It definitely sounds like a thing Disney would do but I'll laugh if they get screwed even harder because they tried to weasel their way put of the consequences of their actions.
The fact that they are trying to weasel themselves out of consequences for their actions does show that contrary to claims by regressives and the GOP establishment, this wasn't a bunch of hot air or symbolic on the part of DeSantis.
The fact that he smashed Disney was what made me pay attention to him, so let's see what happens.
"This board loses, for practical purposes, the majority of its ability to do anything beyond maintain the roads and maintain basic infrastructure,” Peri said.
Then don't maintain them. Better yet, plow all the fucking roads that lead to Disney World up and plant grass in their place.
Yes, that's probably more legally defensible too, because Disney might be able to go after them for intentionally cutting off access to their property.
I am very interested to see how RDS will handle this. If Disney does come out ahead on this, it will show that RDS is a paper tiger. Otherwise, he's the man of 2028.
“I’m going to read to you the term of this restrictive covenant. ‘This declaration shall continue in effect until 21 years after the death of the last survivor of the descendants of King Charles III, King of England, living as of the date of this declaration,’” Peri said. “So, I mean, I don’t know what else to say."
While this sounds completely ridiculous, it's actually not uncommon in contracts.
Going back to English common law, you could not make a contract last in perpetuity so, as a workaround to make a contract last forever without saying so, they will often pick a famous dynasty that they know will never die out and condition the termination on the contract of the end of that family line.
Heard a different account to this and because they tried this, the Florida government is getting ready to sue them
It definitely sounds like a thing Disney would do but I'll laugh if they get screwed even harder because they tried to weasel their way put of the consequences of their actions.
The fact that they are trying to weasel themselves out of consequences for their actions does show that contrary to claims by regressives and the GOP establishment, this wasn't a bunch of hot air or symbolic on the part of DeSantis.
The fact that he smashed Disney was what made me pay attention to him, so let's see what happens.
The most insane part is how much the left is supporting this. Mega-corps are their best fuck buddies now.
It's the left, they'd let themselves be set on fire if it 'owned the right'
Then don't maintain them. Better yet, plow all the fucking roads that lead to Disney World up and plant grass in their place.
A better solution would be to begin adding insane tolls to all the roads for the 'maintenance' of the infrastructure and roads.
Yes, that's probably more legally defensible too, because Disney might be able to go after them for intentionally cutting off access to their property.
Sure you can, but he might own a muffler shop.
Looks at to roads doing exactly that. Looks at how they seemed to spread to all of Orange county. Never give a greedy politician an idea like that.
I am very interested to see how RDS will handle this. If Disney does come out ahead on this, it will show that RDS is a paper tiger. Otherwise, he's the man of 2028.
While this sounds completely ridiculous, it's actually not uncommon in contracts.
Going back to English common law, you could not make a contract last in perpetuity so, as a workaround to make a contract last forever without saying so, they will often pick a famous dynasty that they know will never die out and condition the termination on the contract of the end of that family line.
The more you know...
Does it hold any weight?
Oh yes, that's why it's used all the time.
Wikipedia, but useful IMO: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_against_perpetuities
inb4 disney epsteins all the royals