Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Women's groups pushed to hold children's parents accountable for child support for female pedo rapists, so...
Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
Women's groups pushed to hold children's parents accountable for child support for female pedo rapists, so...
There was also a court case that set the precedent that the male minor was liable for backdated child support when they became an adult, in 1993.
Why didn't you answer the question? You think that women who are raped should have to pay the pregnancy costs? A rape tax or fine?