So much wrong with all of it, they conflate women not being charged and sentenced for committing crimes to “men commit more crime”. They also magically don’t acknowledge that private and catholic schools were wildly successful when separating gender because women are a waste in any learning environment for men. This is all hilarious since the standard teaching method since the early 20th century is almost universally acknowledged to be only beneficial to women as boys/ men learn easier and faster with hands on knowledge versus the “sit and learn” method which, much like social adherence, women thrive at.
So much wrong with all of it, they conflate women not being charged and sentenced for committing crimes to “men commit more crime”. They also magically don’t acknowledge that private and catholic schools were wildly successful when separating gender because women are a waste in any learning environment for men. This is all hilarious since the standard teaching method since the early 20th century is almost universally acknowledged to be only beneficial to women as boys/ men learn easier and faster with hands on knowledge versus the “sit and learn” method which, much like social adherence, women thrive at.
There's no need to say any of this, you're giving it too much thought.
Women's bias against men is proven by an APA-approved study, and that alone proves that women's achievements in education are to be questioned.