But single men will end up working extra hours in order to help compensate for it.
^^^^^^^ THIS IS THE COMMENT^^^^^^^ 100% correct. This is just a free week off every month for women, while men have to pick up the slack and employers are required to pay the same amount. Best case scenario, it makes women less likely to get hired for anything important.
Ironically, woman-majority or women-lead businesses literally most affected XD.
Huh? I could've sworn this was period leave. Maybe misread it? Weird. I feel like I've been gaslighted. Still, increases the burden on everyone else at cost to the employer and colleagues that need to pick up the slack. Should be a job perk if anything and not a government mandate.
These are literally bot-level responses.
No thought has been put into them whatsoever.
Crabs in a bucket mentality: A crab placed alone in a bucket will easily climb out and escape, but when you place it with a few of its mates, this interesting phenomenon occurs: One at a time, as the crabs try to escape, other crabs will pull them back down to their misery and the group's collective demise.
You did not even respond to the question. You mentioned that 2 words with different spellings are in fact 2 words with different spellings. Then you avoided the question by appealing to a crabs-in-a-bucket mentality saying someone else would "get it" and you wouldn't.
Neither of these respond to the question - how would this hurt men without children? How would this actually take anything away from them?
My understanding is that this is supposed to apply to men (as well as women) so I don't any way this would be a drawback.
What do you think happens when companies have to give more leave? I'll tell you what happens, they adjust salaries downwards, especially for new hires.
These are literally bot-level responses. No thought has been put into them whatsoever.
That’s because this community is rife with degenerate FAGTOWs who know that women are repulsed by their existence, with the Imp being their ringleader. They’re just jealous of the idea that men with wives can take time off to spend with their newborns.
To the MGTOWs: If you actually gave a damn about men’s rights like you claim, you’d be happy that men can get the same parental leave as new mothers.
I usually think theimpossible1's posts are great...sad to him to posting the same kind of stuff he's usually against, just with a different coating over it.
TBF the OP said "screwing over", not "hurting". It's a government-mandated work benefit that single men cannot receive.
But single men will end up working extra hours in order to help compensate for it.
^^^^^^^ THIS IS THE COMMENT^^^^^^^ 100% correct. This is just a free week off every month for women, while men have to pick up the slack and employers are required to pay the same amount. Best case scenario, it makes women less likely to get hired for anything important.
Ironically, woman-majority or women-lead businesses literally most affected XD.
Isn't this family leave for both men and women?
Huh? I could've sworn this was period leave. Maybe misread it? Weird. I feel like I've been gaslighted. Still, increases the burden on everyone else at cost to the employer and colleagues that need to pick up the slack. Should be a job perk if anything and not a government mandate.
These are literally bot-level responses.
No thought has been put into them whatsoever.
Crabs in a bucket mentality: A crab placed alone in a bucket will easily climb out and escape, but when you place it with a few of its mates, this interesting phenomenon occurs: One at a time, as the crabs try to escape, other crabs will pull them back down to their misery and the group's collective demise.
I did not argue an opinion. I explained to you why the OP would believe government-mandated paid leave gives men without children the shaft.
I hope you have found this answer useful. Your feedback will help me improve future responses! BEEP-BOOP
You did not even respond to the question. You mentioned that 2 words with different spellings are in fact 2 words with different spellings. Then you avoided the question by appealing to a crabs-in-a-bucket mentality saying someone else would "get it" and you wouldn't.
Neither of these respond to the question - how would this hurt men without children? How would this actually take anything away from them?
My understanding is that this is supposed to apply to men (as well as women) so I don't any way this would be a drawback.
Because they are without children.
What do you think happens when companies have to give more leave? I'll tell you what happens, they adjust salaries downwards, especially for new hires.
That’s because this community is rife with degenerate FAGTOWs who know that women are repulsed by their existence, with the Imp being their ringleader. They’re just jealous of the idea that men with wives can take time off to spend with their newborns.
To the MGTOWs: If you actually gave a damn about men’s rights like you claim, you’d be happy that men can get the same parental leave as new mothers.
I usually think theimpossible1's posts are great...sad to him to posting the same kind of stuff he's usually against, just with a different coating over it.
I don't get what you mean? I'm being consistent...
And if you were actually right wing, you'd see Pivotal Ventures at the top and know this is Melinda Gates' idea, making it unquestionably evil.
Would it help if you pretended Bill wrote it?