How is it any worse than a whore deciding to forgo an abortion she has the right to because she wants to extort money from the guy who may or may be the father? At least under this scenario the whore is required to take a tiny amount of responsibility.
This is pretty rare. Only really happens among the trashiest of women or strippers trying to extort politicians. At least with abortion, the men do have a way out. Almost every single man I know had got a chick pregnant and she has had an abortion. It's way more common than people realize.
Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?
This is why men should support abortion because tradcucks will find a way to make no abortion worse for men.
How is it any worse than a whore deciding to forgo an abortion she has the right to because she wants to extort money from the guy who may or may be the father? At least under this scenario the whore is required to take a tiny amount of responsibility.
This is pretty rare. Only really happens among the trashiest of women or strippers trying to extort politicians. At least with abortion, the men do have a way out. Almost every single man I know had got a chick pregnant and she has had an abortion. It's way more common than people realize.
It just feels like women punishing us for not supporting what they wanted.
It is but the tradcucks think they're doing the right thing.
Question: why are you mad about this when the proposal isn't even unreasonable, when you don't live in Louisiana, and when you are voluntarily celibate or so you say?
It is unreasonable, for the same reason child support and alimony are.
Women are responsible for their own actions, are capable of standing up on their own feet (especially in our heavily biased society) and have more forms of birth control available to them, which means they should be responsible for pregnancy.
All three make perfect sense, depending on how they are applied. If one parent is a derelict, and refuses to care for his kid, then it makes sense that he should at least send money.
And they're also responsible for men's actions, apparently. Not sure if you have been taught about the birds and the bees, but it's not something a woman does on her own.
What's more, you oppose abortion even in cases of rape (because you say it will lead to false accusations in order to be able to get an abortion). Which means that the woman will have to pay these pregnancy costs for the privilege of having been raped. A rape victim fine, if you will. Charming, isn't it?