Thread by @michaeljknowles on Thread Reader App
@michaeljknowles: Transheuser-Busch is still scrambling over the Mulvaney beer can as sales continue to tank. But it’s caught between a rock of customers and a hard place called “GARM,” a WEF-backed operation which ...…
Fortunately they are extremely easy to boycott. Also, is hard to not notice that white women seem to be pushing this trans crap the most. This is why I agree with TheImp on this one, let women sort the trans sports and trans bathroom stuff as long as we keep their ideology away from kids.
Trump had the right take on this issue, stop it hurting kids and then leave it.
But of course, the "muh degeneracy" brigade had to step in and demand the whole GOP platform had to be about this shit.
If they really want to stop it, maybe address the root cause, women's domination of children's lives and society in general.
That's an interesting way to say establishment campaign to distract right-wing voters from more important issues that they don't want to address.
What issues do you have in mind?
Campaign finance would be my #1 pick. How many millions in literal bribes did the "Clinton Foundation" take?
Etc etc.
Knowles is right, this is an untenable position.
If transgenderism can be true for adults, then it makes no logical sense why it also isn't true for kids. From there it then follows that not transing the kids is incredibly cruel. Forcing them to grow into 6'2 deep-voiced hulking hairy brutes when they are actually women inside before allowing them to add fake tits as adults, when we can give them blockers and hormones to let them grow to actually resemble women? Transing them earlier would be the compassionate policy.
Trump's policy is the losing one that conservatives have adopted for too long, it is always compromising and accepting the newly ratcheted leftist position from 5 years back, but no further!*
*for now, we promise, but when you ratchet it further, we'll compromise again and insist it stop or at least slow down slightly.
It is illogical. Don't just push for the status quo, push the window back the other way. That's how you actually achieve the compromise position as your worstcase scenatio, and achieve what you want to achieve best case.
The same goes for your women focused stuff. The window needs to be pushed by people articulating it well, and you need to advocate for a position closer to your ideal, rather than what you'd settle for, that's negotiating and politics 101. That doesn't mean you always need to reveal your true power, what it means is don't start from whatever the compromise position is.
what would be the proper revanchist stance?
Probably acknowledging that transgender propaganda is insane degeneracy, that there are immutable differences between men and women, and that even the best surgeon could never do better than make a superficial veneer in order to poorly emulate a facsimile of the appearance of the other sex on their patients.
Someone needs to read The Transgender Industrial Complex.
InBev is a piece of shit. They buy up craft beers that are successful and destroy them instead of adding it to their portfolio simply because they don't want the competition.
To be fair, those craft brewers don't have to sell them to InBev. The responsibility is equally on them.
Unfortunately in many situations InBev targets their markets, has the distributors and salesmen go after their lines and force them into a situation where they have to sell.
It's a top down effort that involves clown's make-up.
And I stopped reading there. It's just another simp rant about "attacks on womanhood".
Why don't we talk about how the "save women's sports" cult was created by the WEF?
The first bill on it was created by WEF Global Leader Tulsi Gabbard.
It's almost like the WEF want you focused on non-issues.