A diverse population reduces social solidarity, which is good for economic growth because people don't want wealth-
destroying policies to help out people who look different.
That’s hilariously untrue and in fact the complete opposite of reality. The lack of social solidarity is what makes “diverse” people vote for what makes them the most money, which is government handouts.
There isn’t. “White” is such a broad definition that even genetically it is more diverse than the differences between all other races. That doesn’t even begin to factor In culture or ethnicity. The whole concept of “white” was specifically Anglo-Saxon until a few decades ago.
I forget that you're "my black friends" person
I don’t know what delusional concept you’re on here other than something you made up in your head.
Ah, such fresh narratives that libs haven't been parroting for over a decade to justify mass migration into the west. In-group genetic diversity doesn't negate existence of groups. Do better.
You’re literally negating the existence of groups. Show me anywhere other than the term white where Proto Iranians are put in the same category as Anglo-saxons you blithering retard.
The very term "ethnicity" originated to replace the term "race" in effort to decouple it from biology, hence why previously "the Spanish Race," "the German Race," etc was used to refer to different groups. You'd know this if you actually read anything about the subject.
You’re so fucking deluded it’s amazing. Look up ethnicus and ethnikos you blithering retard.
And this narrative totally wasn't popularized by Noel Ignatiev. Just because different groups and preferences existed doesn't negate existence of wider groups. Furthermore, even if people used the term incorrectly historically it wouldn't negate existence of what countless people today use it to refer to.
You’re the one using the term incorrectly you blithering retard. YOUR use is not the correct use and YOU trying to change the definition like a rabid troon leftist does not make it so.
Yeah, this site is a pain in the ass to search through, so I won't forget next time that you're not only an anti-white liberal, but push outright lies about me quoting your words. It's funny, but you really out yourself with things like these, repeatedly so. Haven't you learned anything from Jack Murphy and Eliza Bleu?
The obsession is delicious, thanks for letting me live rent free in your peanut brain.
Apparently, white stops being a "communist manifestation to conglomerate 'bad' people" when you want to attack and mock whites, and praise your black friends. Then again, maybe you're just telling on yourself once more.
You caught me, saying a handful black people laughed at something that made the wilting lilies faint is clearly me “mocking whites and praising my black friends”. Any other completely delusional things you want to bring up?
AFAIK most libertarians wouldn't quote The Cato Institute these days. They do still tend to agree with open borders though, believing the narrative that "good hardworking immigrant families" will be more pro-Liberty than multi-generation Americans. (and ignoring the important cultural differences with the countries those immigrants came from...)
There was a good substack posted recently that pointed out how immigrants are NOT more biased towards conservative American values, and are easily captured by the Democrats and their social programs.
The richest countries in the world are just big clusters of people who have the same ethnicity. It's been this way for nearly all of human history, and it's not likely to change now.
That’s hilariously untrue and in fact the complete opposite of reality. The lack of social solidarity is what makes “diverse” people vote for what makes them the most money, which is government handouts.
It is also one of the most mercenary, greed-headed comments on "diversity" I have ever heard.
I'll take greater social solidarity over "economic growth" any day.
There isn’t. “White” is such a broad definition that even genetically it is more diverse than the differences between all other races. That doesn’t even begin to factor In culture or ethnicity. The whole concept of “white” was specifically Anglo-Saxon until a few decades ago.
I don’t know what delusional concept you’re on here other than something you made up in your head.
You’re literally negating the existence of groups. Show me anywhere other than the term white where Proto Iranians are put in the same category as Anglo-saxons you blithering retard.
You’re so fucking deluded it’s amazing. Look up ethnicus and ethnikos you blithering retard.
You’re the one using the term incorrectly you blithering retard. YOUR use is not the correct use and YOU trying to change the definition like a rabid troon leftist does not make it so.
The obsession is delicious, thanks for letting me live rent free in your peanut brain.
You caught me, saying a handful black people laughed at something that made the wilting lilies faint is clearly me “mocking whites and praising my black friends”. Any other completely delusional things you want to bring up?
Did you even look at your own links?! Thanks for proving my point you blithering retard
Cringe as fuck bro
I'm surprised that people in this thread suddenly took the opposite view from the one they normally do.
It's probably because thatsalright has been really retarded lately
AFAIK most libertarians wouldn't quote The Cato Institute these days. They do still tend to agree with open borders though, believing the narrative that "good hardworking immigrant families" will be more pro-Liberty than multi-generation Americans. (and ignoring the important cultural differences with the countries those immigrants came from...)
There was a good substack posted recently that pointed out how immigrants are NOT more biased towards conservative American values, and are easily captured by the Democrats and their social programs.
God, I hate Beltway Libertarians.
The richest countries in the world are just big clusters of people who have the same ethnicity. It's been this way for nearly all of human history, and it's not likely to change now.
Not defending immigration, but what about Rome?