Why do the banks own America and western Europe??
(www.youtube.com)
Comments (34)
sorted by:
There has been plenty of resistance, unfortunately the bankers and the communists won all the recent wars, further enslaving the people.
In theory it's not hard to reclaim our freedom, we just need to do it all at once and through our own initiative instead of relying on a government to do it for us. Because a government and a country can be invaded by the bankers useful idiots.
What we do is to abandon fiat currency. Metals, crypto and other convenient stuff can be used as medium of exchange and store of value. However, all transactions would have to be through bartering.
This will initially be a huge limitation as we can no longer buy stuff from big box stores only accepting digital fiat. Expect to live on raw eggs from your own chickens, potato, carrots and whatever animals you can shoot in the forest.
People have always been peasants in a feudal system. The mechanism just changes. In the Middle Ages, you turned over a portion of your crops to your lord. Today, you pay a portion of your wages towards taxes which pays for interest on limitless debt which causes money to flow up the hierarchy.
Before usurious income tax there was sharecropping and tariffs and literal slavery. Places and times where people were relatively independent are the exception. I say independent because low taxation implies less government to pay for and thus less provided by the government. In this case people had to support themselves. That would be like pioneers, and that's not a system that lasts.
OY! COOL IT WITH THE ANTISEMITISM!
The key is have a wife at home who takes care of the household. That adds a lot of value to men's lives. You can save a thousand a month on food compared to what people spend on eating out, uber eats, etc..., if you have a wife at home cooking. Not to mention, you won't be caught up spending all your money trying to get laid.
Its more about not splitting up family income. The wife is a small part of that equation. If every kid goes out and has to get a new loan for a house that's not winning.
Unfortunately, the bankers already used feminism to destroy that. No way to trust women, when they can stab you in the back with no consequences to themselves. Too many dangers in relationships nowadays and it's all according to design.
Well then focus on pooling family resources instead of investing in a wife. Youre probably going to end up with one anyways but if the wealth is familial, its harder for the wife to just waltz in and claim it.
This is your brain on white nationalism.
See, far-right cucks are such simps. They can't even admit women have malicious intentions of their own.
Exactly. White nationalism is the way to see the truth.
I don't think precisely how you divvy up the chores is the important part.
I could hire Gordon Ramsay to cook for me, while a pornstar dresses up as a waitress to bring it to me, and I'd still save money over a divorce.
You save in the short term if you're lucky, and lose heavily in the medium to long term. Your losses are effectively limitless, as courts can order a cut of your future wages to go to your ex easily, on top of the settlement.
This is fair but I'm sure things are different for Pakistani guys. If the wife divorces you, you just honor kill her.
because a klansman sold us all down the river
Tell us you have a shitty credit score without telling us you have a shitty credit score.
Society wouldn't function without banks. It would become a giant popularity contest where only people with large amounts of social capital would have a chance to build businesses.
The banks overwhelmingly support feminist garbage. It's funny how you pivot into defending them. You really are the Eternal Liberal in your own special way.
Before this comment chain, it was funny to call Imp j*wish. Now, it's simply a fact.
All banks are Citigroup?
I'm defending them because society literally cannot run without them.
As I said, without banks, everything would be a popularity contest. You'd have to personally know people with money to help you. It would be a society that would be even more geared towards the elite's interests.
"Help you" ? That's not how banks work. The whole economy is built around debt. That's not a charitable arrangement. It's an exploitative one. In real estate, for example, the costs are prohibitive for a vast majority of people to buy a home without going into debt. The whole market is shaped so banks get their cut.
Nobody said it's a charitable arrangement, but things won't magically become cheaper. They help you make up the difference between what you have and what you need, and in return, they get a profit based on the calculated risk of default.
The fantasy land of people lending out money without interest is based on nothing. No sane person will lend money to random people with no benefit to themselves, while they shoulder all the risk. This is why banks exist, they take the risk, and the number of transactions mitigates risk of defaults in normal circumstances, because the profits can write off around 2-3% of bad lending.
2008 happened because of encouragement to banks to take on low-grade borrowers who were highly likely to default, and automated risk systems that calculated them as safe.
Real estate prices increased because the wealthy bought in to diversify their holdings. Nearly all fund managers recommended hard assets at the beginning of 2022. It pushed the demand even higher, while supply was lowering due to material costs.
What you need is prohibitively expensive thanks to this system. You ignored that point in my comment.
Real estate wasn't cheap before 2022, and even your excuse is a flaw in the system. Huge swathes of the population must be priced out of the real estate market to accommodate the other, riskier debts.
I'm just going to repeat this. You don't seem to get it. If you got rid of banks, something operating on the same principles would appear.
The entire idea is broken, there's no need to argue it.
You'd love communism. Each person gets one room and absolutely nothing more than they need.
What's the alternative? You don't have banks, so now only the rich can afford homes and...oh, now you're back to feudalism.
I never said I wanted to get rid of banks entirely. I don't want a debt/usury based economy.
There is no reason to think it's inevitability that you pay interest to parasites to buy anything worth buying.
Buying homes for their real value instead of their plus a bunch of parasitic interest.
We are on the road to an even worse neo-feudalism now. The investor class whose dicks you can't get out of your mouth are the ones pushing the "you will own nothing and be happy" bullshit. But I get it. You have stonk investments. You tied your future to theirs so you must defend "line go up" ideology at all costs, even though those people are the ones pushing feminism as well.
Global banker ESG will cram feminine penises down your throat until you choke to death, Imp.
Blackrock actually petitioned that women shouldn't qualify as a minority, that such measures should be reserved for actual minority groups not people with clever legal teams. Honestly speaking, they've done more to take on women than any of the alt-right cuckolds or tradcucks.
I have a list of the major ESG banks, nobody listens to me though. It's not about AUM for the entire company, it's about AUM for their ESG branch and how actively their investments are managed.
You are a fucking clown.
https://www.blackrock.com/corporate/about-us/diversity-equity-and-inclusion
Yeah, BlackRock is really fighting the good fight. Larry Fink is a Jewish man so of course you are going to hamster your way into defending this shit. Pathetic.
Come on man, don't stereotype yourself like this. I know this ingroup bias is strong but don't make your brain into pretzel to defend ESG when they are the reason why the current media and big corporation shove the feminism and strong wahmen into every shows and every top positions and still manage to survive the bankruptcy.
I have a perfect credit score, and I despise banks (reserve banking -- not necessarily as just places that store your value and valuables), usury, and the people that facilitate those.