During her 2015 trial, she said she killed her son out of "a mother's love," in the fear that her first husband might kill her. She also said that she was saving the boy from being turned over to his biological father, her second husband, whom she suspected of child abuse.
"I wanted him to be safe and at peace at any cost," Jordan told told CBS New York in 2014, adding that she attempted to take her own life after taking her son's.
There’s female “empathy” for you, shallow narcissism with a twang of sociopathy.
After she was sentenced in 2015 to serve 18 years, Jordan began her appeal. She served nearly five years before being released from jail in 2020 after her conviction was overturned on procedural technicalities. Her attorneys had argued that one of the judge's rulings had violated Jordan's Sixth Amendment right to a "speedy and public trial."
Jordan faced a new trial. She was free on bail. But after a hearing on Thursday — a day before her death — her bail was revoked by Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor. She was scheduled to return to custody while awaiting her new trial.
I’m amazed Sotomayor wasn’t applauding her strength and fortitude in killing her son.
Hmm, I think the Texas case where she forced the child to undergo gender reassignment so she could get an extra $5k a month is the most feminist thing.
Sometimes you need to throw some 'red meat' to keep the wolves at bay. They usually have bitches like this used as an example where they have no influence or connections as a scapegoat to prove they believe in justice.
...released from jail in 2020 after her conviction was overturned on procedural technicalities. Her attorneys had argued that one of the judge's rulings had violated Jordan's Sixth Amendment right to a "speedy and public trial."
January 6th political prisoners would like a word.
Also, it should go without saying, but that woman was a psycho.
The only bizarre thing about it is that the father was going to get custody. A woman fighting to the death to avoid that outcome is par for the course. There's nothing more feminist than what she did.
In other words, she killed herself because she was going back into custody.
She should never have been let out. Usually when someone gets a new trial after conviction, they sit it out in county jail instead of being on the street because the presumption is that they're likely to be convicted again. Plus there is a heightened risk that the person will harm themselves or others or attempt to flee custody or commit other offenses.
I think that its telling that she should not have been let out is that her bail was revoked and even Sotomayer couldn't think of a reason to keep her on the street.
There’s female “empathy” for you, shallow narcissism with a twang of sociopathy.
I’m amazed Sotomayor wasn’t applauding her strength and fortitude in killing her son.
So she killed the kid to keep the father from getting custody. There's nothing more feminist than that.
Hmm, I think the Texas case where she forced the child to undergo gender reassignment so she could get an extra $5k a month is the most feminist thing.
"Look at what you make me do!" is a classic, narcissistic line.
Sometimes you need to throw some 'red meat' to keep the wolves at bay. They usually have bitches like this used as an example where they have no influence or connections as a scapegoat to prove they believe in justice.
She is crazy. I am glad she is dead.
January 6th political prisoners would like a word.
Also, it should go without saying, but that woman was a psycho.
Say hi to Valerie Solanas in hell! You'll be making a lot of friends!
Her physiognomy looked pretty demonic so I'm sure she'll fit right in.
Imp, you can be honest. Was this your work? Have you been expanding your horizons into extra-curricular activities?
What a bizarre story.
The only bizarre thing about it is that the father was going to get custody. A woman fighting to the death to avoid that outcome is par for the course. There's nothing more feminist than what she did.
In other words, she killed herself because she was going back into custody.
She should never have been let out. Usually when someone gets a new trial after conviction, they sit it out in county jail instead of being on the street because the presumption is that they're likely to be convicted again. Plus there is a heightened risk that the person will harm themselves or others or attempt to flee custody or commit other offenses.
I think that its telling that she should not have been let out is that her bail was revoked and even Sotomayer couldn't think of a reason to keep her on the street.
Nothing of value was lost.
My thoughts too!
How can I learn this power?
Fatal lack of eye contact.