As per usual, never change African mythology. But mythology of white cultures? That's free game. These freaks are always the same.
I've stopped hating modern TV though. I've simply moved on. There's so much old media out there, both films and series I haven't watched and those that are worthy of re-watching. Occasionally a new show might break through with enough praise from the sources I trust, but otherwise I just ignore it. The opposite of love isn't hate, it's apathy. And I am apathetic to pretty much anything from modern media bar a small handful of exceptions.
Not just African, Mulan is curiously the only Disney remake where no one (zero, null, including unnamed background characters) was randomly race swapped in an "update for modern audiences" to "better reflect the world that we live in".
they know the chinese would go ape shit if they race swapped people in Mulan.. lol it would end up like Little Trouble Big China, except that was a good movie XD...
Can confirm having grown up in sub Saharan Africa. They have no written tradition, everything is passed down orally through word of mouth. Which is why different tribes have wildly different interpretations of the same legends, like a game of broken telephone spanning hundreds of years.
They also never invented the wheel.
They also stack bricks beneath their beds because they believe in a demon midget called the Tokolosh who hides under there and waits until you’re asleep.
Learning one of their languages was something else as well. Once you figure out the clicks and lisp sounds, they’re actually basic and primitive to a fault. There aren’t actually enough words in Zulu for example to describe all the things out in the world. Some words therefore have like five different meanings.
Imagine someone telling you, “I think your wife is purple/goose/sandwich/sunbeam/suspension bridge...”
Yip, and then I get to hear dow-eyed foreign TV doctors celebrate how this or that tribe from this or that African country, “don’t even have a word for heart disease! 😱”
Motherfucker it’s not because they’re all healthy. They don’t have a word for gravity either 😐😑🤦🏼
This is a great read, and I can tell this author really did spend a lot of time living in my country. Most of what he says is spot on, especially where he talks about their having no concept of keeping a promise, their lack of forethought and their bloodlust.
These are all things I grew up kind of intrinsically knowing about them, as the author says, if you’re a white person capable of abstract thought you can predict what’s going to happen or what a group of Africans is going to do and prempt them in order to get yourself out of harms way, in fact YOU HAVE TO in order to stay alive. It’s funny to me where the author acknowledges his assumptions can be misconstrued as “racist”, because that’s 99% of the reason why white South Africans got such vicious backlash from the rest of the world in the 80’s, why we’re still portrayed as evil racist thugs today in mission impossible movies etc.
We were this weird little militarised country at the bottom of the world that spoke a funny, Germanish-sounding language and wouldn’t let blacks live in our cities. But it was never because we hated them, it was because we recognised the cultural differences were simply too vast and incompatible for both races to flourish. It’s hard to build a country when your farms are being burned, your livestock stolen, your women and children raped etc by a group of simpletons still stuck in the Stone Age with no concept of morality. We recognised they needed to be managed, they needed to be educated, they needed to be taught the concepts we all took for granted. Those were the real reasons for the apartheid policies that formed in the years that followed.
Contrary to everything that’s been written about it in the decades since, the apartheid policy wasn’t born out of hatred for blacks (if it was, we would have simply slaughtered them as Europeans slaughtered indigenous tribes elsewhere in the world). No, we wanted to uplift them into something better, we wanted to civilise them, guide them to the Lord as our deeply Calvinist Christian culture demanded.
So we built them parallel cities, highways, roads, hospitals and schools (things the tribes just a generation previously could never have even conceptualised sitting around the fire in their animal skins), and we told them, “all of this can be yours. All we ask is that you keep to your side and we’ll keep to ours, okay? Anything at all you need, just give a holler, we’re happy to help. Just as long as you keep to your side so that our women and children are safe”. That’s ALL that apartheid ever was. The term literally meant “seperate DEVELOPMENT”.
Development, not genocide, not racism, not any of the bullshit CNN and the other fake news peddled in the 80’s. Development.
But they didn’t develop. They torched the cities and schools and hospitals we built them, their areas became lawless hell holes almost immediately for all the reasons the author in your link highlights. And once their areas were absolute third world shit holes, you’d better believe CNN were there to film “the abhorrent conditions these poor people are expected to live under”, never mind that all their suffering was self inflicted.
It was also the reason why white South Africans for decades told the UN and the rest of the globalists to fuck off, we didn’t care about their bullshit sanctions. We knew if the apartheid policies ended, our cities and our homes would become as lawless as the African townships. We knew our women and children would be raped and murdered, we knew our infrastructure would rot away and the country we’d built would crumble in just a few decades (oh how wrong we were, right?).
It’s okay though, because they took a well mannered terrorist named Nelson Mandela, a man who’d planted bombs that killed schoolchildren, stuck him in front of the cameras in a nice suit with a few rug rats at his feet and made him president. Such a feel good story! So while everything we predicted would happen was happening, and our country was going to absolute shit on a daily basis, the focus was always on the good feels! It’s almost exactly what’s happening to America in the modern day.
Lol, no. The bricks are literally there to make the bed higher so the demon can’t reach you.
Back in the day, the tribes would make their fires inside a near-sealed rondavel (hut). Science happens, hot air rises, denser & heavier carbon monoxide sinks to the floor. Everyone sleeping on the floor mysteriously dies, everyone perched slightly higher on stacks of shields or Hyde etc are spared. Must have been a midget demon that got those poor dead peeps 🤷🏼♂️
Later when the Europeans arrive and start giving them farm jobs, mining jobs etc, they are introduced to the modern bed, but the superstition persists. The further you are away from the floor, the safer you are from the Tokolosh.
I wanted to say how it's questionable would the international audiences be even interested in anything remotely genuine (unlike the literal Jewish fantasy of Wakanda), but then I remembered there's a French African-folklore animated movie, Kirikou and the Sorceress, that was so successful that it got several sequels and spinoffs in many years after its release and there was even a video game.
To the surprise of many, Kirikou and Sorceress has become one of the greatest successes of French animated cinema. After modest beginnings, thanks to word of mouth the film quickly became a hit in France. Thanks to its success, the film has been translated into 16 languages and was exported around the world. Beginning in 1999, it was distributed in Switzerland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and Norway. In subsequent years, the film also appeared in the United States, Germany and the UK. This international success has been bolstered by dozens of awards, including the Best Feature Film Award at the International Animation Film Festival in Ukraine and the Best European Feature Film Award at the British Animation Film Festival.
That's more than a great most of standalone animated films.
As per usual, never change African mythology. But mythology of white cultures? That's free game.
This is because there is a coordinated effort between the ruling class and the universities themselves to demonize English culture and history and to shove it into the memory hole.
I talked how I had zero expectations, not least because the director is the one behind that Antifa Robin Hood movie and the Halo TV travesty, but I still feel angry. In the book series (from only the 1990s), Sagramor is an extremely rare black person in all Britannia and beyond (Armorica) and everyone is freaked out when first seeing him, so much that the Saxons believe him a demon from their underworld (https://books.google.com/books?id=0CsNyIl7DlgC&pg=PT181). It's very historically grounded despite magic (which may or may not be real, not least because of an unreliable narrator). But lol no, "updated for modern audiences to reflect the world we live in", too, of course. Fuck you.
Let's not forget the Green Knight movie with Pajeet Patel in the lead.
The only silver lining is that these movies tend to bomb financially, which presumably means a lot of normies out there are just as sick of this shit as we are.
Let's not forget the mulatto Guinevere and the black Elian the White (lolz) in the BBC Merlin, just EVERYONE Arthurian being black in Once Upon a Time, blacks everywhere in Guy Ritchie's stupid King Arthur movie (that I also stupidly went to see in a theater without watching any trailer not reading anything beforehand), the black-mulatto Arthur himself (and his half-sister born to another black woman, their father being white) in Netflix's Cursed, and so on, and so forth.
While they never even use any of the actual exotic knights of Arthur, some (at least 2) of whom are canonically half-black while several others are ambiguously Saracen and pagan (probably Arabic and Muslim, maybe Jewish). They just always ignore them because their names aren't the few household ones. Such as,
Sir Palamedes (var. Palomedes, Palomides, Palamede, and Palomydes) is a minor figure within the literary Arthurian tradition. He is a Saracen knight of the Round Table; unbaptised and thus technically a pagan, but a true Christian at heart; a courtly lover who never achieves his desires; a figure of eternal chivalry in his pursuit of the Questing Beast. (...) Perhaps a portion of the fascination the Palamedes of the Prose Tristan has held for critics and writers is due to his narrative positioning as both outsider and insider who is nevertheless effectual. (...) Since he is aware of the near-impossibility of ever winning his beloved and yet continues to adore her despite her rejection of his love, Palamedes is arguably one of the few true courtly lovers in the Arthurian stories. In this sense, his love for her is the pure embodiment of the courtly ideal. (...) The history of the literary Palomedes is long and varied, stretching from the 13th century to the present day. With the resurgence of academic and popular interest in the troubled hero, Palomedes' own popularity has begun to increase. There are many new novels, plays, and poems featuring the character; each presents a different aspect of the tradition, permitting Palomedes to change and adapt to the needs and demands of different audiences in different times.
Not movies and no television lol
Btw Chretien de Troyes might have been a converted Jew who created the Holy Grail motif as a symbol for the need to convert the other Jews to Christianity (https://www.jstor.org/stable/460649).
This series also made IMDb change the user score algorithm, because the early arithmetic mean should be 1.2 and the median 1. So they changed it and thus it became 6.9 (lowered to 5.7 by now).
Fuck. This one stings guys, because I love this trilogy.
None of this makes ANY sense. I'm pretty sure there were no black druids, especially as the Romans tried to wipe them all out. The casting for Merlin is doubly stupid, as it's specifically pointed out how OLD he is during the course of the books.
And Guinevere was always going to be blackwashed, because she's a redhead in the books, and we all know what happens to redheads in media.
I'm surprised that Derfel and Arthur are allowed to be white seeing as they're the main heroes of the series.
It's also worth noticing that all the bad guys are still white. Funny that.
I strongly advise everyone to give this a wide berth, and go and read the original books.
Edit, because I'm still angry: fuck everyone involved in making this.
2nd edit: the actor playing Ligessac is also black. Yay diversity! Cunts.
Along with a presumably very low budget (the fuck even is ITVX) it's guaranted to be a literal shit show. Even worse than the last season of The Last Kingdom.
Instead, They (Merriam-Webster's Word of the Year 2019) invest money in things like ridicalous "prequels" to other fantasy books series.
The Last Kingdom is shit, huh? I’d heard good things from people I don’t entirely trust, but I was wary based on the absence of hit pieces against the show.
Reject this silly blackwashing and stick to reading the original English folklore.
The more the establishment promotes such blasphemy, the more they alienate younger Englishmen from their history and traditions, just as their fucked up ruling class is succeeding in making native white Englishmen a persecuted minority.
Support all organizations seeking to revive respect for English history and tradition, like the Lotus Eaters.
Just discovered this organization and would like any feedback from UK citizens about its presence and potential for influence: https://www.libertydefenders.org/
Looks somewhat slapdash/amateurish, but it's ideologically sound.
It's waaaay more Welsh than English here. The narrator is an "Englishman" (Saxon) but raised by the Britons (after miraclously surviving their ritual sacrifice as an infant) and entirely identifying with them:
These are the tales of the last days before the great darkness descended. These are the tales of the land we call Lloegyr, which means the Lost Lands, the country that was once ours but which our enemies now call England.
The author usually writes about the English, including in The Saxon Chronicles / The Last Kingdom (the Viking invasion of England).
Technically of course it's wrong, but in general... Everyone does that here in Europe. England is way shorter to say than United Kingdom (and no one abbreviates it in speech). Only when you really want to work out some difference in the UK you can start mentioning Scotland/Wales/NI and when you then mention England it's clear that you only mean England.
Or around topics like football.
Same way when you say Ireland you only mean the Republic unless it's clear you mean something else.
"For modern audiences" means "will be dated as fuck"
The books were fucking modern already, from the mid/late 1990s, and got their audiences because without it there would be no "adaptation". But no.
Don't you know Britain has always looked like modern London? Including all the stabbings that
don'thappen."All the stabbings" would fit the story well lol
As per usual, never change African mythology. But mythology of white cultures? That's free game. These freaks are always the same.
I've stopped hating modern TV though. I've simply moved on. There's so much old media out there, both films and series I haven't watched and those that are worthy of re-watching. Occasionally a new show might break through with enough praise from the sources I trust, but otherwise I just ignore it. The opposite of love isn't hate, it's apathy. And I am apathetic to pretty much anything from modern media bar a small handful of exceptions.
Not just African, Mulan is curiously the only Disney remake where no one (zero, null, including unnamed background characters) was randomly race swapped in an "update for modern audiences" to "better reflect the world that we live in".
Meanwhile even Snow White isn't white lol
they know the chinese would go ape shit if they race swapped people in Mulan.. lol it would end up like Little Trouble Big China, except that was a good movie XD...
Africans would have to have recorded their mythology in some fashion for other people to be able to update it.
Can confirm having grown up in sub Saharan Africa. They have no written tradition, everything is passed down orally through word of mouth. Which is why different tribes have wildly different interpretations of the same legends, like a game of broken telephone spanning hundreds of years.
They also never invented the wheel.
They also stack bricks beneath their beds because they believe in a demon midget called the Tokolosh who hides under there and waits until you’re asleep.
Learning one of their languages was something else as well. Once you figure out the clicks and lisp sounds, they’re actually basic and primitive to a fault. There aren’t actually enough words in Zulu for example to describe all the things out in the world. Some words therefore have like five different meanings.
Imagine someone telling you, “I think your wife is purple/goose/sandwich/sunbeam/suspension bridge...”
It’s no wonder they’re perpetually confused.
This explains why the zulu to english dictionary is only around 100 pages long
Yip, and then I get to hear dow-eyed foreign TV doctors celebrate how this or that tribe from this or that African country, “don’t even have a word for heart disease! 😱”
Motherfucker it’s not because they’re all healthy. They don’t have a word for gravity either 😐😑🤦🏼
https://www.amren.com/news/2017/10/morality-racial-differences/
they don't understand abstract concepts
This is a great read, and I can tell this author really did spend a lot of time living in my country. Most of what he says is spot on, especially where he talks about their having no concept of keeping a promise, their lack of forethought and their bloodlust.
These are all things I grew up kind of intrinsically knowing about them, as the author says, if you’re a white person capable of abstract thought you can predict what’s going to happen or what a group of Africans is going to do and prempt them in order to get yourself out of harms way, in fact YOU HAVE TO in order to stay alive. It’s funny to me where the author acknowledges his assumptions can be misconstrued as “racist”, because that’s 99% of the reason why white South Africans got such vicious backlash from the rest of the world in the 80’s, why we’re still portrayed as evil racist thugs today in mission impossible movies etc.
We were this weird little militarised country at the bottom of the world that spoke a funny, Germanish-sounding language and wouldn’t let blacks live in our cities. But it was never because we hated them, it was because we recognised the cultural differences were simply too vast and incompatible for both races to flourish. It’s hard to build a country when your farms are being burned, your livestock stolen, your women and children raped etc by a group of simpletons still stuck in the Stone Age with no concept of morality. We recognised they needed to be managed, they needed to be educated, they needed to be taught the concepts we all took for granted. Those were the real reasons for the apartheid policies that formed in the years that followed.
Contrary to everything that’s been written about it in the decades since, the apartheid policy wasn’t born out of hatred for blacks (if it was, we would have simply slaughtered them as Europeans slaughtered indigenous tribes elsewhere in the world). No, we wanted to uplift them into something better, we wanted to civilise them, guide them to the Lord as our deeply Calvinist Christian culture demanded.
So we built them parallel cities, highways, roads, hospitals and schools (things the tribes just a generation previously could never have even conceptualised sitting around the fire in their animal skins), and we told them, “all of this can be yours. All we ask is that you keep to your side and we’ll keep to ours, okay? Anything at all you need, just give a holler, we’re happy to help. Just as long as you keep to your side so that our women and children are safe”. That’s ALL that apartheid ever was. The term literally meant “seperate DEVELOPMENT”.
Development, not genocide, not racism, not any of the bullshit CNN and the other fake news peddled in the 80’s. Development.
But they didn’t develop. They torched the cities and schools and hospitals we built them, their areas became lawless hell holes almost immediately for all the reasons the author in your link highlights. And once their areas were absolute third world shit holes, you’d better believe CNN were there to film “the abhorrent conditions these poor people are expected to live under”, never mind that all their suffering was self inflicted.
It was also the reason why white South Africans for decades told the UN and the rest of the globalists to fuck off, we didn’t care about their bullshit sanctions. We knew if the apartheid policies ended, our cities and our homes would become as lawless as the African townships. We knew our women and children would be raped and murdered, we knew our infrastructure would rot away and the country we’d built would crumble in just a few decades (oh how wrong we were, right?).
It’s okay though, because they took a well mannered terrorist named Nelson Mandela, a man who’d planted bombs that killed schoolchildren, stuck him in front of the cameras in a nice suit with a few rug rats at his feet and made him president. Such a feel good story! So while everything we predicted would happen was happening, and our country was going to absolute shit on a daily basis, the focus was always on the good feels! It’s almost exactly what’s happening to America in the modern day.
Is the midget demon repelled by bricks like the vampires are by garlic?
Lol, no. The bricks are literally there to make the bed higher so the demon can’t reach you.
Back in the day, the tribes would make their fires inside a near-sealed rondavel (hut). Science happens, hot air rises, denser & heavier carbon monoxide sinks to the floor. Everyone sleeping on the floor mysteriously dies, everyone perched slightly higher on stacks of shields or Hyde etc are spared. Must have been a midget demon that got those poor dead peeps 🤷🏼♂️
Later when the Europeans arrive and start giving them farm jobs, mining jobs etc, they are introduced to the modern bed, but the superstition persists. The further you are away from the floor, the safer you are from the Tokolosh.
Maybe it realises how dumb those intended victims are by doing that and it doesn't want to catch the stupid.
I wanted to say how it's questionable would the international audiences be even interested in anything remotely genuine (unlike the literal Jewish fantasy of Wakanda), but then I remembered there's a French African-folklore animated movie, Kirikou and the Sorceress, that was so successful that it got several sequels and spinoffs in many years after its release and there was even a video game.
That's more than a great most of standalone animated films.
This is because there is a coordinated effort between the ruling class and the universities themselves to demonize English culture and history and to shove it into the memory hole.
I talked how I had zero expectations, not least because the director is the one behind that Antifa Robin Hood movie and the Halo TV travesty, but I still feel angry. In the book series (from only the 1990s), Sagramor is an extremely rare black person in all Britannia and beyond (Armorica) and everyone is freaked out when first seeing him, so much that the Saxons believe him a demon from their underworld (https://books.google.com/books?id=0CsNyIl7DlgC&pg=PT181). It's very historically grounded despite magic (which may or may not be real, not least because of an unreliable narrator). But lol no, "updated for modern audiences to reflect the world we live in", too, of course. Fuck you.
Let's not forget the Green Knight movie with Pajeet Patel in the lead.
The only silver lining is that these movies tend to bomb financially, which presumably means a lot of normies out there are just as sick of this shit as we are.
Let's not forget the mulatto Guinevere and the black Elian the White (lolz) in the BBC Merlin, just EVERYONE Arthurian being black in Once Upon a Time, blacks everywhere in Guy Ritchie's stupid King Arthur movie (that I also stupidly went to see in a theater without watching any trailer not reading anything beforehand), the black-mulatto Arthur himself (and his half-sister born to another black woman, their father being white) in Netflix's Cursed, and so on, and so forth.
While they never even use any of the actual exotic knights of Arthur, some (at least 2) of whom are canonically half-black while several others are ambiguously Saracen and pagan (probably Arabic and Muslim, maybe Jewish). They just always ignore them because their names aren't the few household ones. Such as,
Not movies and no television lol
Btw Chretien de Troyes might have been a converted Jew who created the Holy Grail motif as a symbol for the need to convert the other Jews to Christianity (https://www.jstor.org/stable/460649).
Did the BBC's show where they cast the Queen of England as the darkest coal black Heart of Darkness style black woman they could find ever come out?
Channel 5 cast a black actress as Ann Boleyn.
Retards.
This series also made IMDb change the user score algorithm, because the early arithmetic mean should be 1.2 and the median 1. So they changed it and thus it became 6.9 (lowered to 5.7 by now).
Click on rating distribution: https://imdb.com/title/tt13406036/ratings/?ref_=tt_ov_rt
You should make a list of shows that feature historical blackwashing.
Quicker to make a list of shows that don’t.
Fuck. This one stings guys, because I love this trilogy.
None of this makes ANY sense. I'm pretty sure there were no black druids, especially as the Romans tried to wipe them all out. The casting for Merlin is doubly stupid, as it's specifically pointed out how OLD he is during the course of the books.
And Guinevere was always going to be blackwashed, because she's a redhead in the books, and we all know what happens to redheads in media.
I'm surprised that Derfel and Arthur are allowed to be white seeing as they're the main heroes of the series.
It's also worth noticing that all the bad guys are still white. Funny that.
I strongly advise everyone to give this a wide berth, and go and read the original books.
Edit, because I'm still angry: fuck everyone involved in making this.
2nd edit: the actor playing Ligessac is also black. Yay diversity! Cunts.
Along with a presumably very low budget (the fuck even is ITVX) it's guaranted to be a literal shit show. Even worse than the last season of The Last Kingdom.
Instead, They (Merriam-Webster's Word of the Year 2019) invest money in things like ridicalous "prequels" to other fantasy books series.
I noped out of the Last Kingdom early, so missed that dumpster fire.
Sigh. I'm just going to pretend this doesn't exist. I still have the novels.
The Last Kingdom is shit, huh? I’d heard good things from people I don’t entirely trust, but I was wary based on the absence of hit pieces against the show.
It's mostly fine.
The main cast if you wonder about that: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bd/24/1c/bd241ca2851ebc5d4528d7b87fc0c9cf.jpg
Another flop, another "message" sent.
Reject this silly blackwashing and stick to reading the original English folklore.
The more the establishment promotes such blasphemy, the more they alienate younger Englishmen from their history and traditions, just as their fucked up ruling class is succeeding in making native white Englishmen a persecuted minority.
Support all organizations seeking to revive respect for English history and tradition, like the Lotus Eaters.
Just discovered this organization and would like any feedback from UK citizens about its presence and potential for influence: https://www.libertydefenders.org/
Looks somewhat slapdash/amateurish, but it's ideologically sound.
It's waaaay more Welsh than English here. The narrator is an "Englishman" (Saxon) but raised by the Britons (after miraclously surviving their ritual sacrifice as an infant) and entirely identifying with them:
The author usually writes about the English, including in The Saxon Chronicles / The Last Kingdom (the Viking invasion of England).
OK, I was historically vague. For political reasons, I consider the entire UK to be "England." Is that wrong?
Don't tell the other countries nationalists lol
I'd rather see a return to conflict among Scotland, England and Ireland than I would like to see the continued dilution of English culture by ay-rabs.
Technically of course it's wrong, but in general... Everyone does that here in Europe. England is way shorter to say than United Kingdom (and no one abbreviates it in speech). Only when you really want to work out some difference in the UK you can start mentioning Scotland/Wales/NI and when you then mention England it's clear that you only mean England.
Or around topics like football.
Same way when you say Ireland you only mean the Republic unless it's clear you mean something else.
When Fate/Grand Order has a portrayal of Merlin that is miles more respectful...