The court unironically asking the question "but what if the child consents" to put a child support bill on the poor kid. 30 years ago and it's still accepted case law and hasn't been overturned.
How is it any worse than a whore deciding to forgo an abortion she has the right to because she wants to extort money from the guy who may or may be the father? At least under this scenario the whore is required to take a tiny amount of responsibility.
This is pretty rare. Only really happens among the trashiest of women or strippers trying to extort politicians. At least with abortion, the men do have a way out. Almost every single man I know had got a chick pregnant and she has had an abortion. It's way more common than people realize.
Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Women's groups pushed to hold children's parents accountable for child support for female pedo rapists, so...
If she lied about being on the pill, if she put a hole in the condom, if she intentionally impregnated herself after intercourse using residual ejaculate, all of which are things that gold-digging whores do on a regular basis, then she bears 100% of the responsibility for the pregnancy.
You have the privilege of thinking that, but men who actually sleep with women have a right and a reason to be more suspicious. Especially since, as this article demonstrates there is almost no politician of any ideological predisposition who is actually willing to hold women responsible for the consequences of their own behaviour.
You have the privilege of thinking that, but men who actually sleep with women
LOL! Not sure if a comment on my bisexuality or a claim of inceldom. The latter would be funnier. But rest assured, contrary to claims, I'm not 100% a faggot.
have a right and a reason to be more suspicious.
Being suspicious is good. But that this is anything like a regular practice? Sounds like an urban legend.
Especially since, as this article demonstrates there is almost no politician of any ideological predisposition who is actually willing to hold women responsible for the consequences of their own behaviour.
This is holding men responsible for the consequences of their behavior.
My only possible objection to this is let's be real the government (Medicaid) is paying 100% of the costs for most pregnant women with no responsible father. So I'm not sure how that's supposed to work with this. But yeah they should split it.
They just suck less than the Dems in that respect. Almost no one in the party gives a shit. Besides Trump talking about false accusations during Kavanaugh's attempted lynching Josh Hawley is the only one who consistently talks about men's issues, and he's a mixed bag on that to say the least.
Is a paternity test required first?
Of course not. They don't consider men human. Why would they add requirements that prevent them from being enslaved?
I'll just leave this here..
The court unironically asking the question "but what if the child consents" to put a child support bill on the poor kid. 30 years ago and it's still accepted case law and hasn't been overturned.
Let me guess. A teacher-student rape case? *click* Wow it isn't but rather a 16 year old babysitter and a 12 year old.
Exactly, pull out method at the very least. Otherwise, don't be a fool and wrap your tool.
I see Drag propaganda everywhere
If that's what you want, that's fine.
Isn’t that what you are supposed to do as a father though?
This is why men should support abortion because tradcucks will find a way to make no abortion worse for men.
How is it any worse than a whore deciding to forgo an abortion she has the right to because she wants to extort money from the guy who may or may be the father? At least under this scenario the whore is required to take a tiny amount of responsibility.
This is pretty rare. Only really happens among the trashiest of women or strippers trying to extort politicians. At least with abortion, the men do have a way out. Almost every single man I know had got a chick pregnant and she has had an abortion. It's way more common than people realize.
It just feels like women punishing us for not supporting what they wanted.
It is but the tradcucks think they're doing the right thing.
Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Women's groups pushed to hold children's parents accountable for child support for female pedo rapists, so...
There was also a court case that set the precedent that the male minor was liable for backdated child support when they became an adult, in 1993.
Why didn't you answer the question? You think that women who are raped should have to pay the pregnancy costs? A rape tax or fine?
Women's organizations spend millions attacking men's human rights. Send the bill to them.
Father have 50% of the responsibility for the pregnancy, so it makes sense for them to bear 50% of the costs.
If she lied about being on the pill, if she put a hole in the condom, if she intentionally impregnated herself after intercourse using residual ejaculate, all of which are things that gold-digging whores do on a regular basis, then she bears 100% of the responsibility for the pregnancy.
It sounds absurd to me.
And much, much more than that. Prison, for one.
You have the privilege of thinking that, but men who actually sleep with women have a right and a reason to be more suspicious. Especially since, as this article demonstrates there is almost no politician of any ideological predisposition who is actually willing to hold women responsible for the consequences of their own behaviour.
LOL! Not sure if a comment on my bisexuality or a claim of inceldom. The latter would be funnier. But rest assured, contrary to claims, I'm not 100% a faggot.
Being suspicious is good. But that this is anything like a regular practice? Sounds like an urban legend.
This is holding men responsible for the consequences of their behavior.
My only possible objection to this is let's be real the government (Medicaid) is paying 100% of the costs for most pregnant women with no responsible father. So I'm not sure how that's supposed to work with this. But yeah they should split it.
No, legally men bear 100% of the responsibility.
A woman can get an abortion, put the kid up for adoption and in a lot of places they can even legally abandon the child.
Read the article. Louisiana has banned abortion.
Bitches go in barrels. Got it.
Aren't Republicans supposed to be the pro-male party? Fucking RINOs not following Trump.
Republicans are the pro-tradcuckery party. They just know how to use the brakes on a train wreck.
They just suck less than the Dems in that respect. Almost no one in the party gives a shit. Besides Trump talking about false accusations during Kavanaugh's attempted lynching Josh Hawley is the only one who consistently talks about men's issues, and he's a mixed bag on that to say the least.
Trump didn't even abort Ivanka when he discovered that it was a girl. He is a TRAITOR.