Which I'm not, and no one should be. Identitarianism is cancer.
Hell, I bet even you would not regard yourself as 'pro-men'. Do you think laws should favor men more than you think is just? No? Then you're not pro-men at least in your own reckoning.
you shouldn't be mixing yourself up with feminists for any reason.
Wrong, you mix with whoever will help deliver victory.
I don't care if they say genocide is wrong
Neither do I, if people who say genocide is good were useful, I'd make use of them.
Yes, but murder is the only one they can't fabricate, because there has to be a corpse found. Including rapes and DV would be pouring in a dataset of 90+% fictional claims.
Yeah I'm sure of that. You just picked murder because it's the unlikeliest to occur to anyone. It's like saying: how many men in the UK are guilty of genocide? ZERO! They're all totally safe.
That's a fair point, but more a semantic issue than an argument.
Correct, I didn't really like the 'pro-men' stuff.
Wrong, you're helping rehabilitate their image. They're gaining more from the alliance than you are.
I don't think your judgment on that is accurate. Regardless, even if they gained more than I do, I'm still gaining, so there is an incentive to side with them. And I don't think their image needs 'rehabilitating'. Feminists are in charge.
As I said, I picked it because they can't fabricate the existence of a corpse.
Yes, but that coincidentally also excludes all of the crimes that women fear most and are of most risk at. Even if 0 women were murdered, that would not prove that women's fears for their safety are misplaced.
Which I'm not, and no one should be. Identitarianism is cancer.
Hell, I bet even you would not regard yourself as 'pro-men'. Do you think laws should favor men more than you think is just? No? Then you're not pro-men at least in your own reckoning.
Wrong, you mix with whoever will help deliver victory.
Neither do I, if people who say genocide is good were useful, I'd make use of them.
Yeah I'm sure of that. You just picked murder because it's the unlikeliest to occur to anyone. It's like saying: how many men in the UK are guilty of genocide? ZERO! They're all totally safe.
Correct, I didn't really like the 'pro-men' stuff.
I don't think your judgment on that is accurate. Regardless, even if they gained more than I do, I'm still gaining, so there is an incentive to side with them. And I don't think their image needs 'rehabilitating'. Feminists are in charge.
Yes, but that coincidentally also excludes all of the crimes that women fear most and are of most risk at. Even if 0 women were murdered, that would not prove that women's fears for their safety are misplaced.