So much wrong with all of it, they conflate women not being charged and sentenced for committing crimes to “men commit more crime”. They also magically don’t acknowledge that private and catholic schools were wildly successful when separating gender because women are a waste in any learning environment for men. This is all hilarious since the standard teaching method since the early 20th century is almost universally acknowledged to be only beneficial to women as boys/ men learn easier and faster with hands on knowledge versus the “sit and learn” method which, much like social adherence, women thrive at.
The one question women and simps can't answer is: If women are so much better than men then why do they need all these special rights and benefits? Why do we have minister for women? Why do we have quotas? Why do we have special classes only for girls?
The very fact that these are present indicates that girls are being advantaged over boys.
I'm going to laugh when some stuck up bitch gets robbed by an "inferior" male, then she calls the cops & a woman cop shows up and says there is nothing they can do.
Could it be that boys are driven to acheive and, if you lower standards, they stop caring? Is it any surprise that a system consisting entirely of pointless busywork and forcing children to stop moving for extended periods would bore them to distraction?
Everything is easy now; what do they want? Higher standards? More discipline?
So much wrong with all of it, they conflate women not being charged and sentenced for committing crimes to “men commit more crime”. They also magically don’t acknowledge that private and catholic schools were wildly successful when separating gender because women are a waste in any learning environment for men. This is all hilarious since the standard teaching method since the early 20th century is almost universally acknowledged to be only beneficial to women as boys/ men learn easier and faster with hands on knowledge versus the “sit and learn” method which, much like social adherence, women thrive at.
There's no need to say any of this, you're giving it too much thought.
Women's bias against men is proven by an APA-approved study, and that alone proves that women's achievements in education are to be questioned.
The one question women and simps can't answer is: If women are so much better than men then why do they need all these special rights and benefits? Why do we have minister for women? Why do we have quotas? Why do we have special classes only for girls?
The very fact that these are present indicates that girls are being advantaged over boys.
I constantly see programs aimed at "girls in STEM" or "women mentoring"; I've never seen one targetted at "boys in teaching".
And yet boys still dominate girls in STEM, pretty much the only subject with hard grading standards.
I'm going to laugh when some stuck up bitch gets robbed by an "inferior" male, then she calls the cops & a woman cop shows up and says there is nothing they can do.
Where have I heard this argument before? Oh right, nig...
Now she's a vile cunt and reading this makes me wonder why we ever stopped burning witches, but ...
Ovarit?
That's boomer tier dude.
It's literally the name of the site. Dot com and everything.
Yeah I know. That's precisely what I'm saying. It's like they smashed ovary and reddit together. Boomer tier naming.
Ovarit is the women's version of this site after C decided not to let them in here.
How is it boomer? It's newer than this site.
Where is it?
I get it, it's Imp, but come on, you can right-click to search on most browsers these days: https://ovarit.com/
Archive : APA confirms female bias against males
Archive : Study confirms girls get higher grades for the same work.
Such a long essay, but no sources. Makes my life easier, because I only need two.
Women are cheats, all their achievements are stolen, and they owe the male population reparations.
On the list of the top 15 wealthiest women every single one was from inheritance or divorce. Not a single one was self made. Not one
She sourced The Guardian, lol
The Guardian doesn't count as a real source, there are school papers with better journalism.
Could it be that boys are driven to acheive and, if you lower standards, they stop caring? Is it any surprise that a system consisting entirely of pointless busywork and forcing children to stop moving for extended periods would bore them to distraction?
YES
Schools are build to suppress individuality and punish those who don't comply to the system. I wonder why boys have a harder time.
I keep telling Imp to write a novel.
He won't.
So I'll do it.
Ovarit is giving me some good material.
As for women perfoming better in iran, most aren't loyal to islam so of course they will perform better.
Uuuugbbh why is it always words x100000000