Reddit reaches their final solution in the propaganda war
(media.kotakuinaction2.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (87)
sorted by:
You talked about race, I talked about race.
I've shown multiple times there is no anti-white agenda, that it is just an anti-male agenda, but people still say the same tired bullshit.
I've read the ESG reports. I've studied their NGOs. I've archived probably a thousand websites.
Every single ESG target that mentions race, has an identical one for gender that doesn't mention race.
The primary beneficiaries of affirmative action are white women. That's why the establishment right stopped trying to repeal it and created "race-based discrimination" narratives.
There. Is. No. Race. Based. Angle.
Show me one time white women have ever been discriminated against openly in the way men are, and I'll re-evaluate my position.
HAHAHAHAHA. Oh my. Are you serious?
But it does mention race! You yourself are saying there is racial discrimination baked in. Multiple things can be true at the same time. There is an anti-male agenda, I absolutely agree. There is also an anti-white agenda. An anti-Christian agenda. A general anti-Western agenda.
Just because you hate women and think they're out to get men, doesn't mean there can't be racism. You sound like a progressive stacker when you say shit like that. You're basically saying there can't be racism because there is sexism. As I've said, there is sexism. But there is also racism.
Are you talking per capita or raw numbers? Because there are a lot more white women (for now) than there are "POCs." The ease of entry is better for nonwhites than for women, though. If we're talking something like college or hiring policies, nonwhite trumps white women. Doesn't mean the current system doesn't benefit white women - it absolutely does - but nonwhites are still higher on the totem pole. For an example, there was that guy that got into Stanford by writing "#BlackLivesMatter" like a hundred times. That was a Muslim dude.
Bruh. I can't even with you sometimes. They'll openly say they want less white people, and that they'll prop up nonwhites. This is just the tip of the iceberg, but I think it's a good example since it was such a high profile person: Joe Biden, holding the office of Vice President of the US, said it would be great when whites were a minority. The freaking VP, man. Just openly.
Also, just look at demographics. Most first-world white majority countries dropped from +90% white to ~60% white in less than a century. While our leaders fucking bragged about it.
Firstly, I'm not sure you intended to, but that massively shifts the goal posts. Why? Because, let's say for the sake of argument white women are never discriminated against. They are, which I'll get to in a second, but bear with me. Alright, white women are immune. Still doesn't preclude that white men - white men - couldn't still be discriminated against at a greater rate than nonwhite men. So even if white women were immune, there could still be race-based anti-white discrimination going on. So your request is a total non sequitur.
Anyway, when are white women discriminated against? First thing that comes to mind is something like Muslim rape gangs. White women were literally told to shut up, not report rapes, wear sneakers so they could outrun their attackers, not go out at night, etc. And, I mean, did you see what she was wearing?! That narrative was going on in Germany, Sweden, etc. Countries that were actually fairly high on the feminist list, in fact. Even women often value nonwhites over white women. A bunch of the most anti white woman rhetoric comes from white women.
For more discrimination, white women are often given less of a chance against nonwhite women in hiring and the like. Again, goes back to your non sequitur. Even if white women had a systemic advantage over all nonwhite men - they don't - they can still be given less favorability than nonwhite women.
Also, just to make it very clear, you can recognize discrimination against whites without being one of the "stormfags" you like to go on about. Just for the record, I am not a Nazi, or Nazi-adjacent. In case you want to go that route. Anti-white discrimination is blatant, and I'm sick of it. Simple as.
He is one. Exactly like Antonio. In every regard but one, he a far leftist, here posing as right wing. He's preferable to Antonio in several ways, first because he's just an idiot and not a deliberate subversive.
Don't bother trying to convince him dude, a ton of people have tried - he never changes.
I know, but it's fun anyway sometimes.
Probably helps if you're not a stormfaggot.
Nothing wrong with being a Nazi
Let's for the sake of argument say that's true. There's still something wrong with conflating Nazism with caring about white people.
No, what I'm saying is that racial solidarity is ridiculous when the other half sits on top of a pedestal so large it can be seen from space.
You're suggesting the logic is :
Women of Color™ > White women > Men
So why on earth would I defend the people trying to shut me out? Let them burn.
Correct. But no, it was actually an article that talked about it in terms of advancement. There were more white women per capita that achieved more than their GPA deserved than any other group.
Disagree. Women's utter dominance over the college space hasn't been challenged. If they were really basing it on race, they would bring in non-white men to even that out. There is clearly a conscious effort to retain a female majority at most colleges.
That was a virtue signal. They let him in to signal how goodthink they are while letting in probably a thousand more white women.
I'm going to bullet point this because it will make more sense than writing an essay.
All Western countries are built on a Ponzi scheme like Social Security that must be funded by constant growth in population.
Women became increasingly hostile until this growth was eventually unachievable.
Asking women to be good people would just get them booted out of office, so they arranged to import people from countries with high birth rates.
Women being shitty people is not a conspiracy against white people.
Cologne was proven false and Sweden is a "yes means yes" country that takes all accusations as fact, since 2015.
You basically danced around every single one of my points, and went into detail on something slightly related, so it looks like you're giving an actual rebuttal. Not sure what I expected. I'll go through this quickly, so it's not too long.
Basically, my rebuttal is: Read my comment again, and actually respond to that. But still, I'll go through this comment too.
But it's not. Women are doing better than men, but it's not the huge swing you act like. They're 50% of the population, and doing somewhat better than the other 50%. There are much bigger disparities out there.
Not what I said. Nice try, though.
Ah, I see, you're talking equality of outcome, not equality of opportunity. You do you, I suppose.
They do, you just ignore it...
Mass immigration started before the full family breakdown we see today.
Unrelated. They wanted people who could work for cheaper. It has nothing to do with office dynamics, it has to do with greed. That just happens to screw over the natives in the process.
Again, total dodge. All my comments were things people actually said. I wasn't talking rape statistics - and you think all rape is fake anyway so there's no point - I was talking how the government was treating white women, and their official responses.
But, yeah, you didn't really address any of what I said head-on, and instead went off on unrelated things...
Shit, I better tell all the negroes back home that live just to mug and rough up any white person they see they don't have an agenda. Its a secret ploy by the elite women and their "reports" that these barely literate ghetto rats totally read and march for.
I know you are retarded, but surely you understand that two things can exist at the same time right?
Woman raised criminals abused by feminist single parents are a terrible retort.
Regardless, when people talk about an agenda, they're talking about a visible, concrete plan, not Tyrone who got beat by his mom since he was 3 killing Karen.
I expect better from someone who understands what kind of people women are. You're just helping them.
That's why I said two things can exist at once. The point you didn't address at all, because I fail to see how X means that Y cannot possibly exist at all.
No, you haven't. Minority men get included in DIE shit all the time.
People who say this assume that the best thing for white women is to be dried up croon worker units with worthless degrees.
Amy Cooper, the Central Park "Karen." Bonus: You can say "Karen" in a derogatory fashion all over radlib places like "Black People Twitter." You can't use Tyrone, Jamaal, Shenequa, Shlomo, etc. in the same way. San Francisco even named a law after it.
You're not the sharpest tool in the shed
Third Wave feminism has been defined in its later years by a rejection of the interests of white women in general and criticism that female members of minority groups haven't been given their fair due in the movement. That's why the women's march pretends that crazy hijab-Muslims are somehow 'feminist', e.g. Linda Sarsour. And why big-mouth Tamika Mallory was considered a leader.