Another fun fact - if a CEO (male or female) becomes the parent of a male child, their ESG score drops.
I thought this was a joke on your part, but unfortunately, it turned out to be just the most recent example of your inability to discern whether anything is even remotely likely.
If you have "hundreds" of reports, can you show me three that show this?
That's how he argues. Make wild claims, then slowly edit them each time he repeats them until they reach some form of reality and hope you don't notice.
I read your updated comment. It's beyond idiotic. That is noting a correlation, not causation. There's no one taking notes on who has a son and dropping ESG scores as a result.
I thought this was a joke on your part, but unfortunately, it turned out to be just the most recent example of your inability to discern whether anything is even remotely likely.
If you have "hundreds" of reports, can you show me three that show this?
You're talking to Imp. He's basically as retarded as fishyman.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304405X17302350
When you're ready to apologize for being wrong, do let me know. Especially if you're finally admitting TERFs are trash.
That's not quite the same as your initial comment. Basically if the number of female children is at least 1, it raises the likely ESG score.
That is to say having subsequent male children will not then lower the score.
A subtle difference I grant, but an important one.
That's how he argues. Make wild claims, then slowly edit them each time he repeats them until they reach some form of reality and hope you don't notice.
At this point he's become nothing but a weak sparring partner for people who enjoy internet discussion (hello Antonio).
He's like that white belt kid at the gym who's full of rage and always eager to spar hard but always gets his ass kicked and doesn't seem to improve.
These kids have this incredible energy and keep coming at you over and over, usually going way too hard.
I never had patience for this kind of kid, but some guys at the gym enjoyed toying with them just for the sake of it.
The thing is, kids normally grow out of this phase, but in his case I think he may be too old for that.
It doesn't even mention ESG.
CSR is ESG, you idiot. It's two names for the same thing.
More accurately, the CSR score is the G in ESG.
I read your updated comment. It's beyond idiotic. That is noting a correlation, not causation. There's no one taking notes on who has a son and dropping ESG scores as a result.