So we are more than a month into the budweiser one and it's been longer for the hogwarts one so let's see the affects.
So the recent one first, they're MASSIVELY losing money, a large percentage of their consumers have switched, they got downgraded by banks because of the damage to it's product's image and it seems to just continue as they now run around like headless chickens trying to put out fires with petrol everytime they make a statement.
Now the hogwarts one, well the complete opposite. WB is going harder into the franchise even setting out a 10 year series based on the books, it made bank for the studio. It created a big wedge between streamers and the left and it's highlighted all the issues with any vtuber agencies that has left leaning bias the biggest one of these was Nijisanji. A talent called Zaion got fired and the company created a huge list of grievances of why she was fired, but then she responded and turns out most of it was bs, they seemed really to target her after she said that Nijisanji didn't want them playing hogwarts for the drama during a stream. Since then she's been independent and Nijisanji is making drama everyday from news that talents only getting 2% from merch sales (compared to Hololive getting between 25-50%), suspensions disguised as breaks and extreme amounts of miss management.
Then there's the other one involved in drama Vshojo, they recently lost 3 members with Silvervale, a main target gone because of a new contract (but there was implications she left because of lack of support when she was targeted) and as a result according to Kson, the rest got a better contract (probably to stop more from leaving).
The biggest 'win' though for the left was Pikamee going and that will be their crown....wait what, she's back as Henya under Vshojo, well shit then the left have won nothing, not even a phyricc victory.
So does this mean the right can finally do a successful boycott or is this easier to do with pisswater and is the left now too weak and despised that their boycotts are not just useless but emboldens the otherside and normies? Who knows, I'm mostly making this to rub salt especially since the twitter freaks are now admitting to the harassment because of Henya's debut trying to imply that them harassing her wasn't bad because she's with a new company. Room temperature IQ this lot.
To be honest, the main problem is that the right was already drinking the pisswater. The power of the boycott was there because the boomer normies were surprised to see "weird gay shit".
True when there's SO many better options, hell it's probably easy to make your own nowadays.
That's not true, though, because Budweiser has seen many gay and feminist commercials (some even during the Super bowl, involving Amy Schumer and man-baby Seth Rogen). And it's been going on since 2014, at the very least. This Dulvaney thing is something else.
No one even wants to know who this 'Dulvaney' creature is and why he's suddenly creeping up everywhere, including the White House. It's completely artificial and the individual himself is completely repellent in voice, appearance and mannerisms.
It's easy to say no to such a creep.
I was being reductionist, but you repeated said what I was trying to get at.
It's funny to see the Bud commercials they're flooding the media with now... all Clydesdales and traditional Americana. They're trying hard to reclaim their brand image, but it's not going to work.
Nothing short of a clear statement from the top brass along the lines of "We should have never tried to push the LGBTQ agenda on our customers. It was a huge mistake and we're sorry we tried to do it. We'll never do it again." has a chance of saving them. Of course, they're never going to do that, so...
nothing less than the ceo, in tears, begging for forgiveness.
While I enjoy the dabbing on trannies and their failures, its really incomparable between the two.
One boycott involved not buying a one time purchase game, the other involved breaking a near lifetime tradition. The first you could buy just to dab on the trannies, and maybe get a good game out of for the week. The other you had to commit to buying, and drinking, pisswater for a long time to even make a blip.
It was dog easy to make the boycott for Hogwarts fail. The Bud one had no chance of failing once it reached enough ears. Because the guys who drink Bud aren't terminally online enough to care about being progress, but their social circles are surrounded by good ol' boys who will absolutely call them fags once the idea has been planted. And changing from Bud to any other cheap beer involves literally no actual difference in their life.
Good points, though I'm just hoping despite the differences, they help in building up momentum to the pendulum swing.
I mean, it involves drinking better cheap beer. Bud is the worst of the cheap, domestic beers.
Coors blows them out of the water.
Once you've reached such a low level, there is no difference. Feces studded with corn is no difference than just regular shit.
Make sure you don’t accidentally buy any of Anheuser Busch’s other beers :
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anheuser-Busch_brands
And this was despite efforts from nationalists like Donald Trump Jr trying to get people to end the boycott against Budweiser.
Moral of the story: Don't try to insist national pride or 'made in America' sentiments to a shit product
Anything that supports women's agenda will win.
Nothing has changed, the Budweiser boycott has the backing of the WEF who started the TERF cult.
WEF throw money around so much that I get the impression some of the 'WEF supported' figures are red herrings designed to take you off the scent of who they actually are backing. I'm more on actions and the Budweiser one seems like the classic 'let's expand our consumers who are mostly Conservative to the left'.
This exactly. They thought they could score points with the tranny crowd and were apparently oblivious to what seems like the obvious resulting backlash from their core customer base.
Unsurprisingly, the market for cheap swill beer with the far left isn't very large, and probably won't be growing.
It's not necessarily aimed at us: the WEF looks good if they can imply that their mentorship helped a successful person advance to their current leadership position. If you're offering people a deal with the devil, every up-and-comer you can take credit for is another reason to accept, even if they were never initiated into the conspiracy.
The fact remains that the first women's sports shill, Tulsi Gabbard, was a WEF Global Leader.
Accordingly, TERFism is a WEF agenda.
You think Tulsi Gabbard was the first women's sports shill?
You have completely lost your grip on reality.