Frankly, I think this is a good race to study in order to understand the margins of victory actually needed to counter voter-fraud. Whatever investment they made in desperately trying to remove her from power, they have failed in that investment. I had actually heard that she had lost her seat several days ago, but that appears to have been yet another lie of propaganda to demoralize and promote concessions from our side of the fight.
The nation-wide republican performance saw the Republicans actually having a nationwide popular vote win, and securing massive gains across the US even in places that were already staunchly blue. Where Republicans fared worse are only in places where the voting counts went on for weeks. Where Republicans fared the best is in states that had secure voting systems like Florida and Ohio.
Despite aggressive underfunding of Trump backed candidates by the GOP who are seeking to purge the Republican party of populists, and despite voter fraud efforts by the Democratic Party who seem to be normalizing their behaviors of 2020 in targeted races they know are keys to maintaining power, the Republicans tended to absolutely smash many races that were not areas that were key to federal power.
If Trump backed candidates were a problem to Republicans, those candidates wouldn't have been absolutely demolishing the primaries and have been securing record breaking primary turnouts that were higher than the 2020 election numbers.
Whether you like him or not. Donald Trump is the most popular President among Republicans literally ever. Gallup found his approval rating higher among Republicans than Eisenhower or Reagan. Eisenhower's peak was nearly 92% support, while Reagan's was 88%. Trump sailed to 95%. Perchance, you could argue he has a problem with independents, but not Republicans.
And for those independents, we would have seen more blowback on populist candidates and populist issues that we simply didn't see. Instead, some of the biggest issues that Republicans pushed on, particularly crime and opposition to bail reform, did exceedingly well. We've also seen major wins on local elections like school boards.
We are being asked to believe that Trump is somehow poisonous because Republicans don't support the man they have the largest approval rating for in American history, while they also support all of his policies.
Bullshit.
This is followed by the Democratic Party claim that youth voters and abortion carried the day, even though abortion wasn't a focus for Republicans in swing states or blue states, and even though it wasn't a major concern for the general population (just Left-wingers), and the youth vote wasn't particularly different or numerous compared to previous elections.
Well, comrade. The problem is that Lauren Boebert is a far-right, counter-revolutionary, alt-right, neo-nazi, fascist, alt-right, paleo-conservative, ultra-nationalist, far-right, orange man, no good, very bad, rightist. Because of this, she (incredibly) doesn't just do whatever Leftists say.
We must find a strategy to combat these threats to My Democracy without them just giving up! Unfortunately, no one alive has any experience with a time when rightists didn't just cuck themselves and die.
Here's something I don't understand: If the recount is mandated does it still happen now that the subhuman running against her conceded? If it does we're not out of the woods yet as far as this race is concerned.
The thing is, he conceded. You can't really un-concede. Even if, for some reason, it said that she lost by 1 vote, her opponent still conceded and can't take office because they already gave up. You can concede at any time, whether your winning or not isn't relevant.
Yes, but the entire American presidency was on the line. The Democrats wanted a major fight to protect their interests. This means that they are prepared to violate all laws, norms, and customs at tremendous expense, given the reward. Here? Not so much.
Same reason Al Gore only wanted re-counts in 5 counties in Florida and not the whole state. Same reason Hillary Clinton conceded despite have prepared election lawsuits.
Because the lead isn't really that tiny. She's ahead by a couple hundred votes. If he knows that the Democratic machine added 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 votes; and he knows that he's basically out of money, and nothing has changed for the Democrats strategically at a federal or state level; dragging the election argument out risks exposing their operation. The risk just isn't worth the reward. They have the Senate, they won't get the house, so it's just not worth the danger.
Her opponent has conceded, even if the Denver Post has to pretend that the race isn't over yet.
Frankly, I think this is a good race to study in order to understand the margins of victory actually needed to counter voter-fraud. Whatever investment they made in desperately trying to remove her from power, they have failed in that investment. I had actually heard that she had lost her seat several days ago, but that appears to have been yet another lie of propaganda to demoralize and promote concessions from our side of the fight.
The nation-wide republican performance saw the Republicans actually having a nationwide popular vote win, and securing massive gains across the US even in places that were already staunchly blue. Where Republicans fared worse are only in places where the voting counts went on for weeks. Where Republicans fared the best is in states that had secure voting systems like Florida and Ohio.
Despite aggressive underfunding of Trump backed candidates by the GOP who are seeking to purge the Republican party of populists, and despite voter fraud efforts by the Democratic Party who seem to be normalizing their behaviors of 2020 in targeted races they know are keys to maintaining power, the Republicans tended to absolutely smash many races that were not areas that were key to federal power.
If Trump backed candidates were a problem to Republicans, those candidates wouldn't have been absolutely demolishing the primaries and have been securing record breaking primary turnouts that were higher than the 2020 election numbers.
Whether you like him or not. Donald Trump is the most popular President among Republicans literally ever. Gallup found his approval rating higher among Republicans than Eisenhower or Reagan. Eisenhower's peak was nearly 92% support, while Reagan's was 88%. Trump sailed to 95%. Perchance, you could argue he has a problem with independents, but not Republicans.
And for those independents, we would have seen more blowback on populist candidates and populist issues that we simply didn't see. Instead, some of the biggest issues that Republicans pushed on, particularly crime and opposition to bail reform, did exceedingly well. We've also seen major wins on local elections like school boards.
We are being asked to believe that Trump is somehow poisonous because Republicans don't support the man they have the largest approval rating for in American history, while they also support all of his policies.
Bullshit.
This is followed by the Democratic Party claim that youth voters and abortion carried the day, even though abortion wasn't a focus for Republicans in swing states or blue states, and even though it wasn't a major concern for the general population (just Left-wingers), and the youth vote wasn't particularly different or numerous compared to previous elections.
Again, bullshit.
But leftist said she should concede
Well, comrade. The problem is that Lauren Boebert is a far-right, counter-revolutionary, alt-right, neo-nazi, fascist, alt-right, paleo-conservative, ultra-nationalist, far-right, orange man, no good, very bad, rightist. Because of this, she (incredibly) doesn't just do whatever Leftists say.
We must find a strategy to combat these threats to My Democracy without them just giving up! Unfortunately, no one alive has any experience with a time when rightists didn't just cuck themselves and die.
She is basically a double plus ungood person.
I forgot that one.
This was the first time I’ve ever seen a Republican win when votes were counted well after the election
Yeah, that's why I think it might be useful to do a careful examination of it.
Here's something I don't understand: If the recount is mandated does it still happen now that the subhuman running against her conceded? If it does we're not out of the woods yet as far as this race is concerned.
Apparently it does.
The thing is, he conceded. You can't really un-concede. Even if, for some reason, it said that she lost by 1 vote, her opponent still conceded and can't take office because they already gave up. You can concede at any time, whether your winning or not isn't relevant.
I honestly did not know that. So even if the recount shows him to win she still won. Sounds cool but it kind of makes you question why he conceded?
Impy asked the same question:
https://kotakuinaction2.win/p/16ZEDwPsLH/x/c/4TnQaeRt9TH
Sure you can. Al Gore withdrew his concession in 2000 and the country went through electoral hell for 55 days.
Yes, but the entire American presidency was on the line. The Democrats wanted a major fight to protect their interests. This means that they are prepared to violate all laws, norms, and customs at tremendous expense, given the reward. Here? Not so much.
True, but as someone who lived through it, I had to say. It HAS been done.
Not that it mattered. Both Gore and Dubya are swamp trash controlled by elite puppetmasters.
"BUT WAIT! THERE'S MORE!"
Sorry, it just always feels like that with elections anymore, since they can get away with the rigging.
Same reason Al Gore only wanted re-counts in 5 counties in Florida and not the whole state. Same reason Hillary Clinton conceded despite have prepared election lawsuits.
Because the lead isn't really that tiny. She's ahead by a couple hundred votes. If he knows that the Democratic machine added 1,000, 5,000, or 10,000 votes; and he knows that he's basically out of money, and nothing has changed for the Democrats strategically at a federal or state level; dragging the election argument out risks exposing their operation. The risk just isn't worth the reward. They have the Senate, they won't get the house, so it's just not worth the danger.
Probably not.
Frankly, I bet there are a lot of disappointed male feminists that won't get to enjoy rape fantasies because of it.
He brings it up almost all the time, what are you talking about?
That's like saying Steve Bannon doesn't bring up fraud.