If you ever need to explain esg to someone just ask them if they would be happy having an person with Down syndrome managing their portfolio, if they say no, then they are against “equity” and would be docked by ESG scores.
Another fun fact - if a CEO (male or female) becomes the parent of a male child, their ESG score drops.
I thought this was a joke on your part, but unfortunately, it turned out to be just the most recent example of your inability to discern whether anything is even remotely likely.
If you have "hundreds" of reports, can you show me three that show this?
If you ever need to explain esg to someone just ask them if they would be happy having an person with Down syndrome managing their portfolio, if they say no, then they are against “equity” and would be docked by ESG scores.
The problem is they don’t know what a portfolio is
I thought this was a joke on your part, but unfortunately, it turned out to be just the most recent example of your inability to discern whether anything is even remotely likely.
If you have "hundreds" of reports, can you show me three that show this?
You're talking to Imp. He's basically as retarded as fishyman.
That's not quite the same as your initial comment. Basically if the number of female children is at least 1, it raises the likely ESG score.
That is to say having subsequent male children will not then lower the score.
A subtle difference I grant, but an important one.
It doesn't even mention ESG.
Can't stand competition, eh?
It’s a euphemism and quite probably prophetic in the grand scheme of things