>Disfigured by puberty
(media.communities.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
It is the 'correct' puberty, the problem is being too mentally disabled to see it.
They're also apparently too deficient to understand that the other puberty isn't even an option. The options are allow your biological puberty to happen or become a hybrid clusterfuck of broken systems.
Even that’s overwhelmingly generous. They will have to cake themselves in makeup everyday, have numerous cosmetic procedures, be entirely dependent on “medical care”, and dies a few decades early because your body has literally been screaming at you to stop the entire time.
I saw a troon on LibsOfTikTok explaining that going through puberty is mutilation.
No, you evil freaks. Drugging and castrating the children into being broken androgynous husks because you've taught them to hate themselves is not normal development.
Allowing their bodies to develop naturally is not mutilation.
God, and you know that teenage girls are horrifically susceptible to this as they start being confused about how to deal with male attention from their changing bodies. They already have enough problems in a normal environment 30-50 years ago with periods and breasts; the last thing they need is Feminists making them paranoid and damaged; then troons demanding they cut and drug themselves.
Let alone all the insane things that target young women like eating disorders, porn & sex work, the fashion industry which promotes insecurity, and social media.
Hey Giz!
Genuine question: If, as these people dearly wish, the procedure was to inflict surgical sterilisation upon everybody who even hinted at this at the earliest available opportunity, on the off-chance that one or two of them would benefit, would that not count as a genocide of sorts?
Yes, unequivocally.
Consider the White Genocide in Hati, or the Uyghr Genocide in China, or the Assyrian Empire's efforts at displacing and integrating the early Abrahamics (possibly Jews or proto-Jews). Or the Islamic Caliphates' efforts of exterminating ethnic groups by slavery and castration.
Castration, sterilization, eugenics, forced marriages, etc., all of these are what I would call "Breeding Control". You could call it Population Control, but that's too abstract. This is forced breeding or forced non-breeding as a political mechanism of suppression. It is usually tied with genocidal intent to eradicate both the cultural identity, and actual ethnic group of the targeted population.
There has never been a "Rebellion of the Eunuchs", there never will be, and there will never be a civilization of them either. On a societal level, Breeding Control is a social death sentence.
Gee, I wonder why the Queer Revolutionaries the follow Rousseau's logic of Civilization being oppression would want mass Breeding Control...
My god, the bitter irony of it.
A protected group that claims it is collectively the victim of "genocide" ensure their ilk will die off because they have neutered themselves. They can only replenish their ranks by making more converts from children.
They're genociding themselves!
The irony is more bitter than that.
To ensure the continuing existence of this group, they must necessarily genocide another demographic to replenish their ranks.
It's genocide all the way down...
It is gendercide.
FtM troons can stop the hormone therapy and still be fertile for the first ... five (?) years or so.
Lots of them detrans in that time. They are permanently changed, and probably will be unhappy forever, but they can still procreate.
Castration is forever.
Who said anything about not effecting boys? If anything, it clearly effects boys worse than girls by the data.
I don't tolerate the concept of woman's issues, everyone's got issues. Everything else is balkanization.
Women are weaker-willed, on average, as a generalization of population. It tends to be a neuro-chemical issue based on their hormones, and evolutionary biology of being the the child-bearers.
Porn is actually bad for you in a whole ton of specific ways, and mostly in relation to how it alters your psychology with prolonged exposure. This has larger results on society if large-scale consumption of porn is taking place regularly in society. I'd recommend Aydn Paladin's review of the psychological literature:
Even then, for women, OnlyFans is probably even worse because it promotes the development of transactional and parasocial relationships. We just don't have long enough data to condemn OnlyFans.
Women are the primary victims of ideologies they created now? Fuck off. Everyone sane knows they do it to claim the "male privilege" they think exists.
Even if I agreed with you that Women created Queer Theory (which I don't, hell women didn't even create Feminism), I would still say that the advocates of an ideology can be the primary victims of that ideology.
No one has ever killed more Communists than Communism. It's not even close. The solution is not to be caught next to them when they start purging themselves.