.
They use that label for anyone they mildly disagree with. Using the label for ourselves is a different matter entirely, that's when normies rev up their hate engines. It is in no way constructive to be heiling and saluting in the streets.
Even on their own terms, Nazis were bad. They got themselves into a war that lead to the destruction of their movement and their country.
What, do you think that the only response to the degeneracy that they have spread in the past few decades is to become a Nazi? What about the 1980s years that preceded it, which had none of that?
To say that the Nazis correctly identified the architects of Weimer degeneracy is to assert that their interpretation of Judeo-Capitalism and Judeo-Bolshevism is correct, which is an inherent violation of Rule 16.
Until they made the mistake of fighting a war on two fronts, Nazism worked.
There was only one front. Britain was a factor of no consequence, having basically no army at all.
And even you downplay this, it seems like a pretty big deal... a "mistake" that leads to the destruction of your country, occupation and mass death.
They stamped out the wanton degeneracy that plagued the Weimar republic
And started concentration camps and mass pogroms.
became an industrial and economic powerhouse despite the great depression and punitive restitutions from WW1
Germany never paid that much in terms of restitutions to begin with, and the Nazis didn't do so at all. So not 'despite'. Germany was always an economic powerhouse, having been England's better in terms of industrial production since ca. the turn of the 20th century.
and b) those who they correctly identified as the architects of the Weimer degeneracy
Oh? Do tell.
spent the following decades influencing pop culture, education, and law.
Incredible how you downplay what they did as merely 'identify' people, rather than sending millions of people to gas chambers including children. Yeah, I'm sure those children were the REAL VILLAINS.
Hard to argue against the outlandish claims against the Nazis when in many countries it's outright illegal to do so.
Bullshit. That is just your fig leaf for being unable to defend the Nazis.
Do tell why you think that it's so great to murder millions of people in Eastern Europe to make 'Lebensraum' for Germans.
Not sure my country is yours, but I'd rather that you take back your country than that no one good wins.
The Nazis weren't really fighting globalists. The 'belle epoque' before World War I was the heyday of globalism, and even that was just mostly economic globalization and a homogeniziation of elites - not the kind of globohomo we see today.
There were just a lot of crazy ideas after 1789. One of those crazy ideas was communism, the other was Nazism/fascism.
Not to defend that guy, as he was an actual Nazi, but he was not drunk while driving, he was actually threatened, he did not have premeditation, and he didn't set out to murder any individual.
On the other hand, this commie called the police after doing his crime, so he did one thing better than the Nazi.
Sad that after all these years and seeing the gaslighting and escalating degeneracy happen in real time you're still swallowing the 'nazis bad!' bullshit.
Because he's a leftist himself. What else would you expect?
The narrative about Nazis and WWII might be deeply skewed, but I don't understand how people can think being a Nazi or Nazi supporter can be a winning move. The well is completely poisoned and when Neo Nazis show up and do their heil hitler shit it only destroys the credibility of whatever they're supporting. Which might be the intention.
The only thing this Nazi stuff has going for it is that if it does get people on side, they're likely to be people who don't give even the slightest shit about being called racist or whatever. They're not going to back down easily. But I don't think that's enough of a benefit to outweigh the overwhelming antipathy 99% of the population has toward the word 'Nazi'.
And you have already conceded the lefts assertions: that James Fields was a nazi.
Let me give you a clue. Just by posting here, you are a nazi and a nazi supporter.
I should have been more clear. I'm not calling James Fields anything. I'm saying that it doesn't really matter if the Nazis were good or bad, anything Nazi-related is absolute poison that does nothing for us. The damage is done, the propaganda was too effective, that is now scorched and irradiated earth. Hitler was the biggest, most evil and irredeemable villain in the history of earth and anyone who speaks his name with anything but disgust deserves a slow and painful death. That is how almost everybody on the planet feels about it, on a deeply visceral level that is immune to logic, and I don't see it ever changing.
They use that label for anyone they mildly disagree with. Using the label for ourselves is a different matter entirely, that's when normies rev up their hate engines. It is in no way constructive to be heiling and saluting in the streets.
Commander Rockwell said the later part that’s exactly why he did it infact
Even on their own terms, Nazis were bad. They got themselves into a war that lead to the destruction of their movement and their country.
What, do you think that the only response to the degeneracy that they have spread in the past few decades is to become a Nazi? What about the 1980s years that preceded it, which had none of that?
You never heard about it? Might want to read a history book.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Removed for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
To say that the Nazis correctly identified the architects of Weimer degeneracy is to assert that their interpretation of Judeo-Capitalism and Judeo-Bolshevism is correct, which is an inherent violation of Rule 16.
There was only one front. Britain was a factor of no consequence, having basically no army at all.
And even you downplay this, it seems like a pretty big deal... a "mistake" that leads to the destruction of your country, occupation and mass death.
And started concentration camps and mass pogroms.
Germany never paid that much in terms of restitutions to begin with, and the Nazis didn't do so at all. So not 'despite'. Germany was always an economic powerhouse, having been England's better in terms of industrial production since ca. the turn of the 20th century.
Oh? Do tell.
Incredible how you downplay what they did as merely 'identify' people, rather than sending millions of people to gas chambers including children. Yeah, I'm sure those children were the REAL VILLAINS.
Bullshit. That is just your fig leaf for being unable to defend the Nazis.
Do tell why you think that it's so great to murder millions of people in Eastern Europe to make 'Lebensraum' for Germans.
Comment Reported for: Rule 16 - Identity Attacks
Comment Approved: This is actually not doing that.
Not sure my country is yours, but I'd rather that you take back your country than that no one good wins.
The Nazis weren't really fighting globalists. The 'belle epoque' before World War I was the heyday of globalism, and even that was just mostly economic globalization and a homogeniziation of elites - not the kind of globohomo we see today.
There were just a lot of crazy ideas after 1789. One of those crazy ideas was communism, the other was Nazism/fascism.
Ah, Merchant of Venice still doing his ''muh nazi'' routine, I see some things never change around KiA.
Guyyyyys, he's doing it again.
What?