The strong are a threat to the weak. You get a bunch of soyboys like Tim pool and throw them in prison with rabid feminists and bull dykes and it won’t be little Tim doing the raping…
Yeah, I thought that would raise some hackles. If you're at night alone and there's a woman there, she's going to be afraid of you, even if you're a good guy. If you're a woman, then not.
Did you mean to say that "men as a group are perceived as a threat by women"? As the comments here have gone over, someone having fear does not imply a threat exists. In other words, "that sounds like a you problem."
If you're at night alone and there's a woman there, she's going to be afraid of you, even if you're a good guy.
This is complete subjective, women will inherently cling to the largest, safest person as their defense mechanism. The amount of times I’ve had a random woman I’ve never met cling to me like a drunk child after the bars close until they get a ride or find their friends is basically everytime I go out.
Retweeting is not an endorsement of the tweet itself, let alone of every single comment made by that person.
Retweeting without comment can be assumed endorsement, generally. And retweeting a group that on plenty of issues goes against your stated beliefs is, at the very least, a bad look. If I'm going to share something from someone who is ideologically opposed to me, I'd certainly want to couch it in something like 'I don't agree with them on much, but they're spot on here,' or something to that effect.
Even an endorsement of that person is not an agreement with everything he has ever said. For example, I endorsed DoM, but we disagree on plenty of stuff.
with a post of how many ridiculous things are more likely than being murdered as a woman.
There's more than just murder. Besides, even if 'drowning in your bathtub' is more likely than being murdered, that would not change the normal human reaction to it. People react more strongly to murder than they do to accidents, for very good reason!
Which I'm not, and no one should be. Identitarianism is cancer.
Hell, I bet even you would not regard yourself as 'pro-men'. Do you think laws should favor men more than you think is just? No? Then you're not pro-men at least in your own reckoning.
you shouldn't be mixing yourself up with feminists for any reason.
Wrong, you mix with whoever will help deliver victory.
I don't care if they say genocide is wrong
Neither do I, if people who say genocide is good were useful, I'd make use of them.
Yes, but murder is the only one they can't fabricate, because there has to be a corpse found. Including rapes and DV would be pouring in a dataset of 90+% fictional claims.
Yeah I'm sure of that. You just picked murder because it's the unlikeliest to occur to anyone. It's like saying: how many men in the UK are guilty of genocide? ZERO! They're all totally safe.
Retweeting is not an endorsement of the tweet itself, let alone of every single comment made by that person.
That said, men as a group are a threat to women. Which is why women have separate facilities.
The more I experience this reality, the more I'm convinced it's women who are a threat to man not the other way around.
The strong are a threat to the weak. You get a bunch of soyboys like Tim pool and throw them in prison with rabid feminists and bull dykes and it won’t be little Tim doing the raping…
Amen to that. 👏
the fuck?
Yeah, I thought that would raise some hackles. If you're at night alone and there's a woman there, she's going to be afraid of you, even if you're a good guy. If you're a woman, then not.
Did you mean to say that "men as a group are perceived as a threat by women"? As the comments here have gone over, someone having fear does not imply a threat exists. In other words, "that sounds like a you problem."
This is complete subjective, women will inherently cling to the largest, safest person as their defense mechanism. The amount of times I’ve had a random woman I’ve never met cling to me like a drunk child after the bars close until they get a ride or find their friends is basically everytime I go out.
Retweeting without comment can be assumed endorsement, generally. And retweeting a group that on plenty of issues goes against your stated beliefs is, at the very least, a bad look. If I'm going to share something from someone who is ideologically opposed to me, I'd certainly want to couch it in something like 'I don't agree with them on much, but they're spot on here,' or something to that effect.
Even an endorsement of that person is not an agreement with everything he has ever said. For example, I endorsed DoM, but we disagree on plenty of stuff.
There's more than just murder. Besides, even if 'drowning in your bathtub' is more likely than being murdered, that would not change the normal human reaction to it. People react more strongly to murder than they do to accidents, for very good reason!
Which I'm not, and no one should be. Identitarianism is cancer.
Hell, I bet even you would not regard yourself as 'pro-men'. Do you think laws should favor men more than you think is just? No? Then you're not pro-men at least in your own reckoning.
Wrong, you mix with whoever will help deliver victory.
Neither do I, if people who say genocide is good were useful, I'd make use of them.
Yeah I'm sure of that. You just picked murder because it's the unlikeliest to occur to anyone. It's like saying: how many men in the UK are guilty of genocide? ZERO! They're all totally safe.