We all know that if by some act of Satan they're able to pull this off the first troon to get pregnant like this will abort it to make a statement and he'll be celebrated as stunning and brave for doing so.
2 decades is enough to try to put the trans cat back in the back, for good.
You're more optimistic than I am. Putting the trans cat back in the bag will require extreme measures that I don't think the West has the balls to implement. If it did we wouldn't have the problem in the first place.
I can't imagine how you would even begin to transplant a uterus from a woman into a man. First of all, what about the fallopian tubes and ovaries? Or will the uterus just be there on its own? Then you have the issue of blood supply. Would you have to make a a network of blood vessels for it from scratch? There's a limit to the number of veins that you can harvest from legs to make new arteries. What about the ligaments and muscles needed to hold it up and prevent if from prolapsing? Biological middle-aged and elderly women sometimes have hysterectomies because their pelvic floors can't support their uteruses. I can't imagine how that would work without even having the right structure for them.
Really demented transgender folx have thought this was possible for years now but it is literally not medically possible and never will be possible to do this and any Dr. Moreau motherfucker who even suggests it should spend the rest of their life in prison.
any Dr. Moreau motherfucker who even suggests it should spend the rest of their life in prison.
That should be "HIS life" referring to "motherfucker."
I agree 100% with your sentiment, but using a plural pronoun for a singular antecedent is part of the left's language hijack.
This is not nit-picking. It's my job to raise awareness of the left's language games. Always use masculine pronouns generically for singular antecedents referring to people. It rankles feminists and their PC faggot cuckolds.
I remember when academic feminists changed the usage around 30 years ago, and I am familiar with the sophistry that defends the practice.
Awkward, clumsy. The male pronouns should be used generically again. As for those who use exclusively feminine pronouns or alternate between masculine and feminine (which I advised my students to do when I was teaching to make things easier on them)--this is admitting defeat. Why capitulate to feminist fascists and make the feminine pronouns generic?
The fact that the editors of a few grammar handbooks and style guides should have had such a massive NEGATIVE impact on clear writing has always baffled and irritated me. Probably another instance of higher ed bullshit infiltrating into the wider culture, like neo-Marxism, anti-whiteness, and every other damned strain of mind poison currently killing us. "Ivory tower" my Aunt Fanny.
Murdoch was reported in 2011 as advocating more open immigration policies in western nations generally.
In the United States, Murdoch and chief executives from several major corporations, including Hewlett-Packard, Boeing and Disney joined New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg to form the Partnership for a New American Economy to advocate "for immigration reform – including a path to legal status for all illegal aliens now in the United States".
The coalition, reflecting Murdoch and Bloomberg's own views, also advocates significant increases in legal immigration to the United States as a means of boosting America's sluggish economy and lowering unemployment. The Partnership's immigration policy prescriptions are notably similar to those of the Cato Institute and the US Chamber of Commerce — both of which Murdoch has supported in the past.
On 5 September 2010, Murdoch testified before the House Subcommittee on Immigration, Citizenship, Refugees, Border Security, and International Law Membership on the "Role of Immigration in Strengthening America's Economy". In his testimony, Murdoch called for ending mass deportations and endorsed a "comprehensive immigration reform" plan that would include a pathway to citizenship for all illegal immigrants.
Just google Rupert Murdoch for more.
Sure, he supported Trump, but he also supported Killary and Obummer. RINO/Flip flopper. I can't make heads or tails of it, but...I don't know, you be the judge.
We all know that if by some act of Satan they're able to pull this off the first troon to get pregnant like this will abort it to make a statement and he'll be celebrated as stunning and brave for doing so.
You're more optimistic than I am. Putting the trans cat back in the bag will require extreme measures that I don't think the West has the balls to implement. If it did we wouldn't have the problem in the first place.
'It's just in college! The real world will soon straighten them out!'
Until we CHANGE the law to prevent such hateful transphobic lawsuits! We'll also shame and disbar any attorney who would take those cases.
But I hope you're right.
I can't imagine how you would even begin to transplant a uterus from a woman into a man. First of all, what about the fallopian tubes and ovaries? Or will the uterus just be there on its own? Then you have the issue of blood supply. Would you have to make a a network of blood vessels for it from scratch? There's a limit to the number of veins that you can harvest from legs to make new arteries. What about the ligaments and muscles needed to hold it up and prevent if from prolapsing? Biological middle-aged and elderly women sometimes have hysterectomies because their pelvic floors can't support their uteruses. I can't imagine how that would work without even having the right structure for them.
This whole thing is a logistical nightmare.
Also just a regular nightmare
What will we do, put it in a box?
Aw sweet, man-made horrors beyond my comprehension!
Really demented transgender folx have thought this was possible for years now but it is literally not medically possible and never will be possible to do this and any Dr. Moreau motherfucker who even suggests it should spend the rest of their life in prison.
That should be "HIS life" referring to "motherfucker."
I agree 100% with your sentiment, but using a plural pronoun for a singular antecedent is part of the left's language hijack.
This is not nit-picking. It's my job to raise awareness of the left's language games. Always use masculine pronouns generically for singular antecedents referring to people. It rankles feminists and their PC faggot cuckolds.
I remember when academic feminists changed the usage around 30 years ago, and I am familiar with the sophistry that defends the practice.
What about "his or her"?
Awkward, clumsy. The male pronouns should be used generically again. As for those who use exclusively feminine pronouns or alternate between masculine and feminine (which I advised my students to do when I was teaching to make things easier on them)--this is admitting defeat. Why capitulate to feminist fascists and make the feminine pronouns generic?
The fact that the editors of a few grammar handbooks and style guides should have had such a massive NEGATIVE impact on clear writing has always baffled and irritated me. Probably another instance of higher ed bullshit infiltrating into the wider culture, like neo-Marxism, anti-whiteness, and every other damned strain of mind poison currently killing us. "Ivory tower" my Aunt Fanny.
Being a mad scientist is fun! - Predators.
Paging Dr. Mengele!
P.S.
Why in the FUCK is Fox news of all entities playing the pronoun game? MEN want uteruses (uteri?) implanted in them to satisfy their insane delusions.
NEVER use "trans men/women" EVER! It reinforces the popular delusion that changing sex is possible.
Murdoch family.
Just google Rupert Murdoch for more.
Sure, he supported Trump, but he also supported Killary and Obummer. RINO/Flip flopper. I can't make heads or tails of it, but...I don't know, you be the judge.